http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15831779 文章回應 Sat, 23 Feb 2008 19:53:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15831585 文章回應 Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:41:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15831509 文章回應 Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:00:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15831251 文章回應 Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:50:01 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15828083 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:01:43 +0800 >恐怕問題是我們自己，是我們曾經認為民進黨象徵民主、自由、進 >>步、清廉，結果在今天感到受騙而採取批判態度的人，以及民進黨內>>被黨內當權派排除，所以就開始檢討反省的人，忽然間警覺到民進黨>>的劣質。 奇怪，我看石老師十幾年來的文章，一路走來始終如一的批判民進黨，怎麼今天才感到民進黨劣質？ 到底是以前的石老師是真的石老師，還是現在的石老師才是真的石老師，真可說是：門外有四十四隻石獅子，不知是四十四隻死獅子？還是四十四隻十獅子？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15827903 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:29:01 +0800 >恐怕問題是我們自己，是我們曾經認為民進黨象徵民主、自由、進 >>步、清廉，結果在今天感到受騙而採取批判態度的人，以及民進黨內>>被黨內當權派排除，所以就開始檢討反省的人，忽然間警覺到民進黨>>的劣質。 奇怪，我看石老師十幾年來的文章，一路走來始終如一的批判民進黨，怎麼今天才感到民進黨劣質？ 到底是以前的石老師是真的石老師，還是現在的石老師才是真的石老師，真可說是：門外有四十四隻石獅子，不知是四十四隻死獅子？還是四十四隻十獅子？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15827901 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:28:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15827709 whsyu@pighead.cc(一綱一本委員會 委員長) 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:51:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15827005 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:36:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826865 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:03:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826859 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:00:02 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826649 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:12:13 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826629 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:08:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826549 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:52:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826533 whsyu@pighead.cc(一綱一本委員會 委員長) 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:49:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15826167 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:21:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15825619 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:05:59 +0800 http://www.taiwantribune.com/editorial/2008/02/08/2192editorial/ 馬英九在紐約大學及哈佛大學法學院，攻讀國際法，而非培養律師的 JD 課程，在美國工作經歷只限於波士頓國家 銀行法制室「顧問」、紐約柯爾與戴茲法律事務所及「馬里蘭大學法學院研究顧問」，時間都在一九八○到一九八一年。 銀行部份顯然是招商性質，紐約律師樓他承認只是「實習」，而馬里蘭大學部份也只是在他的「恩師」丘宏達籌 款設立的東亞法律研究方案、台灣國際法年鑑出版中心掛名，撰寫他的反台獨報告。以如此背景回台灣便出任蔣 經國的總統府第一局副局長、國民黨副秘書長，成為戒嚴體制共犯要角，也培養出他不食人間煙火的傲慢與優越感。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15825017 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:55:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15824999 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:52:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15824833 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:16:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15824607 文章回應 Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:56:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15823199 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:39:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15822501 whsyu@pighead.cc(一綱一本委員會 委員長) 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:05:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15822195 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:20:39 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15821807 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:42:26 +0800 這不是民進黨在野幹過的事嗎 哇哇哇～又在學人說話了耶.........XD 唉啊～史帝芬，這種丁丁可是用來練機車的好物啊，要跟上啊.......XD]]> http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15821337 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:28:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15821299 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:23:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15821275 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:18:53 +0800 這不是民進黨在野幹過的事嗎]]> http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15821271 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:16:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15821019 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:17:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15820999 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:12:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15820929 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:57:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15820921 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:56:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15820647 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:26:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15820495 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:07:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15819879 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:24:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15819821 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:14:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15818657 文章回應 Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:39:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15816691 文章回應 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:51:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15816675 文章回應 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:49:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html http://blog.roodo.com/rpot/archives/5570397.html#comment-15816507 文章回應 Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:28:05 +0800