東京kittyアンテナ（＠ｗぷ

-------ヲレの個人用リンク--------------------
個人用リンク1
個人用リンク2
---------------------------------------------

US president Obama announced that his government
would endeavor to renounce nuclear weapons,
requiring the strict implementation of the
sanction resolutions against DPRK and Iran
（＠ｗぷ

参考1

The concept of nuclear deterrent that is
crystalized in the MAD(Mutual Assured Destruction)
is said to lose its validity toward the
belligerent parties in the asymmetric warfare,
such as the terrorists without cities to be
cherished and the governments in discomfiture.

So theoretically speaking Obama seems to follow
the beaten track, however I think he builds
castles in the air. Because everybody knows that
the Pentagon has the largest ordinary weapons
even after the renunciation of nuclear warheads.

Major warlord countries will persist in the
possession of nuclear warheads, considering the
huge amount of ordinary weapons of US forces.

Additionally the concept of nuclear deterrent
is even now efficient for DPRK, because it is
terrified by the retaliation or preemptive
attack of US nuclear warheads on a large scale
（＠ｗぷ

The reason why US has let DPRK exist is purely
geopolitic, namely in order to contain Japan,
securing nuclear deterrent and preventing Japan
from providing its forces with nuclear weapons.

This kind of controllable risk in the Far East
is the kernel of hegemony swayed by the United
States. But Obama's approach is to dissolve
this system, however as the flood is flushed
in thawing glaciers, the new tension in the
international relation will be caused by this
attempt（＠ｗぷ