http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-18017175 selena423@xuite.net(selena) 文章回應 Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:49:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-16586639 ciccy7755@seed.net.tw(kelly) 文章回應 Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:56:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086709 文章回應 Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:23:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086707 文章回應 Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:08:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086705 文章回應 Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:11:59 +0800 公平貿易／倫理（不）消費相關剪報一則的回應張貼，先謝。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086703 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:49:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086701 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:52:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086699 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:56:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086697 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:53:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086695 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 06:09:01 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086693 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:17:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086691 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:01:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086689 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:23:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086687 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:13:30 +0800 這篇去獨立呈現各種文獻，若這樣做有所不妥，請通知我知，我好修正。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086685 文章回應 Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:25:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086683 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:59:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086681 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:48:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086679 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:52:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086677 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:01:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086675 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:58:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086673 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:08:47 +0800 清單，滑鼠捲半天都看不完…… ECO這邊也有些標示的介紹，也是一堆關於公平貿易的認證標誌，我想應該還在持續增加中。 我悲觀地依過去的"台灣蛋撻"經驗，只要一蔚成風潮，想必會有許多NPO/NGO一窩蜂搶進Fair Trade這塊市場，更別說其他的私人企業。 當消費者面對一堆全貼有公平貿易的產品時，Timo所說”另外一個選擇”的誘因是否能繼續存在？ 接下來要面對的或許將是，消費良知的忠誠如何維持？ 如果沒辦法確立品牌形象，做出市場區隔，可能將會只是曇花一現。 以上，淺見。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086671 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:01:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086669 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:54:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086667 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:32:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086665 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:45:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086663 文章回應 Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:43:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086661 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:44:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086659 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:53:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086657 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:22:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086655 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:54:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086653 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:10:02 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086651 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:54:29 +0800 這裡。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086649 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:15:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086647 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:09:56 +0800 OXFAM BG，OXFAM Hong Kong。簡單說，這個單位以援助飢荒為起始，五六十年後的今天已經不只是個單純的〔慈善〕機構，而是在慈善之外加入了對世界貿易的關注和參與改變的運動，公平貿易農產現在他們是主推單位。他們其他還有做HIV/AIDS的事工。 嗯，果不其然，樂施會在台灣，其知名度或嗯〔公信力〕應該是比星巴克還不如。 關於主婦聯盟，我的觀察和妳也類似，她們的主要訴求，好像是吃得健康有機無農藥污染，但我覺得這個是面對消費者時說的話。她們既然卡在中間，回過頭就要面對生產者，在面對生產者時，我覺得，她們應該也是得offer出一個better deal，才能有今天的局面，只是這個better deal是不是有被拿來宣傳，有沒有被整理跟說出來這樣。 出發點是沒關係的，OXFAM從飢荒救援出發，做到公平貿易去，一個從吃的健康出發的組織，當然也可以加入公平貿易的思維。這個方向我覺得確實可以嚐試。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086645 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:09:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086643 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:08:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086641 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:38:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086639 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:38:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086637 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:26:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086635 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/498604.html#comment-8086633 文章回應 Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:42:42 +0800