http://blog.roodo.com/neocon zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html#comment-19976727 最新文章回應 Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:11:32 +0800 visura on line [URL=http://www.wertino.cn/kundalini] kundalini [/URL] kundalini [URL=http://www.wertino.cn/fiera-di-genova] fiera di genova [/URL] fiera di genova ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html#comment-16646883 最新文章回應 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:47:54 +0800 http://progressive-auto-insurance.puxsz.info/ ">progressive auto insurance auto insurance auctions discount auto insurance auto insurance texas auto insurance california progressive auto insurance]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454741.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454741.html#comment-9736885 最新文章回應 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:41:58 +0800 been http://freewebs.com/bureto/06/sitemap20.html [url=http://freewebs.com/bureto/13/sitemap14.html ]my[/url] eyes http://freewebs.com/bureto/07/sitemap8.html [url=http://freewebs.com/bureto/01/sitemap18.html ]shall[/url] great http://freewebs.com/bureto/14/sitemap9.html [url=http://freewebs.com/bureto/01/sitemap20.html ]CHAPTER[/url] tiffozo]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372102.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372102.html#comment-9256517 最新文章回應 Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:11:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2522912.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2522912.html#comment-8151519 最新文章回應 Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:39:59 +0800 http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece Meet the world's top destroyer of the environment. It is not the car, or the plane,or even George Bush: it is the cow. A United Nations report has identified the world's rapidly growing herds of cattle as the greatest threat to the climate, forests and wildlife. And they are blamed for a host of other environmental crimes, from acid rain to the introduction of alien species, from producing deserts to creating dead zones in the oceans, from poisoning rivers and drinking water to destroying coral reefs. The 400-page report by the Food and Agricultural Organisation, entitled Livestock's Long Shadow, also surveys the damage done by sheep, chickens, pigs and goats. But in almost every case, the world's 1.5 billion cattle are most to blame. Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together. Burning fuel to produce fertiliser to grow feed, to produce meat and to transport it - and clearing vegetation for grazing - produces 9 per cent of all emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. And their wind and manure emit more than one third of emissions of another, methane, which warms the world 20 times faster than carbon dioxide. Livestock also produces more than 100 other polluting gases, including more than two-thirds of the world's emissions of ammonia, one of the main causes of acid rain. Ranching, the report adds, is "the major driver of deforestation" worldwide, and overgrazing is turning a fifth of all pastures and ranges into desert.Cows also soak up vast amounts of water: it takes a staggering 990 litres of water to produce one litre of milk. Wastes from feedlots and fertilisers used to grow their feed overnourish water, causing weeds to choke all other life. And the pesticides, antibiotics and hormones used to treat them get into drinking water and endanger human health. The pollution washes down to the sea, killing coral reefs and creating "dead zones" devoid of life. One is up to 21,000sqkm, in the Gulf of Mexico, where much of the waste from US beef production is carried down the Mississippi. The report concludes that, unless drastic changes are made, the massive damage done by livestock will more than double by 2050, as demand for meat increases.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2522912.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2522912.html#comment-8151517 最新文章回應 Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:33:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2522912.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2522912.html#comment-8151515 最新文章回應 Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:42:14 +0800 >台灣或許不能算是"大"的市場，但也絕對不小 One thing I really don't like about 民進黨 is how they sabotaged Taiwan economics. Obviously, holding onto the power is more important than promoting the economic growth for them. Taiwan was ahead of South Korea in the economical growth back in the '80. Now South Korea has evolved into an economical power house in the world, but Taiwan 原地踏步. You know why nobody give a damn about recognizing Taiwan? When your neighbors have something better to offer, nobody would bother knocking on your door. Whining about your miserable past while doing whatever you can to defend your power won't get you anywhere. You want to recognized? Be a force!! You are not entitled to the recognition. You have to earn it.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454669.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454669.html#comment-8151507 最新文章回應 Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:54:21 +0800 >曼哈頓竟有許多地區有超過20%的居民從事 arts, design, entertainment, sports 等行業, From the business point of view, we call them "overhead"; from the conservative's point of view, we call them "bloodsuckers", whose only role is to consume. Actually, I take that back, they at least help moving the money around, by attenuating it along the way.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2480623.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2480623.html#comment-8151513 最新文章回應 Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:33:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2480623.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2480623.html#comment-8151511 最新文章回應 Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:26:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454669.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454669.html#comment-8151505 最新文章回應 Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:40:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151467 最新文章回應 Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:18:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151465 最新文章回應 Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:05:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151463 最新文章回應 Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:02:13 +0800 "從美國期中選舉結果，看全球化與保護主義" Sounds and Fury 的 "經濟民粹主義的啟示"]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454669.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2454669.html#comment-8151503 最新文章回應 Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:59:12 +0800 街車呢. 只是後來那種只適合"線性發展"的交通工具被較適合一般城市/鄉鎮網狀發展的公共汽車所取代了. 我所住的威郡有非常發達的公共交通網, 有三條鐵路通往曼哈頓的通勤火車網, 還有四通八達, 綿密的巴士網. 通勤火車很貴(單程到曼哈頓的票從 $5 到 $17不等), 但乘坐率很高, 巴士很便宜(單程 $1.75)但乘坐率很低, 為什麼? 很簡單, 市場需求. 威郡巴士本郡每年都補助了很多錢, 因為那是窮人及老人在使用的, 所以補助並不會帶來立即的好處. 通勤火車雖然貴, 還是需要州政府補助, 州政府補助是有如意算盤的, 因他會提高房屋價值, 而房屋價值除了會立即反映在 property tax 上(大部分的居民一年光property tax就要1-2萬美元), 便利的交通也會吸引在曼哈頓高收入的族群從紐澤西,或康州搬入, 而eventually增加州政府稅收. 關於鄉民的質疑頗有道理, 我不知道台北的捷運是否有經過此評估? 我的直覺是, 可能沒有. 首先, 台灣的property tax低的不像話, 就算沿線房屋增值, property tax也怕增加不了太多稅收. 至於搶人? 如果是中央政府買單, 把人從桃園搶過來台北, 有任何意義嗎?]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151461 最新文章回應 Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:48:19 +0800 所以最後還是選擇坐了 也可能還是坐車子爽快，時間不重要->所以還是開車塞在路上 這2種都在所有的選項中作了對他們而言效益最大的選擇， 但是就「舒適度」或「生活品質」函數而言，卻不見得是最大的 這個論述主要是在質疑「蓋捷運->生活品質必然會更好」的觀點]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151459 最新文章回應 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 15:17:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151457 最新文章回應 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:10:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151455 最新文章回應 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 14:01:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151453 最新文章回應 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 02:39:13 +0800