March 24,2008

陳水扁的失敗

英國<經濟學人>評論這次台灣大選,結論認為,國民黨內派系複雜,馬在黨內的權力基礎脆弱,此外,馬在馬家女多於男的教養下,謙順有餘,果決不夠,馬英九必須IN起來:
At home, the chief challenge for the soft-spoken Mr Ma is to assert control within a party, full of political thugs, in which he lacks a powerful base. Here he may struggle. Preferring the company of scholars and a family life rich in women (mother, wife, three sisters and two daughters) but no men, Mr Ma is not cut out for strong-arming, and at the least will need loyal henchmen to help him. In the election, he showed voters his gentle, conciliatory side. Just to succeed within his own party, let alone stand up to future Chinese bullying, he will need to show his grit.

<經濟學人>其它論點則平平:

1.陳水扁八年執政無啥表現
eight years of lacklustre rule under President Chen Shui-bian

2.2000年陳水扁以台灣獨立為訴求勝選後,為求台灣獨立不惜犠牲一切,甚至激怒美國也在所不惜
Yet Mr Chen soon appeared to insist on this identity at the expense of anything else. His agitation for formal Taiwanese independence riled not just China, but the United States, Taiwan’s protector.

3.令人訝異的是,<經濟學人>用ruthless來形容國民黨
the KMT’s famously ruthless machine did everything to get him there.


Posted by perspectives at 樂多Roodo! │08:06 │回應(1)引用(0)選_總統
樂多分類:新聞評論 共同主題:政治觀點 工具:編輯本文
Ads by Roodo! 

引用URL

http://cgi.blog.roodo.com/trackback/5745033
回應文章
你怎麼會『訝異』經濟學人用無情的,殘忍的(ruthless)來形容國民黨?你看得出普丁的醜陋,卻訝異別人批評國民黨無情、殘忍;想來你是與國民黨的距離太近了。
國民黨過去五十多年執政裡,在臺灣義務教育上剝奪臺灣人認知臺灣史、地的權利,這是國民黨對臺灣文化的ruthless;過去八年,國民黨不承認陳水扁總統代表的政府,立院在軍購、教育、民生議題的阻擋,這是在政權上漠視的ruthless;龐大的黨產用於競選的文宣廣告....你不覺得這些都跟普丁的政權非常相似?看來經濟學人的觀察直指國民黨的核心精神,只能用ruthless來形容國民黨才真正確。這些都還沒牽涉二二八、白色恐怖,殺人事件喔。
Posted by 知鳥 at March 26,2008 12:02