http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-19825757 文章回應 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:10:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-17100371 文章回應 Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:14:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-16118939 文章回應 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:07:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-16116989 rocker_is_dead@yahoo.com.tw(許凱婷) 文章回應 Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:51:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-16082557 文章回應 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:54:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-16081873 文章回應 Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:35:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089995 文章回應 Sun, 24 Sep 2006 01:41:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089993 文章回應 Thu, 21 Sep 2006 03:57:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089991 文章回應 Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:06:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089989 文章回應 Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:02:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089987 knarf@edirect168.com(JF) 文章回應 Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:53:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089985 文章回應 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:19:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089983 文章回應 Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:16:08 +0800 >五十年都在等了，又不是沒等過。 而每次讀，每次讀到這句，都會眼睛濕起來，都會在心裡自己問， 那，還要等多久呢？而且，其實，何止五十年呢？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089981 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:56:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089979 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:12:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089977 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:00:13 +0800 為何少了，也許，他想成〔中間路線走得不夠〕也未必。在這種時候，出現一個政見比工黨還左的自由民主黨，而且票增加了，這一方面是明確說明對某一方向的支持，同時，也明確地跟工黨表達了〔我嫌你不夠左啊〕的意思。 回到你的回應，接續你的比喻，如果寶貝，是我們的公民自覺，是我們的肚子，家庭，教育，醫療，那麼，我們確實該把那些寶貝搶回來，讓他們爽夠了，也該換人民爽爽看了吧？有權者會害怕失去，這對我們來說倒是無妨，既然我們什麼都沒了，我們還害怕失去什麼嗎？ 另外，是的，本土論述自然有他的物質基礎，憑空動員是動員不來的，但如果動員的標的，並非釐清這過去的種種，並刻畫出台灣多語族的共同未來，而是保衛某一特定人的政權時，這種動員，這種本土論述，雖然名稱相同，卻是空洞的動員。 最後，人民天賦有什麼權利，我其實並不大知道，但是，用猜的，如果專業政客們真的愛權力，想要權力，而權力之所基，乃是人民的選票的話，他們在一定程度上卻又不得不關照人民的需求不是？人民利用政客為自身謀福利，政客利用人民為自身謀權力，在這套規則裡，如果人民選擇用信仰的，政客們就可以懶散。如果看不慣政客們的懶散，也許我們要兇一點。 Amelie: 賢知沒有搞革命啊，他只是搞音樂，說實話罷了。 標誌是個空的，肚子才是真的。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089975 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:59:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089973 lono35@yahoo.com.tw(amelie) 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:40:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089971 trust1021@ms15.url.com.tw(TRUST) 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:56:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089969 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:15:50 +0800 ...我選擇體貼些別人，體貼住在樂生的人，住貢寮的人，失業的人，每天加班的人，在外國打工（你們叫外勞）的異鄉人。 這類把注意力關注在善待週遭的語言或許會比"仇視"、"對立"來得更有教育影響力。 謝謝版主分享很有感覺的心情。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089967 warezs@gmail.com(貓兒) 文章回應 Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:06:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089965 文章回應 Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:12:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089963 perng.peypey@msa.hinet.net(pp) 文章回應 Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:19:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089961 perng.peypey@msa.hinet.net(pp) 文章回應 Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:35:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089959 文章回應 Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:22:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089957 文章回應 Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:59:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089955 文章回應 Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:55:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089953 perng.peypey@msa.hinet.net(pp) 文章回應 Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:30:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089951 文章回應 Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:29:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089949 文章回應 Sun, 23 Jul 2006 02:53:33 +0800 一人一題給民進黨未來兩年的考題，也是公民發聲的概念，比我這種顧影自憐的，更具實際操作性。 當然，長期講，我還是希望不只是影響，而能進一步瓜分就是，太長，也就先不談。 anarchi，我幫他？你要我幫他？你要我幫他什麼？他除了要我的選票，他又何時在意過我怎麼想了，既然如此，我能幫的已經幫過了－－也就是把他投去當總統－－當選之後，我倒想叫他幫幫人民。他做的事如果是我反對的，我幹嘛要幫他？你請繼續體貼他，我沒有意見。我自己是受夠了，我選擇體貼些別人，體貼住在樂生的人，住貢寮的人，失業的人，每天加班的人，在外國打工（你們叫外勞）的異鄉人。 清明？你另一腳是重陽還是反復？還沽名釣譽，高級知識份子咧？我在我部落格寫文章，釣了什麼譽？我又哪裡高級，哪裡有知識了？這篇文，只是低級的，不用知識的，從頭到尾都只有個人情緒的，提不出一點學理分析的，不體貼總統的，不顧大局的，一個壞學生的成長史，套句流行話，叫做一篇爛文。 至於英國美國博士不博士的，我聽不懂你指著我鼻子在罵誰，我說了誰在哪裡所以怎麼怎麼了嗎？而且，博士？我帶兒子煮飯兩年了，如果你要給我個博士當，也算家務勞動在新時代的新價值，想來不錯，我很願意去找你領取。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089947 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:47:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089945 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:53:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089943 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:30:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089941 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:03:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089939 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:34:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/1905617.html#comment-2694466]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089937 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:45:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089935 roach@exxxxx.org(ROACH) 文章回應 Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:21:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089933 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:28:15 +0800 http://www.esouth.org/modules/wordpress/?p=23 不知道有沒有不妥的地方？ 麻煩你上去確認一下喔！ 謝謝！]]> http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089931 chiuhogi@mail2000.com.tw(豆腐魚) 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:11:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089929 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:22:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089927 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:20:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089925 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:54:02 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089923 chiuhogi@mail2000.com.tw(豆腐魚) 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:04:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089921 文章回應 Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:36:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089919 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:36:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089917 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:31:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089915 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:26:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089913 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:26:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089911 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:48:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089909 jack0615.tw@yahoo.com.tw(阿舍) 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:59:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089907 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:39:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089905 cgs@ms2.url.com.tw(CGS) 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:17:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089903 ak70615@gmail.com(ak23) 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:03:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089901 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:59:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089899 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:21:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089897 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:00:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html http://blog.roodo.com/timojazz/archives/1908269.html#comment-8089895 roach@eroach.net(ROACH) 文章回應 Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:43:33 +0800