http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved elezione amministrativa gorizia [URL=http://www.wertino.cn/rodriguez] rodriguez [/URL] rodriguez [URL=http://www.wertino.cn/cazzo-pelosi] cazzo pelosi [/URL] cazzo pelosi ]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-16642455 Huanita7666@yahoo.com(Huanita) 文章回應 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:30:06 +0800 http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232273.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232274.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232275.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232276.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232277.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232278.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232279.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232280.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232281.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232282.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232283.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232284.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232285.html http://dotcom.sitesfree.com/232286.html]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195463 hello1967431077@gmail.com(Soma) 文章回應 Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:47:56 +0800 http://www.cuteweblog.com/realtor/ http://www.cuteweblog.com/london/ http://blogsharing.com/lasvegas/ http://blogsharing.com/london/ http://www.akablogs.com/lasvegas/ http://www.akablogs.com/paris/ http://www.dablogs.com/?u=Airflyer http://www.dablogs.com/?u=newhomes http://flighttoparis.forumup.org http://family.forumup.org]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195461 shoesclubhdfys@gmail.com(Realtors) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:03:58 +0800 http://www.blogstudio.com/flighthotelamsterdam/ http://www.blogstudio.com/autoinsurance/ http://usaainsurance.theblogaddict.com http://cheaphotels.theblogaddict.com http://hiltonhotels.blogome.com http://progressiveinsurance.blogome.com http://blogsplosion.com/motorcycleinsurance/ http://blogsplosion.com/hotelcalifornia/ http://bloguitos.com/myrtle/ http://bloguitos.com/insuranse/ http://bloglin.com/termlife/ http://bloglin.com/travelhotel/ http://bloglin.com/singapure/]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195459 astrologysigns13@yahoo.com(Cheap) 文章回應 Sun, 30 Jul 2006 08:25:44 +0800 http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/diethoodiapill.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/hoodia.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/gordoniihoodia.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/hoodiapure.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/diethoodia.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/hoodialossweight.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/hoodiapatch.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/hoodiapluspure.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/bestdiethoodia.html http://bonus.blox.pl/resource/bestdiethoodiapill.html]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195457 hoodianline.ut@gmail.com(Hoodia) 文章回應 Mon, 26 Jun 2006 17:40:24 +0800 http://site.neogen.ro/accessories/images/img_927367.html , http://site.neogen.ro/accessories/images/img_927370.htm , http://site.neogen.ro/accessories/images/img_927372.htm , http://site.neogen.ro/accessories/images/img_927375.htm , http://site.neogen.ro/accessories/images/img_927377.htm , http://washers.cba.pl/Portable_washer.html]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195455 washers-and-dryers2@hotmail.com(Washers and dryers) 文章回應 Sun, 28 May 2006 14:01:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195453 文章回應 Thu, 04 May 2006 02:58:32 +0800 「但今天的美國與台灣貧窮人是少數, 在經濟發展的過程中, 所得不均度上升沒錯, 但多數人的生活獲得改善, 我們實在沒有必要過度強調所得不均等的現象, 這真的是 nonissue.」 這樣的論斷是根據什麼數據？可以毫不遲疑得出「今天的美國與台灣貧窮人是少數」和「 但多數人的生活獲得改善」這類結論？ 我並非故意找碴，但這種論斷與我在基層一面工作一面觀察一面交談得到的「經驗」是差異很大的，雖然我承認我不應該放大自己有限的基層經驗來談，但還是不得不質疑glenngould 又是根據什麼來論斷？ 還有，我真的很好奇：「台灣貧窮人是少數」的「少數」跟「 多數人的生活獲得改善」的「多數」又是以什麼為標準？不知道窮人必須佔台灣人口百分之幾才是嚴重的「非少數」？ 我真的越來越道德體操化了……]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195451 文章回應 Thu, 04 May 2006 02:17:35 +0800 「但今天的美國與台灣貧窮人是少數, 在經濟發展的過程中, 所得不均度上升沒錯, 但多數人的生活獲得改善, 我們實在沒有必要過度強調所得不均等的現象, 這真的是 nonissue.」 這樣的論斷是根據什麼數據？可以毫不遲疑得出「今天的美國與台灣貧窮人是少數」和「 但多數人的生活獲得改善」這類結論？ 我並非故意找碴，但這種論斷與我在基層一面工作一面觀察一面交談得到的「經驗」是差異很大的，雖然我承認我不應該放大自己有限的基層經驗來談，但還是不得不質疑glenngould 又是根據什麼來論斷？ 還有，我真的很好奇：「台灣貧窮人是少數」的「少數」跟「 多數人的生活獲得改善」的「多數」又是以什麼為標準？不知道窮人必須佔台灣人口百分之幾才是嚴重的「非少數」？ 我真的越來越道德體操化了……]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195449 文章回應 Thu, 04 May 2006 02:13:05 +0800 Rising income inequality in Taiwan should be a nonissue，glenngould]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195447 文章回應 Thu, 04 May 2006 00:46:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195445 文章回應 Tue, 02 May 2006 19:05:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195443 文章回應 Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:18:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195441 文章回應 Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:54:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195439 文章回應 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:06:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195437 文章回應 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:15:21 +0800 http://www.unige.ch/ses/ecopo/demelo/Developpement/DeinigerSquire_98.pdf Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality, World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), September, 565-91. Barro, Robert J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), March, 87-120.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195435 文章回應 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:34:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195433 文章回應 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:12:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195431 文章回應 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:03:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195429 文章回應 Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:11:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195427 文章回應 Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:28:01 +0800 Is the Increased Earnings Inequality among Americans Bad? Richard Posner Why Rising Income Inequality in the United States Should Be a Nonissue 提供各位參考!]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195425 文章回應 Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:14:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195423 文章回應 Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:22:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195421 文章回應 Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:12:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195419 文章回應 Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:05:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195417 文章回應 Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:39:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195415 文章回應 Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:54:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195413 文章回應 Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:54:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195411 文章回應 Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:25:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195409 文章回應 Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:41:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195407 文章回應 Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:43:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195405 文章回應 Sun, 23 Apr 2006 04:33:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195403 文章回應 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:50:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195401 文章回應 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:07:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195399 文章回應 Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:50:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195397 文章回應 Sun, 16 Apr 2006 22:57:18 +0800 http://www.sidos.ch/publications/e_mb_dj_comparing.pdf]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195395 文章回應 Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:10:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195393 文章回應 Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:01:36 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195391 文章回應 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:58:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195389 文章回應 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:25:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195387 文章回應 Tue, 11 Apr 2006 03:59:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195385 文章回應 Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:27:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195383 文章回應 Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:00:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195381 文章回應 Tue, 04 Apr 2006 23:26:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195379 文章回應 Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:28:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195377 chiiang19712000@yahoo.com.tw(chaiing(影子）) 文章回應 Sun, 02 Apr 2006 12:18:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195375 文章回應 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:55:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195373 文章回應 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:47:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195371 文章回應 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:41:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195369 文章回應 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:40:48 +0800 iron那裡的討論 突然想起嗜書人以前說過的 對整個世界脫離貧窮最有貢獻的兩個國家 是中國和越南 若加計第三世界 全球的中產階級到底是擴大還是縮小呢？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195367 文章回應 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:40:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195365 文章回應 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:21:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195363 文章回應 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:00:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195361 文章回應 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:51:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195359 文章回應 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:07:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195357 文章回應 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:25:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195355 文章回應 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:30:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195353 文章回應 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:05:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195351 文章回應 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:21:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195349 文章回應 Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:30:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195347 文章回應 Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:53:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195345 文章回應 Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:06:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195343 文章回應 Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:12:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195341 文章回應 Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:23:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195339 文章回應 Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:41:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195337 文章回應 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:17:54 +0800 紅不紅左不左，不如好好面對問題的本質，思考如何改善更多人的生活。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195335 文章回應 Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:04:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195333 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:15:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195331 補充練習(Ben) 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:06:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195329 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:18:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195327 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:41:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195325 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:50:25 +0800 http://ess.nsd.uib.no/files/2003/ESS1SocialClassReport.pdf]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195323 zoo42@hotmail.com(戀戀風塵) 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 01:21:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195321 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:47:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195319 文章回應 Sat, 25 Mar 2006 00:10:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195317 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:47:46 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195315 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:31:18 +0800 middle class 的解釋，至今還沒有一個明確的定義，如果用 $$$ 衡量的話，只有以下這段話 A net worth, what a person's total material assets are worth, minus their debt. Most economists define "middle-class" citizens as those with net worths of between $25,000 (low middle class) to $250,000. Those with net worths between $250,000 and $500,000 typically are categorized as upper middle class 這問題用數字想很簡單，天下那個例子他想買夫妻年薪總合 10 倍的房子，各位以自己為例算算看你敢嗎？如果答案是 "敢" 那就有資格說這是 "中產階級的困境"，如果自己的答案是 "不敢" 那這篇文章和大一女生抱怨買不起 LV 包包有何差別？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195313 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:15:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195311 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:04:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195309 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:48:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195307 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:25:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195305 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:19:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195303 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:23:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195301 文章回應 Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:54:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195299 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:31:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195297 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:19:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195295 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:16:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195293 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:11:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195291 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:51:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195289 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:12:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195287 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:04:52 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195285 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:46:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195283 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:29:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195281 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:57:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195279 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:43:43 +0800 五鬼搬運法 是否這五年來全球的低利率環境，使得全球的資本家有最好的環境玩五鬼搬運法 ? 前幾天一個 anti-Bush 的老美在我公司如此說]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195277 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:13:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195275 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:38:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195273 文章回應 Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:30:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195271 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:45:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195269 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:40:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195267 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:33:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195265 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:19:04 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195263 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:16:10 +0800 異鄉人那裡的討論串見習一下的.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195261 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:07:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195259 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:57:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195257 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:45:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195255 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:17:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195253 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:40:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195251 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:55:44 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195249 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:55:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195247 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:23:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195245 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:57:27 +0800 http://money.guardian.co.uk/news_/story/0,,1729173,00.html http://blog.roodo.com/glenngould/archives/1261925.html]]> http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195243 文章回應 Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:22:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html http://blog.roodo.com/laches/archives/1293160.html#comment-8195241 文章回應 Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:35:32 +0800