<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>言いたいことはここだけで-趣味話題</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/cat_334899.html</link>
<description>
生活感想、近況報告、不吐不快....還有很多很多~~都在這裡</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/cat_334899.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>下次投票記得看政見啊!</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			就說台灣人在投票從來不看政見的嘛這樣要拼經濟啊?我看還是四年後再說吧!以下轉貼媒抗諸羅山城網友的文章看完不要哭喔，下次選總統的時候記得先看政見再投票喔！馬蕭的柏拉圖式經濟政策馬蕭的抑制物價，與國民所得達30000美金，是衝突的政見；魚與熊掌不可兼得。 想要抑制物價，就必須拋棄3萬美金；想要3萬美金，就必須拋棄物價。總不能「又要馬兒跑，又要馬兒不吃草」吧? 經濟學裡有一名詞「柏拉圖最適配置」，這是完全競爭狀態下資源及財貨處於最佳效率的配置狀態，此時的總效用也是極大化的。 但它必須有三個條件： (1)技術效率：指資本與勞動等生產因素之邊際技術替代率在各財貨之生產上均相等。(2)消費效率：指消費者個別之間對於財貨消費之邊際替代率相等。 (3)配置效率：指生產面之邊際轉換率與消費面之邊際替代率相等，透過市場機能之運作，即可得財貨之邊際成本等於其相對價格。 但是誰相信真有「柏拉圖境界」的存在? 這簡直是孔夫子虛幻的「世界大同」幻想！ 就連古典自由經濟學家，都說這是一種不可能達到的理想(它們自己提出的學術理論，卻又自己覺得不可能會發生)，因此迷戀古典自由經濟主義，就同等於在迷戀看小說一樣。(滿足人心爽快而已) 但經濟學家不拿來用，發明這理論有啥屁用? 有，當然有！就給愛唬爛的政治人物，選舉時拿出來用。首推舉例~~馬蕭。(古今中外，絕無僅有的一對寶) 回顧他們選前最耐人尋味的經濟政見：(注意看，非常偉大！) 1. 落實自由經濟，反對政府干預，一切交由市場機制來決定物價。 2. 年所得達3萬美金 3. 經濟成長率每年6% 4. 股市達20000點 5. 平穩物價 以下解析那700多萬張熱愛「拼經濟」的人眼睛瞎在那，頭殼裝豆腐： (1)與(5)直接抵觸； (2)也與(5)直接抵觸； 既然(2)(5)抵觸，第(3)點要完成也有點勉強； 唯有(4)比較獨立一點，但是(4)要是達成，也難保不牽引著物價上漲，那麼(5)就會因為(4)的出現而抵觸。 這些政見很顯然地，「柏拉圖」看太多！完美地塑造馬蕭神格化地位。 以台灣情況， 聰明的人應該選擇「抑制物價，拋棄3萬美元」，穩穩過生活； 不經大腦思考的人「追求3萬美元，拋棄物價」，好戲在後頭。 前者造就了544萬張選票，後者卻也創造了765萬張選票。 一個人間極品、零缺點的馬英九，提出了極品、幻想零缺點的「柏拉圖境界」；人類社會，果然還是喜歡「外觀美化」的東西。 如果真有「柏拉圖」發生，那麼也代表經濟浩劫即將來到！套用古典經濟學邊際效用理論：零缺點的完美形態一發生問題，邊際效用的遞減也是無窮大。&nbsp; 眉批: 我想，有基本經濟學概念的人，都會知道這五項支票是互相牴觸的。咦？蕭萬長不是財經專家嗎？怎麼會設計出這種政見？魯肇忠都說了，他以往提出的計劃不是無法實現就是失敗的。台大國貿系畢業的魯肇忠，難道會比政大外交系畢業的蕭萬長不懂經濟嗎？看完有沒有所託非人欲哭無淚的感覺？下次投票前記得看政見就好了。這四年，大家就只好忍耐一下吧！因為現在後悔也來不及了！
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p>就說台灣人在投票從來不看政見的嘛<br />這樣要拼經濟啊?我看還是四年後再說吧!<br /><br />以下轉貼媒抗諸羅山城網友的文章<br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">看完不要哭喔，下次選總統的時候記得先看政見再投票喔！</span></span></p><strong><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">馬蕭的柏拉圖式經濟政策</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"></span></span></strong><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt"><br />馬蕭的抑制物價，與國民所得達</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">30000</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">美金，是衝突的政見；魚與熊掌不可兼得。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">想要抑制物價，就必須拋棄</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">3</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬美金；想要</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">3</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬美金，就必須拋棄物價。總不能「又要馬兒跑，又要馬兒不吃草」吧</span></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt">?</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"> </span></span></font><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">經濟學裡有一名詞「<span style="color: blue">柏拉圖最適配置</span>」，這是完全競爭狀態下資源及財貨處於最佳效率的配置狀態，此時的總效用也是極大化的。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">但它必須有三個條件：</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(1)</font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">技術效率：</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">指資本與勞動等生產因素之邊際技術替代率在各財貨之生產上均相等。<br /></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(2)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">消費效率：</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">指消費者個別之間對於財貨消費之邊際替代率相等。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(3)</font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">配置效率：</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">指生產面之邊際轉換率與消費面之邊際替代率相等，透過市場機能之運作，即可得財貨之邊際成本等於其相對價格。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">但是誰相信真有「<span style="color: blue">柏拉圖境界</span>」的存在</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">? </font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">這簡直是孔夫子虛幻的「<span style="color: red">世界大同</span>」幻想！</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">就連古典自由經濟學家，都說這是一種不可能達到的理想</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">它們自己提出的學術理論，卻又自己覺得不可能會發生</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">，因此迷戀古典自由經濟主義，就同等於在迷戀看小說一樣。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">滿足人心爽快而已</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">) </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">但經濟學家不拿來用，發明這理論有啥屁用</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">? </font></span></span><span><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">有，當然有！就給愛唬爛的政治人物，選舉時拿出來用。<span style="color: red">首推舉例</span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">~~</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">馬蕭。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">古今中外，絕無僅有的一對寶</span></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt">)</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"> </span></span></font><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">回顧他們選前最耐人尋味的經濟政見<span style="color: red">：</span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">注意看，非常偉大！</span></span><font face="Times New Roman"><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: red; letter-spacing: 0pt">)</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"> </span></span></font><span><br /><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">1. </font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">落實自由經濟，反對政府干預，一切交由市場機制來決定物價。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">2. </font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">年所得達</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">3</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬美金</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">3. </font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">經濟成長率每年</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">6% </font></span></span><span><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">4. </font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">股市達</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">20000</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">點</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">5. </font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">平穩物價</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">以下解析那</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">700</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">多萬張熱愛「拼經濟」的人眼睛瞎在那，頭殼裝豆腐：</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(1)</font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">與</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(5)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">直接抵觸；</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(2)</font></span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">也與</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(5)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">直接抵觸；</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">既然</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(2)(5)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">抵觸，第</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(3)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">點要完成也有點勉強；</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">唯有</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(4)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">比較獨立一點，但是</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(4)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">要是達成，也難保不牽引著物價上漲，那麼</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(5)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">就會因為</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">(4)</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">的出現而抵觸。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">這些政見很顯然地，「柏拉圖」看太多！完美地塑造馬蕭神格化地位。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">以台灣情況，</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">聰明的人應該選擇「<span style="color: green">抑制物價，拋棄</span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: green; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">3</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: green; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬美元</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">」，穩穩過生活；</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">不經大腦思考的人「<span style="color: blue">追求</span></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">3</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="color: blue; font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬美元，拋棄物價</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">」，好戲在後頭。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">前者造就了</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">544</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬張選票，後者卻也創造了</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">765</font></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">萬張選票。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">一個人間極品、零缺點的馬英九，提出了極品、幻想零缺點的「柏拉圖境界」；人類社會，果然還是喜歡「外觀美化」的東西。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></span></span><span><br /><br /></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">如果真有「柏拉圖」發生，那麼也代表經濟浩劫即將來到！套用古典經濟學邊際效用理論：零缺點的完美形態一發生問題，邊際效用的遞減也是無窮大。</span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"></span></span><span class="postbody1"><span style="letter-spacing: 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman">&nbsp;</font></span></span> <p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span class="postbody1"><span style="font-family: 新細明體; letter-spacing: 0pt">眉批: 我想，有基本經濟學概念的人，都會知道這五項支票是互相牴觸的。咦？蕭萬長不是財經專家嗎？怎麼會設計出這種政見？魯肇忠都說了，他以往提出的計劃不是無法實現就是失敗的。台大國貿系畢業的魯肇忠，難道會比政大外交系畢業的蕭萬長不懂經濟嗎？看完有沒有所託非人欲哭無淚的感覺？下次投票前記得看政見就好了。這四年，大家就只好忍耐一下吧！因為現在後悔也來不及了！</span></span></p><br />
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/5764281.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/5764281.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:37:11 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>真是服了日本人</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			http://www.chunmin.com/archives/78這個部落格寫的很有趣關於中國黑心包子的問題日本人那種科學精神真的值得人佩服雖然有點kuso但也很有趣有空可以瞧瞧&nbsp;&nbsp;
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p><a href="http://www.chunmin.com/archives/78">http://www.chunmin.com/archives/78</a></p><p>這個部落格寫的</p><p>很有趣</p><p>關於中國黑心包子的問題</p><p>日本人那種科學精神真的值得人佩服</p><p>雖然有點kuso但也很有趣</p><p>有空可以瞧瞧&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3703609.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3703609.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:49:05 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>喔~~這個實在太好笑~太有才啦</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			來來來趕快來看這支最新的flash &quot;倒退嚕&quot;真是太天才啦~~&quot;My Angel&quot;還真的多虧他想的出來人家剛拍了一支廣告向前走他就馬上來個&quot;倒退嚕&quot;送給他真是聯想力豐富啊~~太崇拜了很經典喔大家記得要告訴大家網址就在馬小九部落格http://www.wretch.cc/blog/ma1Dog&amp;article_id=17557809youtube上也看得到我最近每天都會去馬小九那裡看看他的漫畫真的都很好笑ㄋㄟ&nbsp;
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p>來來來</p><p>趕快來看這支最新的flash &quot;倒退嚕&quot;</p><p>真是太天才啦~~&quot;My Angel&quot;還真的多虧他想的出來</p><p>人家剛拍了一支廣告向前走</p><p>他就馬上來個&quot;倒退嚕&quot;送給他</p><p>真是聯想力豐富啊~~太崇拜了</p><p>很經典喔</p><p>大家記得要告訴大家</p><p>網址就在馬小九部落格</p><p><a href="http://www.wretch.cc/blog/ma1Dog&amp;article_id=17557809">http://www.wretch.cc/blog/ma1Dog&amp;article_id=17557809</a></p><p>youtube上也看得到</p><p>我最近每天都會去馬小九那裡看看</p><p>他的漫畫真的都很好笑ㄋㄟ</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3549125.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3549125.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:16:05 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>中國人搞KUSO還真不是蓋的...連迪士尼樂園都有假的....</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkhf493sX_c&nbsp;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V68HiXdwwvs&nbsp;這是在YOUTUBE上看到的日本電視台新聞片段可以說是令人瞠目結舌了多拉A夢,KITTY,跟迪士尼樂園的卡通人物全都集合在一起這叫做什麼?具有中國特色的樂園嗎?真是笑死人了第二則畫面下面還有很多回應也有中國的憤青在胡說八道,連這種事情也要扯上日軍侵華好像日本人永生永世都得任他們踐踏似的還說什麼日本人也是抄襲中國的漢字.....要道歉得日本先道歉什麼東西啊?這種侵害版權的事情,豈是道歉就可以的呀?更何況迪士尼是美國的,又不是日本的最好笑的是,那家樂園的負責人竟然說,那隻老鼠不是MICKEY,是他們自己設計的大耳貓????啥時貓長成那樣啦???睜著眼睛說瞎話果然是中國人的特長!!甘拜下風!!而且還說他們的人物都是從格林童話裡面來的,看不出來多啦A夢跟格林童話有什麼關係?格林童話裡面有沒耳朵的機器貓嗎???這就是SHE歌裡面說的好聰明的中國人嗎??呵呵,跟丁丁是個人才差不多一樣KUSO~~~這家樂園還是國營的咧~~下面的回應裡有人說這是PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF COPY,我想它們改名叫PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF KUSO也是不錯滴啦......&nbsp;&nbsp;
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkhf493sX_c">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkhf493sX_c</a></p><p>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V68HiXdwwvs">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V68HiXdwwvs</a></p><p>&nbsp;這是在YOUTUBE上看到的日本電視台新聞片段</p><p>可以說是令人瞠目結舌了</p><p>多拉A夢,KITTY,跟迪士尼樂園的卡通人物全都集合在一起</p><p>這叫做什麼?具有中國特色的樂園嗎?</p><p>真是笑死人了</p><p>第二則畫面下面還有很多回應</p><p>也有中國的憤青在胡說八道,連這種事情也要扯上日軍侵華</p><p>好像日本人永生永世都得任他們踐踏似的</p><p>還說什麼日本人也是抄襲中國的漢字.....要道歉得日本先道歉</p><p>什麼東西啊?這種侵害版權的事情,豈是道歉就可以的呀?</p><p>更何況迪士尼是美國的,又不是日本的</p><p>最好笑的是,那家樂園的負責人竟然說,那隻老鼠不是MICKEY,是他們自己設計的大耳貓????啥時貓長成那樣啦???睜著眼睛說瞎話果然是中國人的特長!!甘拜下風!!而且還說他們的人物都是從格林童話裡面來的,看不出來多啦A夢跟格林童話有什麼關係?格林童話裡面有沒耳朵的機器貓嗎???</p><p>這就是SHE歌裡面說的好聰明的中國人嗎??呵呵,跟丁丁是個人才差不多一樣KUSO~~~這家樂園還是國營的咧~~</p><p>下面的回應裡有人說這是PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF COPY,我想它們改名叫PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF KUSO也是不錯滴啦......</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3189511.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3189511.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:03:21 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>我是一片雲</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="100" height="100"><param name="src" value="http://tw.video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=441336" /><param name="width" value="100" /><param name="height" value="100" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://tw.video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=441336" width="100" height="100"></embed></object><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="425" height="350"><param name="width" value="425" /><param name="height" value="350" /><param name="flashvars" value="id=2473669&amp;emailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Ftw.video.yahoo.com%2Futil%2Fmail%3Fei%3DUTF-8%26vid%3D441336&amp;imUrl=http%25253A%25252F%25252Ftw.video.yahoo.com%25252Fvideo%25252Fplay%25253Fei%25253DUTF-8%252526vid%25253D441336&amp;imTitle=%2525E6%252588%252591%2525E6%252598%2525AF%2525E4%2525B8%252580%2525E7%252589%252587%2525E9%25259B%2525B2.wmv&amp;searchUrl=http://tw.video.yahoo.com/video/search?p=&amp;profileUrl=http://tw.video.yahoo.com/video/profile?yid=&amp;creatorValue=eDA2OTgzMTI3&amp;vid=441336" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" flashvars="id=2473669&amp;emailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Ftw.video.yahoo.com%2Futil%2Fmail%3Fei%3DUTF-8%26vid%3D441336&amp;imUrl=http%25253A%25252F%25252Ftw.video.yahoo.com%25252Fvideo%25252Fplay%25253Fei%25253DUTF-8%252526vid%25253D441336&amp;imTitle=%2525E6%252588%252591%2525E6%252598%2525AF%2525E4%2525B8%252580%2525E7%252589%252587%2525E9%25259B%2525B2.wmv&amp;searchUrl=http://tw.video.yahoo.com/video/search?p=&amp;profileUrl=http://tw.video.yahoo.com/video/profile?yid=&amp;creatorValue=eDA2OTgzMTI3&amp;vid=441336"></embed></object>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3119059.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3119059.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:57:14 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>終於給我發現我的偶像啦</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			在連結網站的部分追加了一個 &quot;南方獸學院&quot;這是昨天閒逛的時候發現的,站長是以前在媒抗經常看到的小明大大因為被媒抗幾次浸水桶之後,就沒看過他出現了今天意外發現很是驚喜,因為這位小明大大非常認真,我很喜歡看他寫的東西,邏輯清晰,分析又很一針見血,直搗要害,用詞又很犀利,最重要是他蒐集很多資料,而且契而不捨!我個人是滿喜歡這種風格的,也很佩服他的認真跟用心所以我都跟老公說,小明真是我的偶像啊!今天進樂多時,因為要轉換資料中間空黨就跑去亂逛,逛到年糕料理館的時候意外在回應的部分看到小明大大的回應,才發現了他的部落格,小明大大一樣認真的對抗媒體,對抗不公不義的又無恥的KMT,而且讀他的文字真的非常有趣,就放進了連結網站~~~有興趣的朋友可以去瞧瞧&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p>在連結網站的部分追加了一個 &quot;南方獸學院&quot;</p><p>這是昨天閒逛的時候發現的,站長是以前在媒抗經常看到的小明大大</p><p>因為被媒抗幾次浸水桶之後,就沒看過他出現了</p><p>今天意外發現很是驚喜,因為這位小明大大非常認真,我很喜歡看他寫的東西,邏輯清晰,分析又很一針見血,直搗要害,用詞又很犀利,最重要是他蒐集很多資料,而且契而不捨!我個人是滿喜歡這種風格的,也很佩服他的認真跟用心</p><p>所以我都跟老公說,小明真是我的偶像啊!今天進樂多時,因為要轉換資料中間空黨就跑去亂逛,逛到年糕料理館的時候意外在回應的部分看到小明大大的回應,才發現了他的部落格,小明大大一樣認真的對抗媒體,對抗不公不義的又無恥的KMT,而且讀他的文字真的非常有趣,就放進了連結網站~~~有興趣的朋友可以去瞧瞧</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3056637.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/3056637.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:56:33 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>一篇有趣的文章~~~李安是千古罪人??</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			真的是無意中發現的這篇文章看篇名好像在罵李安其實是在批評中國的三大&quot;名導&quot;正好頭號我之前就罵過他了這篇文章寫的很有趣有空可以去瞧瞧不過都是殘廢字體啦~~忍耐點吧!http://www.cchere.com/article/858853千古罪人是李安
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p>真的是無意中發現的這篇文章</p><p>看篇名好像在罵李安</p><p>其實是在批評中國的三大&quot;名導&quot;</p><p>正好頭號我之前就罵過他了</p><p>這篇文章寫的很有趣</p><p>有空可以去瞧瞧</p><p>不過都是殘廢字體啦~~忍耐點吧!</p><p><a href="http://www.cchere.com/article/858853">http://www.cchere.com/article/858853</a>千古罪人是李安</p>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/2975247.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/2975247.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:52:50 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>測試你的腦年齡~~~</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			無意中發現了這個測試大腦實際年齡的遊戲,非常好玩大家有空不妨試試自己的腦年齡是幾歲唷!&lt;遊戲一&gt;http://flashfabrica.com/f_learning/brain/brain.html先填入自己的實際年齡接下來就是考你的瞬間記憶力把出現在畫面上的數字按順序click出來這個測試我得到28歲的腦年齡唷^^&lt;遊戲二&gt;http://flashfabrica.com/f_learning/brain2/brain02.html數學題,填入正確的加減乘除符號我有幾題回答得慢了點得到31歲的腦年齡呵呵呵,總之都比實際年齡年輕許多真是開心 ^^你們要不要也試試看呢?有好成績要告訴我唷!!
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<p>無意中發現了這個測試大腦實際年齡的遊戲,非常好玩</p><p>大家有空不妨試試自己的腦年齡是幾歲唷!</p><p>&lt;遊戲一&gt;</p><p><a href="http://flashfabrica.com/f_learning/brain/brain.html">http://flashfabrica.com/f_learning/brain/brain.html</a></p><p>先填入自己的實際年齡</p><p>接下來就是考你的瞬間記憶力</p><p>把出現在畫面上的數字按順序click出來</p><p>這個測試我得到28歲的腦年齡唷^^</p><p>&lt;遊戲二&gt;</p><p><a href="http://flashfabrica.com/f_learning/brain2/brain02.html">http://flashfabrica.com/f_learning/brain2/brain02.html</a></p><p>數學題,填入正確的加減乘除符號</p><p>我有幾題回答得慢了點</p><p>得到31歲的腦年齡</p><p>呵呵呵,總之都比實際年齡年輕許多</p><p>真是開心 ^^</p><p>你們要不要也試試看呢?</p><p>有好成績要告訴我唷!!</p><p />
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/2892611.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/lovejthr/archives/2892611.html</guid>
	<category>趣味話題</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:57:16 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>