http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19091935 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Sun, 10 May 2009 22:53:31 +0800 http://123.55.248.6:8080/www.afwing.com/intro/f4u/legend/xf4u-3b.JPG?MT=1225591801 F2G（測試發動機的型號） http://www.rendersworld.com/Reference/corsair/F2G-1D.jpg http://www.warbirdaeropress.com/articles/Taichi/F2G_57-color_profile-s.jpg http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/1/7/5/1131571.jpg http://modelingmadness.com/reviews/allies/us/usn/garf2ga.jpg 話說回來，P-51也有一種終極改型，用了英國的鉤喙獸發動機，性能也是強到翻，還修改過翼型，不過時不我予，沒有繼續發展下去。（還是敗給噴射機了） http://picasaweb.google.com.tw/efleet0714/moCGHJ#5334035175616759154 http://picasaweb.google.com.tw/efleet0714/moCGHJ#5334035181487060306 這兩張照片是意外翻到的，真有趣。仔細看它的雙反轉槳。 有興趣可以找一本書來看："海盜無敵"。 ^^ http://www.books.com.tw/exep/prod/booksfile.php?item=0010414890 偷吃步一下，有山寨版的可以看： http://www.afwing.com/intro/f4u/legend/15.htm 　　另外再補充幾點：F6F跟F4U的擊落數大概會讓美國陸航軍大感不平，很多時候它們對付的是99艦爆，97艦攻這類低速低性的攻擊機，就算是零式也算好對付。不過P-38遇到的隼，飛燕都比零戰還要結實。P-47跟P-51在歐洲遇到的也都是戰鬥機。所以P-51的實戰表現響噹噹的沒話說。 　　　　 　　而日軍方面，有趣的是陸軍機如四式戰，五式戰都比海軍後期的局地戰鬥機在性能上更為均衡。如紫電是架中低空戰鬥機，大概跟F6F同級。雷電是短程攔截機。產量也不多。在緬印遇到同是高空戰鬥機的P-38，就被ｋ的滿頭包，在日本本土表現較好。可能是多從高空衝下來攻擊正在低空掃射的米國海軍機，戰術運用也會決定成果。 至於四式戰，美軍在戰後的評估認為在後勤條件完備下的表現會比P-51跟P-47好。基本沒啥缺陷，不過也是一架中低空域用的戰鬥機。五式戰的靈活性再好一點。跟P-51交手的結果在美軍數量優勢下仍大致打平，說明它的潛力不錯，極速低（580km/h）是個缺陷，但它對付美軍各種戰鬥機時，根據飛行員的說法似乎都略勝一籌。 話雖如此，Kazuki最愛的還是P-38，目前有一架正在魔改中，等作好了再拿出來瞧瞧。 落落長，不好意思。 XD]]> http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19088447 文章回應 Sun, 10 May 2009 12:23:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19077281 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Fri, 08 May 2009 23:08:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19074103 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Fri, 08 May 2009 14:54:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19073397 文章回應 Fri, 08 May 2009 14:02:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19069577 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Fri, 08 May 2009 00:48:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19067405 文章回應 Thu, 07 May 2009 18:18:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19067357 文章回應 Thu, 07 May 2009 18:08:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19022117 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:16:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19018971 ob.one@yahoo.com.tw(obone) 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:33:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19017805 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:35:53 +0800 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Lancaster http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handley-Page_Halifax 但兩者垂直尾翼形狀 還是其最大的差別]]> http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19017737 zoll@hellokitty.com(ㄎㄎ) 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:13:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19017289 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:38:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19015639 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:27:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19014429 donkeyeer@yahoo.com.tw(阿剛) 文章回應 Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:09:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19014087 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:58:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19014069 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:57:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19014053 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:55:01 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19013439 jordan2@seed.net.tw(亞斯蘭空軍第一狙擊手) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:53:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19003273 zoll@hellokitty.com(ㄎㄎ) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:29:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19003169 donkeyeer@yahoo.com.tw(阿剛) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:58:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19002787 jordan2@seed.net.tw(亞斯蘭空軍第一狙擊手) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:15:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19002505 donkeyeer@yahoo.com.tw(阿剛) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:41:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19002129 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:42:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19002091 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:30:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19001315 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:39:30 +0800 http://www.actionart.ca/index1e.htm]]> http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19001307 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:35:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19001245 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:20:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19001165 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:01:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19001157 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:59:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19001151 1001yeah@gmail.com(閻驊) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:58:56 +0800 http://www.gml2007.com/legends/overstreet.asp http://www.actionart.ca/index1e.htm]]> http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19000877 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:43:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19000589 jordan2@seed.net.tw(亞斯蘭空軍第一狙擊手) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:14:16 +0800 http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA---Navy/Boeing-F-A-18F-Super/1203205/L/&tbl=&photo_nr=4&sok=&sort=&prev_id=1203765&next_id=1202305 2007年以後才出現這種片狀的 http://www.airliners.net/photo/USA---Navy/Boeing-F-A-18F-Super/1195321/L/&tbl=&photo_nr=24&sok=&sort=&prev_id=1195323&next_id=NEXTID]]> http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html http://blog.roodo.com/yenhwa/archives/8813661.html#comment-19000439 bodihsue@hotmail.com(bodihsue) 文章回應 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:50:54 +0800