http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved >一個黨開了近半個月的檢討會，最後檢討的不是自己的黨為何沒有吸引力，而是去檢討一個產生候選人的機制問題，而且還要將投給自己的群眾一腳踢開 How did you get that conclusion? also, what is 排藍民調? and why would 廢排藍民調 make you think this way?"還要將投給自己的群眾一腳踢開"]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16313189 juowei630@gmail.com(Joe) 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:20:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16313013 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:51:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16312997 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:48:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16312955 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:41:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16311791 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:22:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16311783 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:20:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16311509 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:28:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/in_r5/archives/5847071.html 其次擴大檢討會議檢討了非常多的東西 排藍民調只是其中的一項 也沒啥討伐阿 會鬧大完全是因為游前主席阿]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16311447 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:15:13 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16311161 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:22:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16310989 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:47:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16309379 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:49:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16308723 文章回應 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 04:54:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16300707 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:48:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16300311 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:17:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16299957 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:38:28 +0800 去深綠=吸引中間選民? 況且中間選民對於政治本身是沒那麼關心或熱情的~要得到這些人的認同其實更困難~除非說有什麼有利於他們的政策或者基層上的關係~否則根本不可能黨說一句要轉中間路線這些人就出來投票了~要中間選票根本只能用做的哪有用講的~講到這裡跟深綠主體意識還是八竿子打不著啊 一個政黨要把得票發揮到最大值一定是深淺皆顧~不是這樣挖東牆補西牆~懷疑民進黨這群Losers是不是有人輸傻了~台灣政治就像A片~統媒就像A片導演~現在統媒要拍給政治痴漢看的新片叫"對自己顏射的政黨"XD]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16299825 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:48:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16299705 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:08:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16299519 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:04:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16298997 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:51:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16298281 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:57:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16298119 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:08:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16298065 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:52:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16298043 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:47:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16298041 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:46:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16297273 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:03:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16296957 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:16:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16296935 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 01:14:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiberlius/archives/5920805.html#comment-16296715 s7505123@hitmail.com(向天紫龍) 文章回應 Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:37:14 +0800