http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165735 文章回應 Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:54:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165733 文章回應 Mon, 11 Dec 2006 03:20:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165731 文章回應 Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:31:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165729 文章回應 Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:30:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165727 文章回應 Sun, 10 Dec 2006 10:33:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165725 文章回應 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:12:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165723 文章回應 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:11:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165721 文章回應 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:08:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165719 文章回應 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 17:07:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165717 文章回應 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 12:06:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165715 文章回應 Sat, 09 Dec 2006 01:22:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165713 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:44:44 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165711 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:19:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165709 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:23:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165707 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:58:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165705 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:53:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165703 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:42:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165701 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:31:18 +0800 無聊到自己左腳跟右腳互毆著呢！ 是呀！是呀！ 也因為他們的腳不夠靈活，毆得很難看。 在被判上貪污、毀謗等罪嫌後，只好運用他們全身唯一有功能的腳，「走路」到中國逃避刑罰。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165699 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:09:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165697 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:21:02 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165695 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:14:04 +0800 >因為他們根本不知道他們刪除的預算裡面包含了這些項目 了不起，這樣的理由也敢說出口....]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165693 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:49:02 +0800 所以砍了他們認為已經有的部分......但不看預算書的立委當然不會知道，他們認為已經有的部分，就整合在他們砍掉的部分裡面...... 恩，果然拿錢不做事，正是貪腐集團的本色啊～]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165691 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:44:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165689 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 03:33:00 +0800 立委們大喊冤枉，因為他們根本不知道他們刪除的預算裡面包含了這些項目 這是什麼爛態度？ 刪預算卻不知道他們在刪什麼預算？！ 果然是一群立法瞎子。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165687 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:56:53 +0800 >果然應驗了一句老話 最愚蠢的答案，往往就是正確的答案... 沒錯，就是降子，因為我們解釋的是愚蠢的人的行為啊！]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165685 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:15:11 +0800 >因為他們根本不知道他們刪除的預算裡面包含了這些項目 之前還懷疑他們為了鬥爭而有意阻止就業率降低勒 果然應驗了一句老話 最愚蠢的答案，往往就是正確的答案...]]> http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html http://blog.roodo.com/tiat/archives/2554454.html#comment-5165683 文章回應 Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:53:08 +0800