http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-19499077 gordan@klnn.net(謝國清) 文章回應 Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:58:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-19225669 monchilio@hotmail.com(lakatos) 文章回應 Wed, 27 May 2009 13:44:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-19222119 文章回應 Wed, 27 May 2009 10:21:03 +0800 如不採計在校成績，有些較熱門的高中職超額怎麼辦？謝國清建議可抽籤及依入籍先後順序來決定]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-19221835 文章回應 Wed, 27 May 2009 09:00:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-18867549 文章回應 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:31:07 +0800 12年國教／今年3歲娃 升高中免試 2009年的台灣，有人在規劃12年後的政策，真令人感佩。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-18867307 文章回應 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:42:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-18745811 文章回應 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:41:02 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-18745499 文章回應 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:50:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-18732539 文章回應 Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:42:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-18731773 文章回應 Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:18:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10714789 文章回應 Thu, 31 May 2007 21:53:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10576245 senyek9527@gmail.com(9527) 文章回應 Tue, 22 May 2007 12:50:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10567643 文章回應 Tue, 22 May 2007 02:49:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10564885 senyek9527@gmail.com(9527) 文章回應 Mon, 21 May 2007 22:45:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10522499 文章回應 Sat, 19 May 2007 19:31:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10470073 文章回應 Thu, 17 May 2007 00:08:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10468843 文章回應 Wed, 16 May 2007 22:27:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10468629 文章回應 Wed, 16 May 2007 21:53:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10459539 文章回應 Wed, 16 May 2007 11:03:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10451299 文章回應 Tue, 15 May 2007 23:34:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10444617 senyek9527@gmail.com(9527) 文章回應 Tue, 15 May 2007 21:44:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10433297 文章回應 Tue, 15 May 2007 14:19:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10432583 文章回應 Tue, 15 May 2007 13:41:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10432135 文章回應 Tue, 15 May 2007 12:48:37 +0800 http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntut019/edu/edu.html 其中第十五頁表四 平均每生支出 - 每生繳的學雜費 = 政府補助 這邊我有點看不懂 為什麼全部算給政府補助呢? 學校其他自籌款或額外收入或校友捐款都不算嗎 這樣是否會高估政府補助款數目呢? 駱教授和吳教授算的是2001年台大學生約被補助25.22萬 因為我查到的資料是這樣 我是用大學卓越計畫的資料 台大在94學年度台大所獲得的教育部獎助金為41.79億餘元 台大學生數我用2萬六千來除 平均每生所得補助約為160730左右 16萬和25.22萬差了9萬 雖然政府每年補助有降低 感覺差四年就差好多 這個地方我看不懂 可以請教一下駱教授嗎? 另外 跟大家分享(野人獻曝)一下 http://www.sinica.edu.tw/info/edu-reform/farea8/j13/02.html 原來1994年就有人提出要開放學費自由化了阿 台灣真是沒進步... 還是說 1994教改那次 林全 蓋浙生老師這一派比較沒有發聲權較被忽視呢 因為我看到後來的文章多半都是引用黃武雄老師的 "政府出錢辦好大學" 這種 謝謝駱老師]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10432123 文章回應 Tue, 15 May 2007 12:46:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10357955 文章回應 Thu, 10 May 2007 21:29:39 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10349033 文章回應 Thu, 10 May 2007 10:52:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10345155 joken0723@yahoo.com.tw(joken) 文章回應 Thu, 10 May 2007 09:32:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10329063 文章回應 Wed, 09 May 2007 12:50:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10323165 文章回應 Wed, 09 May 2007 08:09:36 +0800 >想請問教授，台灣適不適合12年國教？ 這可能要請你先說一下，什麼是「適合」？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10322903 文章回應 Wed, 09 May 2007 06:29:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-10318377 evestacye@hotmail.com(周芷含) 文章回應 Tue, 08 May 2007 23:12:58 +0800 12年國教 排富條款 單獨招生私校 學生不補助 排富？還是逃避競爭？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-9695647 文章回應 Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:22:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084145 文章回應 Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:47:56 +0800 抽籤入學曾經在2003年被研議過，後來大概不了了之了。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084143 文章回應 Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:36:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084141 文章回應 Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:20:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084139 文章回應 Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:42:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084137 文章回應 Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:10:52 +0800 教育部關於十二年國教的說法]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084135 文章回應 Tue, 13 Mar 2007 06:13:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084133 文章回應 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:00:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084131 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:53:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084129 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:25:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084127 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:26:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084125 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:18:53 +0800 聯合國教科文組織：Right to Education, Obligations of States 要點： Thus recognised et accessible to all, the right to education must now be implemented. Like all human rights, the right to education imposes three levels of obligations on States: the obligation to respect, protect and fulfil. The obligation to fulfil incorporates both an obligation to facilitate and an obligation to provide. (2) 丹麥基礎教育介紹 要點： In Denmark, we have compulsory education - not compulsory schooling. Compulsory education starts in the year of a child's 7th birthday and lasts for 9 years. The compulsory education obligation can be fulfilled by letting the child attend the instruction in 1) the municipal Folkeskole, 2) in a private school or 3) through home tuition. (3)立法名詞與概念釐清範例]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084123 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:38:09 +0800 http://www.szp.kz/publications/id_22.htm （順便說明一下：大學教師是要繳稅的，「教師免稅」可跟我們無關：）]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084121 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:13:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084119 文章回應 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:03:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084117 文章回應 Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:47:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084115 文章回應 Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:24:08 +0800 >>>>個人對政府沒有什麼「義務」可言 這句話可否再補充說明一下？ 納稅、服兵役、國民教育不都是憲法規定國民應盡的義務嗎？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084113 文章回應 Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:30:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084111 文章回應 Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:21:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084109 文章回應 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:37:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084107 文章回應 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:35:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084105 文章回應 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:16:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084103 文章回應 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:28:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084101 文章回應 Sun, 04 Mar 2007 11:07:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084099 ckjbar@gmail.com(4) 文章回應 Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:00:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084097 文章回應 Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:21:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084095 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:55:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084093 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:38:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084091 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:30:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084089 chinghsing@gmail.com(wang) 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 12:19:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084087 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:33:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084085 chiang@ascurio.org(江董) 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:27:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084083 文章回應 Sat, 03 Mar 2007 09:50:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084081 文章回應 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:37:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084079 文章回應 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:01:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html http://blog.roodo.com/lakatos/archives/2793687.html#comment-7084077 文章回應 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:58:14 +0800