<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>消費卷結果揭曉</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/karamazov/archives/8669719.html/</link>
<description><![CDATA[去年我提過,消費卷成功與否必需看到底民眾是替代掉原有的消費還是創造出額外的消費.兩小報以及各電視台也拼命吹捧消費卷&quot;神奇的效果&quot;.經建會主委也威風凜凜地立下軍令狀]]>
	</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/karamazov/archives/8669719-comment.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>回應：消費卷結果揭曉</title>
	<description><![CDATA[可參考這篇：

白忙一場消費券
<a href='http://blog.yam.com/jason0608/article/20900521' rel='nofollow'><a href='http://blog.yam.com/jason0608/article/20900521' rel='nofollow'>http://blog.yam.com/jason0608/article/20900521</a></a>]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/karamazov/archives/8669719.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/karamazov/archives/8669719.html#comment-19242125</guid>
		<category>文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:36:16 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：消費卷結果揭曉</title>
	<description><![CDATA[因為她們不想下台 所以繼續凹
反正有藍媒繼續幫她們化妝]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/karamazov/archives/8669719.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/karamazov/archives/8669719.html#comment-18969175</guid>
		<category>文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:19:26 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>