<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="zh-tw"> 
<title>We the Media - 《草根媒體》</title> 
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/" /> 
<modified>2009-11-30T03:58:09+08:00</modified> 
<tagline></tagline> 
<id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2009://867</id> 
<generator url="http://blog.yam.com/" version="1.0">Roodo Blog</generator> 
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005, </copyright> 
 <entry> 
 <title>The Failure of We (the) Media</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/2765907.html" /> 
 <modified>2007-02-24T17:33:51+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2007-02-24T17:33:51+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2007://867.2765907</id> 
 <created>2007-02-24T17:24:43+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
Skrentablog - The Failure of We (the) Media
There is actually a media revolution in the works. So what's going on here? By implicit definition, participatory media is non-commercial. If it's commercial, someone owns it, and it's not "we" anymore.

Furthermore, as soon as a new media venture crosses the line and tries to become a business, it either becomes a successful business or a failed one. Businesses aren't about ideology, they're about getting a job done and earning revenue to keep the thing going. Even wild success tends to leave ideology behind. Ideology is the realm of nonprofits and failures.

There is still a power law to success, and the few continue to reap disproportionate rewards, as they always have. Pub media turns out to be a farm league for big media. The bloggers who "make it" look more and more like regular media than "us". They graduate to to the A-list, and start to get lumped in and criticised along with the establishment. Success looks like a sellout to a big media company, or a good business doing job boards and conferences on the side to pay the bills. ]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/2765907.html">
<![CDATA[
	Skrentablog - <a href="http://www.skrenta.com/2007/02/the_failure_of_we_the_media.html">The Failure of We (the) Media</a>
<blockquote>There is actually a media revolution in the works. So what's going on here? By implicit definition, participatory media is non-commercial. If it's commercial, someone owns it, and it's not "we" anymore.

Furthermore, as soon as a new media venture crosses the line and tries to become a business, it either becomes a successful business or a failed one. Businesses aren't about ideology, they're about getting a job done and earning revenue to keep the thing going. Even wild success tends to leave ideology behind. Ideology is the realm of nonprofits and failures.

There is still a power law to success, and the few continue to reap disproportionate rewards, as they always have. Pub media turns out to be a farm league for big media. The bloggers who "make it" look more and more like regular media than "us". They graduate to to the A-list, and start to get lumped in and criticised along with the establishment. Success looks like a sellout to a big media company, or a good business doing job boards and conferences on the side to pay the bills. </blockquote>
	]]>
</content>
</entry> 
 <entry> 
 <title>Dan Gillmor&#039;s Visit to Taipei?</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/732412.html" /> 
 <modified>2005-11-15T12:44:11+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2005-11-15T12:44:11+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2005://867.732412</id> 
 <created>2005-11-15T12:31:57+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
來自歐萊禮的訊息：《草根媒體》(We the Media)的作者Dan Gillmor，預定會在11/26-12/3造訪香港，正在考慮是否來台北一趟。各位，有興趣來個座談會/網聚嗎？]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/732412.html">
<![CDATA[
	<div>來自歐萊禮的訊息：</div><div></div><div>《草根媒體》(We the Media)的作者<a href="http://bayosphere.com/blog/dangillmor">Dan Gillmor</a>，預定會在11/26-12/3造訪香港，正在考慮是否來台北一趟。</div><p /><div></div><div>各位，有興趣來個座談會/網聚嗎？</div>
	]]>
</content>
</entry> 
 <entry> 
 <title>&quot;We The Media&quot; 日文版</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/353383.html" /> 
 <modified>2005-08-09T00:22:54+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2005-08-09T00:22:54+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2005://867.353383</id> 
 <created>2005-08-08T23:49:49+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
&quot;We the Media&quot; Japanese Edition：朝日新聞出版，書腰上的大頭是 livedoor 的CEO - 崛江貴文。]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/353383.html">
<![CDATA[
	<img src="http://bayosphere.com/files/bookjapan.jpg" align="left" /><div><a href="http://bayosphere.com/blog/dangillmor/080405/we_the_media">&quot;We the Media&quot; Japanese Edition</a>：</div><div>朝日新聞出版，書腰上的大頭是 <a href="http://www.livedoor.com/">livedoor</a> 的CEO - 崛江貴文。</div>
	]]>
</content>
</entry> 
 <entry> 
 <title>《草根媒體》的台灣經驗</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/208578.html" /> 
 <modified>2005-06-21T23:05:40+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2005-06-21T23:05:40+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2005://867.208578</id> 
 <created>2005-06-21T22:41:49+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
從2005/2本站開幕至今，導覽列上的"台灣經驗"，一直是有標題、無連結、無內容。
但這並不代表，我們沒有台灣經驗。
苦勞網、破報、生命力、南方、應遞媒...，台灣的草根媒體，其實是很讚的。

2005年是blog風起雲湧的一年，那麼，草根媒體的台灣經驗，會有什麼樣的發展呢？
沒有獎品，歡迎參加，留下您的回應或引用:)
]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/208578.html">
<![CDATA[
	從2005/2本站開幕至今，導覽列上的"台灣經驗"，一直是有標題、無連結、無內容。
但這並不代表，我們沒有台灣經驗。
<a href="http://www.coolloud.org.tw/">苦勞網</a>、<a href="http://www.pots.com.tw/">破報</a>、<a href="http://vita.fju.edu.tw/">生命力</a>、<a href="http://www.esouth.org/">南方</a>、<a href="http://twimc.org/">應遞媒</a>...，台灣的草根媒體，其實是很讚的。

2005年是blog風起雲湧的一年，那麼，草根媒體的台灣經驗，會有什麼樣的發展呢？
沒有獎品，歡迎參加，留下您的回應或引用:)

	]]>
</content>
</entry> 
 <entry> 
 <title>《草根媒體》 - 延伸閱讀之網站列表</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/199158.html" /> 
 <modified>2007-02-14T17:53:38+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2007-02-14T17:53:38+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2007://867.199158</id> 
 <created>2005-06-17T23:31:53+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
以下是本書附錄裡的網站列表。連連看作者提供的豐富資訊，收穫會更多哦:) （共169筆） ]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/199158.html">
<![CDATA[
	以下是本書附錄裡的網站列表。連連看作者提供的豐富資訊，收穫會更多哦:) （共169筆） 
	<a href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/199158.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>]]>
</content>
</entry> 
 <entry> 
 <title>《草根媒體》要再刷  - 除錯達人招募中</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/134780.html" /> 
 <modified>2005-05-18T15:02:40+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2005-05-18T15:02:40+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2005://867.134780</id> 
 <created>2005-05-18T14:53:49+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
來自小編的訊息：草根媒體第一刷就要賣完啦!!!
如果你有遇到什麼親朋好友剛好看到書中有錯(像上次的保羅．克魯曼)，或是覺得有什麼翻譯看不懂的地方，就趁現在要重刷的時機提出哦~~時間有限，我只能等到下星期一。:p

本來想拗看看能不能重排版面，不過礙於美編本月工作滿檔(編輯全都有書在排隊)，所以，只好麻煩大家繼續批評指教，下一次重刷的時候，我一定會拗到整本書重排一遍的!!!(小宇宙燃燒)

如果您發現本書有錯字、譯文欠佳，請不吝指教哦（留言或引用本文皆可）！

對於本書封面設計，也歡迎大家批評指教。如果您是設計達人，也歡迎投稿哦（書名與底圖不變）。]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/134780.html">
<![CDATA[
	來自小編的訊息：<blockquote>草根媒體第一刷就要賣完啦!!!
如果你有遇到什麼親朋好友剛好看到書中有錯(像上次的保羅．克魯曼)，或是覺得有什麼翻譯看不懂的地方，就趁現在要重刷的時機提出哦~~時間有限，我只能等到下星期一。:p

本來想拗看看能不能重排版面，不過礙於美編本月工作滿檔(編輯全都有書在排隊)，所以，只好麻煩大家繼續批評指教，下一次重刷的時候，我一定會拗到整本書重排一遍的!!!(小宇宙燃燒)</blockquote>

如果您發現本書有錯字、譯文欠佳，請不吝指教哦（留言或引用本文皆可）！

對於本書封面設計，也歡迎大家批評指教。如果您是設計達人，也歡迎投稿哦（書名與底圖不變）。
	]]>
</content>
</entry> 
 <entry> 
 <title>推薦序：我們在寫網誌，我們在寫歷史</title> 
 <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/73365.html" /> 
 <modified>2005-04-13T16:23:21+08:00</modified> 
 <issued>2005-04-13T16:23:21+08:00</issued> 
 <id>tag:blog.roodo.com,2005://867.73365</id> 
 <created>2005-04-13T15:34:36+08:00</created> 
  <author>
 <name></name> 
 <url>http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/</url> 
 
</author> 
<dc:subject></dc:subject> 
<summary type="text/html" mode="escaped">
<![CDATA[
大約十年前在雜誌上曾看到一幅單格漫畫，漫畫裡畫著一個坐在街角乞討的乞丐，地上擺著空的奶粉罐和一張牌子，牌子上寫著「No E-mail Address（沒有電子郵件住址）」，當時有看到這幅漫畫的人，應該會對漫畫家的幽默會心一笑。的確，在十多年前擁有一個電子郵件住址（更明確的說應該是一個Unix帳號），就等於擁有整新興媒體。經過了十年，這個新興媒體加入了更多元素，身在其中的人都知道它的潛力不容小覷，記者出身的吉摩爾可以算是身在其中感受深刻的一員，他用這本書《We the Media》檢視這新興媒體的走向，主題雖然嚴肅，看完之後讓我同樣會心一笑。]]>
</summary> 
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="zh-tw" xml:base="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/73365.html">
<![CDATA[
	大約十年前在雜誌上曾看到一幅單格漫畫，漫畫裡畫著一個坐在街角乞討的乞丐，地上擺著空的奶粉罐和一張牌子，牌子上寫著「No E-mail Address（沒有電子郵件住址）」，當時有看到這幅漫畫的人，應該會對漫畫家的幽默會心一笑。的確，在十多年前擁有一個電子郵件住址（更明確的說應該是一個Unix帳號），就等於擁有整新興媒體。經過了十年，這個新興媒體加入了更多元素，身在其中的人都知道它的潛力不容小覷，記者出身的吉摩爾可以算是身在其中感受深刻的一員，他用這本書《We the Media》檢視這新興媒體的走向，主題雖然嚴肅，看完之後讓我同樣會心一笑。
	<a href="http://blog.roodo.com/wethemedia/archives/73365.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>]]>
</content>
</entry> 
</feed>