http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783853 文章回應 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:12:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783851 文章回應 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:07:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783849 文章回應 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:57:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783847 文章回應 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:34:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783845 文章回應 Sun, 15 Oct 2006 03:27:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783843 文章回應 Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:58:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783841 文章回應 Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:55:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783839 文章回應 Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:54:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/jussara/archives/1696611.html 「民進黨某程度是褻瀆了綠色。當他們選擇這個顏色時，是有濃厚鄉土意識與環保意識的，可是現在全變了樣。我想真正愛綠色的人們不會因為民進黨的墮落而唱衰台灣，綠色家園之夢也不會就此失色。」]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783837 文章回應 Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:48:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/wakako/archives/1867512.html]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783835 文章回應 Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:41:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783833 文章回應 Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:33:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783831 文章回應 Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:25:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783829 文章回應 Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:12:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783827 文章回應 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:24:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783825 文章回應 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:26:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783823 文章回應 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:37:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783821 文章回應 Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:11:07 +0800 > 這個聲明尚未提出就被媒體大肆炒作，背後的操作當然值得質疑。這筆帳是要算的。 怎麼算？跟誰算？有把握不是被設計了？]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783819 文章回應 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:39:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783817 文章回應 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:49:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783815 文章回應 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:42:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783813 文章回應 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:00:13 +0800 繼續在台灣住下去的理由。 真是奇異的深夜網路遊記。 不過，還是沒找到曾經寫過的我對綠的看法。 有空再找囉。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783811 文章回應 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 03:33:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783809 文章回應 Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:06:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783807 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:11:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783805 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:14:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783803 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:59:13 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783801 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:19:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783799 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:29:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/SoundsandFury/archives/1881704.html#comments]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783797 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:33:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783795 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 14:02:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783793 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:42:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783791 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 06:34:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783789 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 03:22:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783787 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 02:55:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783785 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 02:43:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783783 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 02:28:21 +0800 對我寫的東西有疑問請光明正大的來我的BLOG討論，這樣我們才有對話的機會，被人通知才知道有人在背後用這麼嚴厲的言語、如此貧乏的論述批判，換做是你作何感想？ 1.我本來就會在我的部落格發出相關議題和引用，只是樂多一直當機還沒發文，除非你沒有引用功能，誰說我有意見一定要到貴寶地？還是任何人在別處的「留言」對不在場的某人批判，都一定要鉅細靡遺向那個人報告嗎？ 2.酥餅，請你仔細檢視一下你妙子、蕭艸梅與wakako的文章回應，任何不同意見的下場不就是遭到非理性的圍剿嗎？閣下又維持了什麼？我只看到你們幾位大聲附和那些非理性發言卻立場一致的同伴。 所以，「引用」是應該的，但去你那裡口水戰，我沒有耐性。 對不起，這只是我個人的憤怒，不希望給樹窠帶來麻煩。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783781 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:26:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783779 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:04:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783777 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:41:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783775 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:06:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783773 文章回應 Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:01:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783771 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:55:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783769 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:27:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783767 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:17:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783765 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:47:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783763 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:33:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783761 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:16:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783759 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:34:54 +0800 陳增芝給吳乃德的公開信我從好幾個人那裡收到轉傳，我想她的看法有一定的代表性。 另一篇北社副秘書長王美琇的文章，平實說明了綠營支持者的憂心與不平。 3.聯合報昨天頭版過度操作，把林義雄和澄社都拉進來為此聲明背書，已遭范雲和澄社否認，今天聯合報不但未加以澄清，還在相關新聞中夾帶「郭宏治坦承找過林義雄」，但完全不提林義雄到底如何回應。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783757 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:04:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783755 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:59:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783753 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:08:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783751 mana66@gmail.com(xuli) 文章回應 Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:27:13 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783749 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:47:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783747 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:41:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783745 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:10:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783743 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:17:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783741 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:15:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783739 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:14:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783737 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:11:16 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783735 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:33:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783733 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:24:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783731 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:03:44 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/subing/archives/1883396.html#comments 基本上我對這份聲明的內容與提出的時機，還有媒體的大肆吹捧，都覺得有問題。老王和店小二講得很清楚不再贅述。以目前台灣媒體的生態，冀望這份聲明的出現就能產生民間中道力量的集結，大概很不容易吧！]]> http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783729 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:08:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783727 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:00:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783725 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 15:30:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783723 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:29:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783721 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:41:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783719 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:08:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html http://blog.roodo.com/judie35/archives/1885414.html#comment-4783717 mana66@gmail.com(xuli) 文章回應 Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:53:02 +0800