http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19206713 文章回應 Mon, 25 May 2009 17:03:15 +0800 >任何時候，帶著病原的人戴口罩都具有好的外部性，由此只能推論到「應該有更多人戴口罩」，無法推論到政府管制。政府管制並無法讓更多人戴口罩。 據我所知，口罩的功用是使戴著的人可以過濾外部的不好的東西。所以應為戴口罩的民眾可以防備潛藏帶原者的不好的外部性才是。而市場需求增加自然會導致價格上升，所以政府的管制只會造成價格的扭曲，而使得有人買不到口罩。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19190419 文章回應 Fri, 22 May 2009 21:10:30 +0800 首見 新流感疑似病患落跑 明明豬流感比很多疾病死亡率都低 政府還捨不得解除法定傳染病限制~ 還一律比照和平醫院模式先隔離再說~ 病人不落跑才怪~]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19110937 文章回應 Wed, 13 May 2009 12:04:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19089969 YukieChen@gmail.com(Yukie) 文章回應 Sun, 10 May 2009 18:05:20 +0800 尷尬！　有口罩沒貼紙無法上架 實在不知道這些官僚在想什麼?沒貼疾管局貼紙不能賣? 如果要轉賣把貼紙撕了不行嗎? 況且賣價幾乎跟市價一樣~ 有轉賣的價值嗎? 政府還是不要經營商業的好~ 連把囤積的口罩賣出來都搞不定!]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19058983 文章回應 Wed, 06 May 2009 16:11:24 +0800 http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/090506/8/1j0g6.html 爆笑的新聞...]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19058201 文章回應 Wed, 06 May 2009 14:25:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19044175 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 22:14:19 +0800 市售口罩價差高 消基會籲政府調查 這種場合消基會當然不能缺席! 新流感／200萬口罩緊急出倉配送　一包有5片賣30元 ~原來政府也屯積居奇~~ 不過這作法似乎比直接管制價格高明的多了, 既然台灣沒有疫情, 這種作法似乎政治意味大於實質!]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19044079 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 22:01:39 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19043497 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 20:34:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042777 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 18:27:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042681 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 18:08:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042659 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 18:04:13 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042353 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 16:53:54 +0800 200萬口罩要賣了！蘇俊斌：將以市價販售 看來國民黨玩弄起政治比起民進黨高明多了~]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042307 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 16:44:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042283 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 16:42:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19042219 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 16:30:27 +0800 台灣的衛生署…..]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19041279 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 15:00:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19041231 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 14:52:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040759 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 13:18:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040613 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 12:58:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040557 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 12:52:44 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040429 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 12:26:59 +0800 推了劉館長的文">，引來了若干回應。可是本喵沒學過經濟，怕誤解了本文的意思，亂解釋。請好心的館長有空在此回應即可，謝謝。:P]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040411 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 12:24:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040347 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 12:10:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19040135 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 11:40:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039499 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 10:08:41 +0800 防止不肖商人囤積哄抬口罩價格　高檢署發函嚴加查辦 我不知道高檢署用甚麼法律規定,發動國家刑事訴追權! 是公平交易法?還是醫事法?傳染病防治法? 個人才疏學淺實在找不到適用法律? 還是高檢署只是在下行政指導?]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039453 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 09:58:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039355 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 09:46:38 +0800 台灣的衛生署….. 彷彿是~恐慌，在政治瘟疫蔓延時 ~這本書的重演]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039337 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 09:43:52 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039313 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 09:40:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039281 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 09:35:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19039247 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 09:29:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19038245 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 05:23:57 +0800 > 所以他認為在那個當下，口罩有『準公共財』的特性，因此需要管制吧？ 任何時候，帶著病原的人戴口罩都具有好的外部性，由此只能推論到「應該有更多人戴口罩」，無法推論到政府管制。政府管制並無法讓更多人戴口罩。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19038235 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 05:21:10 +0800 辦一場曲水流觴宴、2.體循環與肺循環 看到學生被我唬的嘴巴開開的是我的樂趣啊！！:)]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19037551 YukieChen@gmail.com(Yukie) 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 01:30:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19037327 YukieChen@gmail.com(Yukie) 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 00:45:43 +0800 5/5釋200萬片口罩：口罩每天更有152萬片的生產力，但指揮中心已決定5月5日起釋出2百萬片口罩到四大超商。 目的是什麼？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19037281 文章回應 Mon, 04 May 2009 00:39:39 +0800 分工與輪值等概念呢！經濟學家應該也會感興趣的。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19034957 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 17:55:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19034347 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 15:32:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19034333 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 15:28:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19034155 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 14:53:35 +0800 「膜狀構造有什麼重要性？」的教案做得真是好啊！]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19034023 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 14:24:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19033989 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 14:17:27 +0800 根據通關程序的規定以及我詢問報關行所得的資訊，與倉儲相關的費用包括兩個部分。第一、「延滯費」，依散裝而言，落地當天開始計費，一才是30元。如果是貨櫃，7天後才開始計算。第二、「滯報費」，貨物進艙後15天沒有提領才需繳交，每日徵收18元。一才有多大？很大！依據我的私下調查，零售的N95口罩進貨價在14日是單個150元（一盒160個為單位），你看寄放在倉儲是不是很貴？然而我在後來的回應中已經說明，Jerry所引的計算是海港的倉租，並非我們討論的航空倉租。並且我也提供了一個報關行計算倉租的網頁，讓大家自己算算看。事實上，航空倉租相當貴。因為劉館長和我跑過航空和海港的海關報關，絕非道聽途說可以唬弄。 當時，由於pchome新聞台太過蹩腳，竟然限制留言版1,000則，劉館長只好自行刪除部分留言，因而發生留言佚失後果。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19033853 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 13:45:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19033727 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 13:21:35 +0800 >在 SARS 的情境下，口罩能發揮的可能就不祇是平時口罩的功能而已，而會因為情境的不同而有所改變。 這樣的想法完全是ok的。不過，應該要繼續說下去，SARS期間口號的功能和和平不同，然後呢？如何由此推論到政府應該介入？要達成什麼目的以及是否真能達成目的？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19033709 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 13:17:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19033491 YukieChen@gmail.com(Yukie) 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 12:24:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19033199 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 11:28:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19032895 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 07:54:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19032827 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 06:51:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19032681 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 03:54:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19032613 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 03:22:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19031757 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 00:43:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19031635 文章回應 Sun, 03 May 2009 00:28:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19031103 文章回應 Sat, 02 May 2009 22:34:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19029709 文章回應 Sat, 02 May 2009 21:53:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/8841647.html#comment-19029645 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Sat, 02 May 2009 21:36:07 +0800