向右轉, 向前走 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved 回應：美國是環保模範生? http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-21325023 最新文章回應 Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:44:51 +0800 回應：楊偉中同志的錯誤 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2376933.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2376933.html#comment-20882397 最新文章回應 Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:57:10 +0800 回應：美國右派看全球暖化 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html#comment-19976727 最新文章回應 Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:11:32 +0800 回應：唉唉唉~ http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html#comment-8151391 最新文章回應 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 07:00:02 +0800 回應：死亡經濟學 So the existence of such funds and the fact that some investors' willingness to put their money in them basically says that, people do not always behave to seek the maximum economic benefit? Doesn’t this say something about the"validity of the Efficient market hypothesis"?]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2385935.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2385935.html#comment-8151421 最新文章回應 Wed, 01 Nov 2006 09:50:54 +0800 回應：美國是環保模範生? http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2397385.html#comment-8151453 最新文章回應 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 02:39:13 +0800 回應：'Refuse-to-Lose' Crowd http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/samhain-deGaul/ 這blog政治哲學走向也是相當有趣的 板主不妨參考
謝謝鄉民, "亞歷桑德拉公主"跟"諸神的黃昏"的確是我的必讀部落格 你說的沒錯, 我們不要被政客或政黨綁架. 民進黨泡沫化如能催生一個本土務實右派政黨,對台灣未嘗不是一件好事. 阿峰
]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2438854.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2438854.html#comment-8151483 最新文章回應 Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:51:22 +0800 回應：你Carbon Neutral嗎? >曼哈頓竟有許多地區有超過20%的居民從事 arts, design, entertainment, sports 等行業, From the business point of view, we call them "overhead"; from the conservative's point of view, we call them "bloodsuckers", whose only role is to consume. Actually, I take that back, they at least help moving the money around, by attenuating it along the way.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2480623.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2480623.html#comment-8151513 最新文章回應 Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:33:55 +0800 回應：立柏曼輸了 been http://freewebs.com/bureto/06/sitemap20.html [url=http://freewebs.com/bureto/13/sitemap14.html ]my[/url] eyes http://freewebs.com/bureto/07/sitemap8.html [url=http://freewebs.com/bureto/01/sitemap18.html ]shall[/url] great http://freewebs.com/bureto/14/sitemap9.html [url=http://freewebs.com/bureto/01/sitemap20.html ]CHAPTER[/url] tiffozo]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372102.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372102.html#comment-9256517 最新文章回應 Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:11:35 +0800 回應：唉唉唉~ Welcome back! 很高興那個"英雄"終於給自己一個台階下; 人民也終於有個休養生息的機會 ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html#comment-8151361 最新文章回應 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 01:29:47 +0800 回應：唉唉唉~ http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html#comment-8151359 最新文章回應 Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:58:29 +0800 回應：火星國選總統 IF you know where to find/utilize such "arbitrage". The current moral standard of human beings is not up to the point that we selflessly share the wealth. Those have-nots covet what haves have, and those have-alls can easily share with the have-nots while not making a dent on their live styles. Both groups got nothing to lose by declaring "share the wealth". What would happen to those of us in the middle, who have a lot to lose, if the whole country turn into socialism? 這就是中產階級的困境, it's not a bad idea to share, but it's just impossible to share them without eliminating the incentive to create wealth for the whole society, and that will set us back to the dark ages. We human beings in the 21th century are still quite primitive. Gathering wealth is one of the major motivations in life. After all, wealth gives you physical and psychological security. It may not bring you joy but at least you perceive that your life will be better off with more wealth. There was a StarTrek movie coming out a few years ago: it basically displays a quantum leap in the human moral development after humans interface with advanced aliens, then the advanced technologies allow humans to easily access to all material needs. Once you take the material out of the equation, you can really fulfill the idea of sharing. Then there comes the world peace(urrh, I mean Peace on earth) 有限的資源是爲什麼會有人開始研究經濟學的原因. 我想天堂應該沒有這個問題吧 ;-) Anyway, it's just my thought. Thanks for your input, again; they are always insightful! ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372128.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372128.html#comment-8151235 最新文章回應 Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:53:15 +0800 回應：火星國選總統 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372128.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372128.html#comment-8151237 最新文章回應 Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:04:21 +0800 回應：Young America >A nation of aging, childless adults is less likely to act like responsible adults, whose primary concerns center on the fate of their offspring and their offspring's offspring. Amen. >>America has flourished not because of the geniuses in Washington but due to its Constitution, fertile land mass, egalitarianism, entrepreneurship, unique spiritual vitality, and attachment to local community and family.... Beautiful. It's a very nice article, Cliff. I actually tried to finish reading it while I had my breakfast this morning. Unfortunately, I was in a rush and I had to braid Sarah's hair. Did you read one of yesterday's columns? the Nobel economy prize winner's tax article. That was a very interesting one indeed. You braided Sarah's hair? Wow, how nice! No, I was too busy yesterday. But I will pick up the newspaper tonight to read it over. Thanks for the tip. ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372162.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372162.html#comment-8151267 最新文章回應 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:13:50 +0800 回應：Young America "人太多"並不適用於已發展國家,像美國日本或歐洲. 是不是生小孩也是爲人類文明發展盡一份力呢? I will try to write something about the trip, but honestly, i am not good at giving travel details. the only thing matters is that i did enjoy the trip. ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372162.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372162.html#comment-8151269 最新文章回應 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 01:47:24 +0800 回應：美國右派看全球暖化 >What really concerns me is how politicians and capitalists work hand in hand to propagate specific ideology Power corrupts. Often time it's those, who surround the politicians and capitalists, influencing the ideology.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html#comment-8151299 最新文章回應 Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:24:31 +0800 回應：美國右派看全球暖化 http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372168.html#comment-8151301 最新文章回應 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:28:19 +0800 回應：唉唉唉~ 要不是這次倒布希運動草草收場, 他們可能會說台灣紅潮也「啟蒙」了 "World Can't Wait" 吧 ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html#comment-8151327 最新文章回應 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 11:05:29 +0800 回應：唉唉唉~ I think 95% of all the foreign non-English-speaking media are pro-democrat. They fear the Empire, and that's understandable. I'll probably write another post about this interesting phenomena. ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372419.html#comment-8151329 最新文章回應 Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:38:45 +0800 回應：全球暖化，焉知非福 請問你是根據哪一項科學研究推論蟬,蝴蝶, 鳥等生物會在全球暖化攝氏2度後消失? 妳知道上列生物的出現比人類久吧, 他們對環境的適應不會輸我們人類, 放心好了. ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372104.html http://blog.roodo.com/neocon/archives/2372104.html#comment-8151205 最新文章回應 Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:56:13 +0800