Hugo Liberalitas

每一個人都是造物主的傑作，每一個人的存在都是造物主的恩賜，每一個人都具有God的形像（Natural Image of God），每一個人都被造物主自然賦予了良心與善心，這個良心與善心具有自然認同愛與正義的本質，這個良心與善心來自於造物主的那口氣，那就是Holy Spirit。

但是，人也有罪性(Original Sin) ，這個罪性會掩蓋人的良心與善心，使人的良心與善心受到罪性的綑綁與控制，因此導致了人心的腐敗與道德的墮落；即使如此，人的良心與善心還是存在的，只是它被罪性所監禁著，因此它無法正常地展現出愛與遵循正義的行為。

《聖經》提供了主耶穌基督的愛與《十誡》的道德理念，它可以成為人類通往光明大道的藍圖，它可以成為人類分辨絕對道德的座標，它可以提醒人避免墮入黑暗與邪惡的陷阱，它可以幫助罪人獲得生命的救贖與重生，它可以幫助人有更清晰的道德鑑別能力，它可以幫助人建立明確的道德原則與立場。

我曾經是一個多方面相當自豪的人，但是，自從2004年11月15日我看了《耶穌受難記》(The Passion of the Christ)後，我才開始認識主耶穌基督，我才真正清楚地知道，我只不過是一團塵埃糞土，我只不過是一個大漢沙文主義的病毒，我只不過是一個受制於漢文化價值觀Matrix的奴僕，我只不過是一個充滿罪惡與世俗性的人，我什麼都不是，我只是一個無知的蠢豬。

從我開始認識主耶穌基督的那一刻起，我原本的驕傲被信仰所粉碎了，我才意識到過去我所理解的成就與生命歷程，根本就是微不足道，根本只是行走在黑暗之中；我才意識到過去的我，就像是一片漂浮在空中沒有重量的羽毛，並沒有真正的根。

是《聖經》裡的理念，是主耶穌基督的話，是主耶穌基督的光，讓我的生命重生，讓我開始走生命的第一步，讓我接觸到Spiritual Life and Value，讓我的生命開始走進光，沒有《聖經》與主耶穌基督的光，這一切如何可能？

《聖經》盲，必然是道德與生命意義的文盲，這是我這幾年所獲得的寶貴經驗；我可以非常地確定，我會繼續用心地禱告與讀《聖經》，我會繼續努力地走主耶穌基督的道，我會繼續努力地宣揚主耶穌基督的愛，我會繼續努力地作為主耶穌基督最卑微的器皿，直到永遠！

2009-7-17（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

胡祈說，“歐美西方的心靈自由也是相對而限制的啊？嚴格地來說，歐美西方人的絕大多數還屬於單一上帝的奴僕，歐美西方國家真正走向心靈自由化的比例不大吧？這也就是西方文明社會的最大瓶頸：上帝的奴僕？

胡祈又說，“華人可能是地球人類歷史現實生活裏的最佳奴才，華人都幾乎成爲家天下專制奴才，而且還是老子自然道樸素唯物一元論的奴才，也是孔子倒退復古儒家仁義倫理的奴才，更是馬克思列寧封建共産社會主義的奴才，當然也有相當一部分華人成了西方基督文明的洋奴，甚至一部分華人精英成了西方科技金融黑箱作業的奴才，縱觀中國五千年歷史，華人幾乎全部屬於奴才啊？”

我想問胡祈，“你覺得當主耶穌基督的奴僕比較好，還是當世俗性價值觀的奴僕(專制文化的奴僕、血緣意識的奴僕、種族主義的奴僕、錢財的奴僕、名利權位的奴僕)比較好？你選擇遵從於Sacred Values的前者 ，還是順服於Secular Values的後者？”

我想問胡祈，“你覺得不先當主耶穌基督的奴僕，人類有可能走進“Spiritual Liberalization, Cultural Liberalization, Economic Liberalization, Political Liberalization, Educational Liberalization”與 “Sacred Values, Spiritual Values, Spiritual Heart, Spiritual Soul, Spiritual Mind, Spiritual Ideas, Spiritual Thoughts” 等文明嗎？”

我想問胡祈，“你覺得不先當主耶穌基督的奴僕，美國人有可能創造出他們的《五月花號公約》、《維吉尼亞權利法案》、《維吉尼亞憲法》、《獨立宣言》、《邦聯條例》、《憲法》與《權利法案》嗎？”

我想問胡祈，“你覺得不先當主耶穌基督的奴僕，東亞大陸人有可能真正走出他們的‘黑暗、邪惡、道德混亂、種族主義、血緣意識、等級意識、家長意識、權威意識、崇古意識、迫害、仇恨、虛無、鬥爭、害人、專制與奴隸’等文明嗎？”

你知道哪些人自認為是“主耶穌基督的奴僕”嗎？

她與他就是林昭、戴明神父(Father Damien de Veusteur)、特蕾莎修女（Mother Teresa of Calcutta) 、莫札特(Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart)、貝多芬（Beethovenhaus）、喬爾丹諾•布魯諾（Giordano Bruno）、巴哈(Johann Sebastian Bach)、柴可夫斯基(Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky)、牛頓(Isaac Newton）、奥古斯丁（Aurelius Augustine）、湯瑪斯•阿奎納（Thomas Aquinas）、馬里旦（Jacques Maritain)、斯賓諾莎（Benedictus Spinoza）、培根（Lord Francis Bacon）、萊布尼茲（Gottfriend Wilhelm Leibniz）、洛克（John Locke）、哥德（Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe）、威廉•莎士比亞（William Shakespeare）、但丁(Dante Alighieri)、賽萬提斯(Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra)、約翰 密爾頓(John Milton)、馬丁•路德•金(Martin Luther King, Jr.)、伽利略(Galiler Galileo)、哥伯尼(Nicolas Copernicus)、愛迪生（Thomas Alva Edison）、威廉•康拉德•倫琴（Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen）、安培(Ampere,Andre-Marie)、歐姆(Georg Simon Ohm)、庫侖(Coulomb，Charles-Augustin de)、法拉第 (Michael Faraday)、馬可尼 (Marconi, G.W.)、約瑟比利士、莫爾斯、居里夫人(Maria Skłodowska-Curie)、琴納 (Edward Jenner)、巴斯德(Pasteur,Louis)、開普勒(Weil der Stadt)、孟得爾(Gregor Mendel)、莫理遜 (A. Cressy Morrison)、范伯朗博士 (Dr. Wernher Von Braun)、普朗克（Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck)、勒虛博士（Benjamkin Rush）、高生（Louis Goussen）、林白(Charles A. Lindbergh)、特那 (Dwight Dana)、赫富密勒（Hugh Miller）、克爾凱郭爾(Soren Aabye Kierkegaard)、杜斯妥也夫斯基、司各脫（Sir Walter Scott）、華盛頓(George Washington)、喬治．梅遜(George Mason)、亞當斯（John Adams）、帕特里克•亨利(Patrick Henry)、梭羅(Henry David Thoreau)、亞當斯(Samuel Adams)、麥迪遜(James Madison)、富蘭克林（Benjamin Franklin）、亨利•杜南（Jean Henri Dunant, 紅十字會創立人）、弗羅倫斯•南丁格爾（Florence Nightingale）、威伯福斯（William Wilberforce, 英格蘭廢除奴隸運動倡導者）、梭羅 (Henry David Thoreau) 、愛默生（Ralph Waldo Emerson）、林肯（Abraham Lincoin）、雷根（Ronald Wilson Reagan）、柴契爾夫人(Margaret Hilda Thatcher)、亞當斯密(Adam Smith)、卜威廉(William Booth，救世軍創立者)、密爾頓•弗里德曼（Milton Friedman）、沙勿略（San Francisco Javier)、利瑪竇（Matteo Ricci）、南懷義（Fr. Theophile Verbist）、馬禮遜（Robert Morrison）、米憐（William Milne）、戴德生（James Hudson Taylor）、李愛銳(Eric Liddell)、李提摩太（Timothy Richard）、林樂知（Young John Allen)、古約翰（Jonathan Goforth）、賓惠廉（William Chalmers Burns）、寇爾森(Chuck Colson)等人！

你覺得他們的“Spirit of Liberty, Spiritual Values, Spiritual Heart, Spiritual Soul, Spiritual Mind, Spiritual Ideas, Spiritual Thoughts”會比那些“世俗性價值觀的奴僕”低下嗎？你覺得他們的“Spirit of Liberty, Spiritual Values, Spiritual Heart, Spiritual Soul, Spiritual Mind, Spiritual Ideas, Spiritual Thoughts”還不足嗎？

《聖經》說，“as it is written: None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God. All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.”(Romans 3:10-12)與“And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. Though they know God’s decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.”

因此，若人類心中沒有主耶穌基督的愛與《十誡》的道德理念，那麼人類所說的“Spirit of Liberty”將成為“放縱、混亂、混沌、胡來、道德混亂、唯我獨尊、任意犯罪、一盤散沙、楊朱主義”與“Anti-liberty, Anti-justice, Anti-moral, Anti-science, Anti-logic, Anti-reason”等的代名詞。

《聖經》說，“Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.”(2 Corinthians 3:17)、 “For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace.”(Romans 6:14) 與“And so, from the day we heard, we have not ceased to pray for you, asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, so as to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing to him, bearing fruit in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God. May you be strengthened with all power, according to his glorious might, for all endurance and patience with joy, giving thanks to the Father, who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saints in light.”(Colossians 1:9-12)

因此，若人類心中有主耶穌基督的愛與《十誡》的道德理念，那麼人類所說的“Spirit of Liberty”將成為充分體現“God is Love”、 “Love is God”、“God's steadfast love and righteousness”、“The Gospel of Love (Love your neighbor as yourself, Love your enemy as yourself, Love each other as Jesus has loved you)”、 “Individual dignity, Individual independence, Individual self-control, Individual self-government, Individual freedom, Individual equality, Individual human rights, Self-joy, Self-happiness”等價值的代名詞。

我建議你能閱讀“D. James Kennedy & Jerry Newcombe”合著的《What If Jesus Had Never Been Born?》與《What If The Bible Had Never Been Written?》兩本書，並且以這兩本書作為你閱讀《聖經》的前期基礎書。

如果你不閱深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地擺脫“漢文化、漢文字與漢語言”等病毒意識，對你所構建的“價值體系與意識形態的Matrix”？你如何能自我“Spiritual reform and Spiritual revolution”？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解美國人如何透過信仰主耶穌基督所產生的力量，逐漸走向“Spiritual Liberalization, Cultural Liberalization, Economic Liberalization, Political Liberalization, Educational Liberalization”與 “Sacred Values, Spiritual Values, Spiritual Heart, Spiritual Soul, Spiritual Mind, Spiritual Ideas, Spiritual Thoughts”等價值理念的文化？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解美國人“Absolute moral, Absolute truth, Absolute beauty, Absolute good, Absolute justice, Individualism, Liberalism, Love(Love your neighbor as yourself, Love your enemy as yourself), Justice, Spirit of Liberty, Freeman, Self-dignity, Self-control, Self-government, Self-responsibility, Self-protection, Self-defense, Self-directed morals, Self-enforced orientation”等價值理念的根源與基礎？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解美國“《五月花號公約》(The Mayflower Compact, November11, 1620)、《維吉尼亞權利法案》 (The Virginia Declaration of Rights, June 12, 1776)、《維吉尼亞憲法》(The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia, June29, 1776)、《獨立宣言》(The United States Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776) 、《常識》(Common Sense by Thomas Paine. Published in 1776，這是完全屬於基督文明孕育下的道德理念作品)、《邦聯條例》(Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, Nov.15,1777 )、《憲法》(The Constitution of the United States of America, September 17, 1787)與《權利法案》(The United States Bill of Rights, completed September 1787, approved 1789) ”等文獻的理念根源與基礎？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解林肯（Abraham Lincoln）在Gettysburg Address裡所說的，“that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”，它的價值理念根源與基礎是什麼？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解《The United States Declaration of Independence》( JULY 4, 1776)裡所說的，“ All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”，它的價值理念根源與基礎是什麼？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解‘Truth will set you free” (John 8:32)與‘The truth will free you from sin (John 8:34) and death (John 8:51) ”？你如何能真正與全面地認知“Spirit of Freedom”與“Being a free man”的精神根源與基礎是什麼？

如果你不深入地閱讀《聖經》與信仰主耶穌基督的話，那麼你如何能真正與全面地理解美國人在唸“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” 時，他們是依據什麼的力量與信念？

主耶穌基督說，“Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind”(Matthew 22:37)、“Love your neighbor as yourself”(Matthew 22.40) 、“Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who treat you badly”( Luke 6:27-28)、“Love one another; just as I have loved you, you also must love one another. By this love you have for one another, everyone will know that you are my disciples.”(John 13.34-35)，這些才是真正的光，這些才是真正可以消滅人類“種族沙文主義、種族中心主義、種族大一統主義、血緣意識、等級意識、家長意識、權威意識、迫害意識、仇恨意識、相對道德意識、虛無意識、鬥爭意識與害人意識”等文化的光，不是嗎？

主耶穌基督說， “You know the commandments: Never commit adultery. Never murder. Never steal. Never give false testimony. Honor your father and mother”(Luke 18:20)、“Anybody who receives my commandments and keeps them will be one who loves me”(John 14.21)、 “ I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”(John 8:12)、“Jesus answered, I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”(John14:6)，這些才是真正的光，這些才是真正可以消滅人類“黑暗、邪惡、罪惡、道德混亂、專制與奴隸”等文化的光，不是嗎？

2009-7-14（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

在東亞大陸共產黨政權大崩潰的前夕，東亞大陸各地區推動獨立建國運動者，有必要參閱《維吉尼亞權利法案》與《維吉尼亞憲法》，否則東亞大陸各地區，未來如何能順利地建立各自的獨立國(Independent State)憲法？

1776年6月12日，維吉尼亞議會(The Virginia Assembly)，通過了由George Mason草擬的《維吉尼亞權利法案》(The Virginia Bill of Rights)；《維吉尼亞權利法案》是美國的第一部權利法案 (The Virginia Declaration of Rights has been called the first American bill of rights.)，它提出了“All men are by nature equally free and independent”、“That all power is derived from the people”、“Magistrates are people's trustees and servants”與“Whenever any government shall be found inadequate, a majority of the community hath an right to reform, alter or abolish it”等重要的理念。

《維吉尼亞權利法案》裡的理念(The importance of the Virginia Declaration of Rights is that it was the first constitutional protection of individual rights, rather than protecting just members of Parliament or consisting of simple laws that can be changed as easily as passed.)，影響了後來的“The United States Declaration of Independence”(July 4, 1776)、“The United States Bill of Rights”(completed September 1787, approved 1789)、“The French Revolution's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen”(1789)等重要文件。

例如，“The United States Declaration of Independence”提到了“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

例如，“The French Revolution's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen”提到了“Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions can be founded only on the common utility.”

《維吉尼亞憲法》(《The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia》, The original Virginia Constitution of 1776 was enacted in conjunction with the Declaration of Independence by the first thirteen states of the United States of America.),最早是由“George Mason, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison”等草擬，並且於1776年6月29日通過的；此憲法的第一部分，含有《維吉尼亞權利法案》的主要文字。

這部《維吉尼亞憲法》是美國各殖民地國的先驅與範本(Virginia was the first state to adopt its own constitution, and the document was widely influential both in the United States and abroad.)，美國各State的憲法，都在1776至1789年間制定。

《維吉尼亞權利法案》的內容如下：

A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS made by the representatives of the good people of Virginia, assembled in full and free convention which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

Section 1. That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

Section 2. That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.

Section 3. That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.

Section 4. That no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which, not being descendible, neither ought the offices of magistrate, legislator, or judge be hereditary.

Section 5. That the legislative and executive powers of the state should be separate and distinct from the judicative; and, that the members of the two first may be restrained from oppression by feeling and participating the burthens of the people, they should, at fixed periods, be reduced to a private station, return into that body from which they were originally taken, and the vacancies be supplied by frequent, certain, and regular elections in which all, or any part of the former members, to be again eligible, or ineligible, as the laws shall direct.

Section 6. That elections of members to serve as representatives of the people in assembly ought to be free; and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community have the right of suffrage and cannot be taxed or deprived of their property for public uses without their own consent or that of their representatives so elected, nor bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assented, for the public good.

Section 7. That all power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by any authority without consent of the representatives of the people is injurious to their rights and ought not to be exercised.

Section 8. That in all capital or criminal prosecutions a man hath a right to demand the cause and nature of his accusation to be confronted with the accusers and witnesses, to call for evidence in his favor, and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury of his vicinage, without whose unanimous consent he cannot be found guilty, nor can he be compelled to give evidence against himself; that no man be deprived of his liberty except by the law of the land or the judgement of his peers.
Section 9. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed; nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Section 10. That general warrants, whereby any officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive and ought not to be granted.

Section 11. That in controversies respecting property and in suits between man and man, the ancient trial by jury is preferable to any other and ought to be held sacred.
Section 12. That the freedom of the press is one of the greatest bulwarks of liberty and can never be restrained but by despotic governments.

Section 13. That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and be governed by, the civil power.

Section 14. That the people have a right to uniform government; and therefore, that no government separate from, or independent of, the government of Virginia, ought to be erected or established within the limits thereof.

Section 15. That no free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.

Section 16. That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the manner of discharging it, can be directed by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.

Adopted unanimously June 12, 1776 Virginia Convention of Delegates drafted by Mr. George Mason

2009-7-10（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

1863年11月19日，亞伯拉罕•林肯（Abraham Lincoln，1809年2月12日－1865年4月15日）在Gettysburg National Cemetery，發表了著名的Gettysburg Address。

他在此演講裡說，“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that this nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

林肯在Gettysburg Address裡的核心理念，就是“that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”，沒有主耶穌基督之光，如何可能？

146年後的今天，東亞大陸還存在著13億的奴隸，林肯Gettysburg Address裡的理念，依然是這13億奴隸所奮鬥的目標，依然是這13億奴隸所努力的目標，依然是這13億奴隸所追求的目標！

1947年2月至5月的臺灣228事件、1962年5月中旬的伊塔屠殺事件(導致1962年伊寧5•29大逃亡事件)、1968 年的內人黨2•4屠殺事件(Southern Mongolian People)、1989年的Tibet 3•5屠殺事件、1990年的巴壬4•5屠殺事件(Uighurs)、1997年的伊犁2•5屠殺事件、2008年的拉薩3•14屠殺事件、2008年的貴州甕安6•28群體性事件、2008年的雲南孟連7•19群體事件、2008年的湖南吉首9•24群體性事件(2008年的吉首9•3與9•4群體性上訪堵路事件)、2009年的湖北石首6•19事件(2009年6月19日上午至6月20日淩晨)、2009年的山東東明6•18群體抗議化工汙染事件、2009年的江西南康6•15事件、2009年的Uighurs7•5屠殺事件等，這都是東亞大陸13億奴隸流血抗爭的歷史！

不論壓迫者的暴力與武力有多強大，人類的歷史早已證明了一個事實，這些只有少數人的壓迫者，終將被那些佔多數人的被壓迫者所推翻，因此共產黨專制政權滅亡的日子已不久了！

主耶穌基督說，“Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind”(Matthew 22:37)、“Love your neighbor as yourself”(Matthew 22.40) 、“Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who treat you badly”(Luke 6.27-28)、“Love one another; just as I have loved you, you also must love one another. By this love you have for one another, everyone will know that you are my disciples”(John13.34-35)、“You know the commandments: you must not kill... ”(Mark 10.18) 、“You know the commandments: Never commit adultery. Never murder. Never steal. Never give false testimony. Honor your father and mother”(Luke 18:20)、“Anybody who receives my commandments and keeps them will be one who loves me”(John 14.21)、“Jesus answered, I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”(John14:6)，這些都是光，這些都是消滅黑暗、邪惡、專制與奴隸等文化的光！

我堅信，在主耶穌基督之光裡，所有壓迫者必然會滅亡，而“Individualism, Liberalism, Love, Righteousness, Justice, Humanity、Life, Faith, Truth, Freedom, Democracy, Equality, Rule of law、Human rights、Happiness、Peace”等價值理念，終將成為未來人類文明的主體！

2009-7-10（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

在“大漢沙文主義”、“大漢大一統主義”與“大漢帝國主義”的意識下，那些被“漢文化、漢文字、漢語言”洗過腦的人，那些接受漢化的人，那些自認為是漢人的人，他們經常會使用“中國”、“中國人”、“中國文化”、“中國歷史”、“中華”、 “中華文化”、“中華民族”、“炎黃子孫”、“龍的傳人”、“華人”、“漢人”、“唐人”與“少數民族”等的“偽概念”。

他們不知道這些“偽概念”，不僅是邪惡的，而且是不真實的；這些“偽概念”，是阻礙他或她接受“Individualism, Liberalism, Freeman, Individual person, Independent person, ,Individual freedom, Self-dignity, Self-control, Self-government, Self-responsibility, Self-protection, Self-defense, Self-happiness, Self-directed morals, Self-enforced orientation”等道德理念的絆腳石。

他們不知道這些“偽概念”，不僅是代表種族集體主義的，而且是完全反道德與反正義的；這些“偽概念”，是阻礙他或她接受“You should fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”、“You should be a free man anytime, anywhere.”與“People have the Right to Self-Determination”等道德責任的絕緣體。

這些“偽概念”，是大漢沙文主義者推動“漢種族擴大統治”、“漢種族擴張領土”、“漢種族化”、“種族與文化大清洗”、“漢種族掠奪異族資源”與“漢種對異族的三光政策”(對所有資源採取吃光、搶光、分光；對異族的種族採取名譽上搞臭、經濟上截斷、肉體上消滅)等活動的意識基礎；當你使用了這些“偽概念”時，你或妳就已經成為“大漢沙文主義”、“大漢大一統主義”與“大漢帝國主義”的共犯分子，你或妳就已經在犯罪了，你或妳就應該下地獄了，你或妳真的不知道嗎？

2009-7-9（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

有人說，美國是一個由流亡者所建立的國。這說法是錯誤的，因為這等於是以“希望搏取他人同情的流亡者”概念，來逃避面對“You should fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”、“You should be a free man anytime, anywhere.”與“People have the Right to Self-Determination”等道德理念，因為這等於是以“可恥的流亡者”概念，來直接否定“You should fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”、“You should be a free man anytime, anywhere.”與“People have the Right to Self-Determination”等道德責任。

所謂的“流亡者”就是“集體主義意識下的道德逃亡者”概念，就是“集體主義意識下的道德缺席者”概念，就是那些不敢當“高智晟、胡佳、陳文成、楊佳、林昭、吳樾、徐錫麟、秋瑾、溫生才、林冠慈、陳敬嶽、鐘明光、林覺民、喻培倫、 史堅如 、彭家珍、馬福益、熊成基、 禹之模、佘英、劉慎終、宋玉琳、陳可君、李文甫、陸皓東、唐才常、譚嗣同”等的人。

“A Freeman, Individual person, Independent person”是不可能認同“流亡者”概念，“A Freeman, Individual person, Independent person”是不可能自稱是“流亡者”，例如，Ayn Rand (February 2, 1905 – March 6, 1982),；由流亡者所建立的國，經常是新的專制國或奴國！

當土地的主人不敢站起來抵抗專制與暴政，不敢站起來獨立建國，而必續靠流亡者(逃離專制與暴政的人，不是屬於曼德拉式的地下武裝革命者，也不是屬於美國獨立時的武裝戰鬥者)來建國時，這說明了這些土地的主人只是奴民(Nonfreeman)，由流亡者與奴民所建立的國，經常是新的專制國或奴國。

1620年，那些從英格蘭的普利茅斯搭乘五月花號（Mayflower）客船前往美洲新大陸的清教徒，他們是追求“Freedom”的人，他們不是流亡者，他們不是以流亡者自居，他們不打算回流所謂的祖國，因為他們以新大陸為家，他們要在新大陸建立“自治的政治團體”。

他們在《The Mayflower Compact》提到，“In the name of God, Amen. We whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God of Great Britain, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, etc. Having undertaken, for the Glory of God and advancement of the Christian Faith and Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the First Colony in the Northern Parts of Virginia, do by these presents solemnly and mutually in the presence of God and one of another, Covenant and Combine ourselves together into a Civil Body Politic, for our better ordering and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute and frame such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions and Offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the Colony, unto which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness whereof we have hereunder subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France and Ireland the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth. Anno Domini 1620.”

上述這些人並沒有建立國，也對建立國沒啥興趣，他們的目的是要實現 “A Civil Body Politic under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all”與“All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”的理念，他們同“索忍尼辛(Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn)、孫文、周恩來、鄧小平、許多東亞大陸民運人士與六四逃走者”等自認為是流亡者是不同的，這怎麼可能是屬於同一類的人呢？

上述這些人是要將所遷居住的美洲新大陸變成“Free Land”，他們是信仰主耶穌基督的人，他們是具有“Individualism, Liberalism, Freeman, Individual person, Independent person, ,Individual freedom, Self-dignity, Self-control, Self-government, Self-responsibility, Self-protection, Self-defense, Self-happiness, Self-directed morals, Self-enforced orientation, Self-Determination of People, Limited Government, The rule of law”意識的人！

“索忍尼辛、孫文、周恩來、鄧小平、許多東亞大陸民運人士與六四逃走者”等自認為是流亡者，卻是腳踏著“Free Land”，而心卻是綁著“種族沙文主義”與想著回國建立“新的種族沙文主義國”，他們是不具有“Individualism, Liberalism, Freeman, Individual person, Independent person, ,Individual freedom, Self-dignity, Self-control, Self-government, Self-responsibility, Self-protection, Self-defense, Self-happiness, Self-directed morals, Self-enforced orientation, Self-Determination of People, Limited Government, The rule of law”意識的人！

美國人的建國，是在美國獨立戰爭發生（American War of Independence，1775年—1783年）後的事情，這些建國者是美洲新大陸的住民，並非流亡者，他們沒有成為逃亡者與流亡者，他們沒有成為被外國政府或同情者包養的流亡者，他們也沒有成為“每年只會紀念流血受難者、發動抗議簽名與要求平反”的流亡者！

這些建國者敢於拿起武器同比他們武力更強大的壓迫者們戰鬥，他們是“Fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”，他們大喊“Give me liberty or give me death! ”，他們知道“Freedom is not free, you have to fight for it”，他們知道“Being a free man”的代價，他們甚至敢在《美國獨立宣言》上簽名(有56人)，他們知道簽名者若戰敗時是會被絞死的，他們並沒有煽動別人去革命流血而自己去當流亡者，他們完全敢負責任，因為他們知道他們是土地的主人！

《The United States Declaration of Independence》( JULY 4, 1776)裡說，“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”，這是由一群無神論、奴民、逃亡者與流亡者所寫出來的文字嗎？

在此《宣言》的最後，有一段文字說，“And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor. ”，這是由一群無神論、奴民、逃亡者與流亡者所許下來的承諾嗎？

2009-7-8（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

近期東亞大陸各地此起彼落地發生抗暴事件，共產黨已經完全腐爛了，共產黨已經完全技窮了，共產黨已經完全暴露弱點了，共產黨已經完全無法招架了，那些稍有腦子的人，已經可以預見共產黨的無基大廈，即將被微風吹倒了！

現在東亞大陸人只是用血肉來反抗共產黨的暴政，那些稍有腦子的人，都知道這是不對的，都知道這是不智的，都知道這是愚公式的革命法，都知道這在1989年六四已經用過了，都知道這是行不通的，你怎麼可以對一個殺人超過八千萬人的邪惡政權，使用這種愚公式的革命法？

共產黨政權完全就像是一個紙糊的老虎，你只要知道它的本質，你就可以用一根指頭完全戳破它；關鍵是你要用聰明的方法，還是要用愚公的方法來戳破它，這是我現在想說的問題！

你看，1989年六四至少死了3700人(1996年12月12日美國《Tennessee Tribune》的社論)，2009年Uighurs7‧5大抗暴死了上千人，你還要讓多少無辜的人繼續這樣地去死呢？

2008年7月1日，楊佳使用20多厘米長的單刃剔骨刀、錘子、噴霧劑、防塵面具等工具，連續殺了6名警官、連續殺傷了4名警察與1名保安，為什麼楊佳可以，而上述的3700人與上千人不可以呢？

這就是出奇不意的戰鬥法，這就是“我在暗，你在明”的戰鬥法，這就是“當武力不對稱時”的戰鬥法，這就是“以寡勝眾”的戰鬥法，它曾被“吳樾、徐錫麟、秋瑾、溫生才、林冠慈、陳敬嶽、鐘明光、林覺民、喻培倫、 史堅如 、彭家珍、馬福益、熊成基、 禹之模、佘英、劉慎終、宋玉琳、陳可君、李文甫、陸皓東、唐才常”等抗暴者使用過，聰明的你怎麼可以不知道呢？

你的武裝戰鬥對象，應該是敵人的首腦與主要巢穴，不應該是敵人的槍與坦克車；你的武裝戰鬥策略，應該是讓敵人的槍與坦克車起義，應該是讓起義的槍與坦克車對準敵人；你的武裝戰鬥目的，應該是以少勝多，不應該是平白送命，這麼簡單的道理，聰明的你怎麼可以不知道呢？

無數的“2008年的拉薩3•14流血事件”、“2008年的貴州甕安6•28群體性事件”、“2008年的雲南孟連7•19群體事件”、“2008年的湖南吉首9•24群體性事件”(2008年的吉首9•3與9•4群體性上訪堵路事件)、“2009年的湖北石首6•19事件”(2009年6月19日上午至6月20日淩晨)、“2009年的山東東明6•18群體抗議化工污染事件”、“2009年的江西南康6•15事件”、“2009年的烏魯木齊7•5流血事件”等，只是更多正義的期待，只是更多希望的落空，只是更多無謂的犧牲，當你對付有槍與砲的殺人魔鬼時，你必須切記以智取，而不是去白白送死，歷史原本就應該是由你自己來寫的，你到底應該怎麼作，聰明的你應該是知道的！

我不是主張暴力殺人，我是主張武裝革命，我是主張堅持絕對愛與正義的武裝革命，我是主張堅持絕對不錯殺一個無辜的人，我是主張每一個人應該為自己的命運戰鬥，我是主張每一個人都是一個獨立的戰鬥實體，我是主張每一個人都是一個獨立的戰鬥王國，我是主張每一個人都不應該成為所謂的口號與領袖的工具，我是主張每一個人都不應該成為所謂的口號與領袖的犧牲品！

現在是21世紀了，你應該更聰明些，更智慧些，更有效率些，你可以結合所有有志之士與正義人士，善用你們的聯合智慧，推翻暴政與獨立建國；這是你為自己命運的革命，這是你為自己後代子孫命運的革命，這同任何所謂的口號與領袖是無關的，這同任何非你土地上的住民也是無關的！

你可以作你國的國父與建國者，你不用擔心你的國太小，只要土地與人口比“梵蒂岡城國”（Status Civitatis Vaticanae，梵蒂岡城內大約有1490名常住居民，梵蒂岡面積0.44平方公里，是歐洲一個獨立的主權國）多一點即可，你是要當大國的奴民，還是小國(State)的主人呢？

如果你想成為大國的主人，那麼你可以在“你的國武力與國主權獨立”的基礎上，與任何國進行聯邦或邦聯合作，你是Freeman，你有自主權，你有自治權，你有選擇的權利，你可以選擇推動亞洲聯邦(United States of Asia, USA)或亞洲邦聯(Asian confederation)，你可以選擇加入美利堅合眾國(United States of America)或英聯邦(Commonwealth of Nations)，你可以選擇同美利堅合眾國(United States of America)或英聯邦(Commonwealth of Nations)建立軍事協防同盟(新獨立國最好的武力自衛法)，這不就是美國立國的模式？

為了確保你的武裝革命是正義的，你必須一手拿槍與一手拿《聖經》，因為《聖經》會告訴你如何使用槍，因為《聖經》會告訴你如何“Self-control, Self-government, Self-protection, Self-defense, Self-responsibility, Self-directed morals”，否則你如何能夠有正確的方式進行武裝革命呢？

為了確保你的武裝革命是正確的，你必須以美國《The Declaration of Independence》裡的“All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”等理念文字，為你國(例如，東亞大陸與港臺澳各地區)的《獨立宣言》的主要內容，否則你如何能夠有正確的方向進行獨立建國呢？

我有兩篇文章，可以供你進行“武裝革命與獨立建國”的參考：《我的武裝鬥爭與革命建國思想》與《革命與殺人的道德性基礎》 (2009-6-26)。

在你下決心舉起槍時，請你先向God禱告，確認你的“武裝革命計畫與行動”是符合《聖經》與《十誡》的，確認你是“Fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”，確認你是遵守《聖經》與《十誡》的“Freeman”，確認你是遵從良心與正義的原則(不要被任何人所蠱惑)，那麼你什麼事都可以大膽地去作，不是嗎？

2009-7-7（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

共產黨一手所導演的《零八憲章》，其內容只是《中華人民共和國憲法》的瘦身版(只是除去《中華人民共和國憲法》的序言部分) ，其精神是《中國共產黨第二次全國大會宣言》的延續(都主張建立中華聯邦共和國)，其目的是要以宣揚“和平非暴力與保皇改良主義”來取代“楊佳的武裝起義事件”思想，其目的是要以宣揚“和平非暴力與保皇改良主義的肯定共產黨政權合法性”來取代“楊佳的否定共產黨政權合法性”思想，其目的是要以宣揚“和平非暴力與保皇改良的磕頭主義”來取代“東亞大陸人由楊佳事件所啟示出來的武裝革命”思想。

參與《零八憲章》簽名的一些人，極力地將“楊佳的武裝起義事件”曲解成“楊佳暴徒的暴力殺人事件”，以此來逃避“武裝革命、以武制惡、以武除惡”的道德責任，以此來逃避成為“楊佳、林昭、吳樾、徐錫麟、秋瑾、溫生才、林冠慈、陳敬嶽、鐘明光、林覺民、喻培倫、 史堅如 、彭家珍、馬福益、熊成基、 禹之模、佘英、劉慎終、宋玉琳、陳可君、李文甫、陸皓東、唐才常、譚嗣同”等抗暴者的角色，以此來逃避“否定共產黨政權合法性、推翻共產黨非法政權、將共產黨送上審判臺、清算共產黨所有的罪行、追究共產黨所有的殺人罪行”的道德責任，以此來鞏固共產黨政權的合法性，以此來迎合共產黨的統戰目的，以此來出賣靈魂與獲得某種文人利益。

“共產黨”與“參與《零八憲章》簽名的一些人”的“前期目的”已經成功了！他們使2008年的“拉薩3•14流血事件”、2008年的“貴州甕安6•28群體性事件”、2008年的“雲南孟連7•19群體事件”、2008年的“湖南吉首9•24群體性事件”(2008年的吉首9•3與9•4群體性上訪堵路事件)、2009年的“湖北石首6•19事件” (2009年6月19日上午至6月20日淩晨)、2009年的“山東東明6•18群體抗議化工污染事件”、2009年的“江西南康6•15事件”、2009年的“烏魯木齊7•5流血事件”等，都無法順利地上升到“否定共產黨政權合法性、推翻共產黨非法政權”的“武裝革命運動”，不是嗎？

如果東亞大陸的知識份子還要為殺人政權捉刀與為虎作倀，還不肯對東亞大陸人清楚地釋放出“否定共產黨政權合法性、推翻共產黨非法政權、將共產黨送上審判臺、清算共產黨所有的罪行、追究共產黨所有的殺人罪行”的訊息，那麼你們不僅是在出賣靈魂與危害自己，那麼更是危害你們的後代子孫，你們是邪惡政權的走狗，你們是殺人政權的陪葬品，你們是人類歷史的罪人，不是嗎？
請東亞大陸人不要再受這些出賣靈魂的人的影響，請東亞大陸人認清楚“楊佳的武裝起義事件”與“楊佳的否定共產黨政權合法性”的意義，讓爾後的所有群體性事件走向“否定共產黨政權合法性、推翻共產黨非法政權”的“武裝革命運動”，如此東亞大陸人才能走出第一步，作有尊嚴的人，作真正的Freeman，作自己土地的主人，不是嗎？

2009-7-6（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

自1949年9月25日後，共產黨政權非法佔領Uighurs的居住土地，共產黨政權不斷地非法強奪Uighurs的土地資源，共產黨政權不斷地奴役與壓迫Uighurs，這是“1938年納粹納粹帝國（Nazi Deutschland, Das Deutsche Reich, Großdeutsches Reich, Drittes Reich）入侵波蘭， 並於當地成立集中營囚禁猶太人”的真實翻版，不是嗎？.

那些非法佔領Uighurs的居住土地的共產黨人是畜生與罪人，那些支持共產黨政權非法佔領Uighurs居住土地的人也是畜生與罪人，他們的良心早就被“漢種族沙文主義、大一統主義、帝國主義的魔”給吃掉了，Uighurs如何能坐視讓這群畜生與罪人繼續統治下去？.

每一個Uighur都應該“Fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”，都應該認知“Give me liberty or give me death! ”的理念，都應該成為“A true freeman”，這是你們為自己與後代子孫的責任，不是嗎？.

請你們在從事武裝戰鬥與革命時，必須將目標清楚地鎖定在邪惡的共產黨政權上，請千萬不要傷及任何無辜的人，這樣你們的行為才能體現出“Fight for individual dignity, freedom, justice, liberty, and human rights”的意義，這是正義戰爭的必要本質。

我在此為你們深切地祈禱，我希望你們盡快獨立建國成功，並且盡快與美英等國(All free countries of the world)建立軍事協防條約，以此來保障你們的Liberal democracy (or Constitutional democracy) 。

Freedom is not free！Uighurs必須用血來換取Freedom，請你們一手拿槍與一手拿《聖經》，如此你們才能在堅守“Self-respect, Self-dignity, Self-control, Self-government, Self- responsibility, Self-defense, Self-protection, Self-directed morals, Self-enforced orientation”等理念上革命成功，並且建立如同美國的Liberal democracy (or Constitutional democracy) 。

請以《The United States Declaration of Independence》( JULY 4, 1776)作為你們的獨立宣言，如此才能真正保障你們為來建立如同美國的Liberal democracy (or Constitutional democracy) 。

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

我在此奉主耶穌基督的名，願你們獨立建國成功，Amen。

2009-7-5（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）

在《The United States Declaration of Independence》(JULY 4, 1776)裡，有“All men are created equal”(所有的人是被創造平等的)的文字理念，漢文化的世界裡，總是將這句英文翻譯成“人人生而平等”，以此來省略“創造者” 與“被創造” 的概念，以此來充分地宣示其傳統無神論的立場。

事實上，人怎麼可能生而平等？不同人的身高、體重、智力、學歷、經歷、財富、能力、身體條件、家庭條件、社會地位、背景環境等，怎麼可能生而平等？這可以從人類社會，經常存在有專制、奴隸、等級制、差序位格、家長意識、特權、權威主義、種族沙文主義、法西斯主義、共產主義、大政府主義、政治干預主義等文化，可以得到充分的證明。

然而，《聖經》卻說，“So God created human beings in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.”(Genesis 1:27)、“Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.”(Genesis 2:7) 與“God created us for his glory”(Isaiah 43:1-7)，因此“所有的人是被創造平等的”這句話，在表述“Man is created in God's image”的概念 ，是指“所有人身上所獲得的God's breath, God's image and God's glory是平等的”。

“God is Love”，因此“God's breath, God's image and God's glory”的本質源於“Holy Spirit”，“God's breath, God's image and God's glory”分別代表人內在存有的“本體、形式、內涵”；基於此本質，它產生了“Human soul”、“Human conscience”、“ Human love”、“Human justice”等存有內涵，所有的人都具有相同的“Human soul”、“Human conscience”、“ Human love”、“Human justice”等內在存有內涵。

但是，由於“The nature of human free will”、 “Sin comes from free will” 與“For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23)等存在事實，因此每一個人所呈現出來的“Human soul”、“Human conscience”、“ Human love”、“Human justice”等特質程度，經常是不同的。

《聖經》說，“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”(John 3:16) 。

雖然，人類的始祖亞當與夏娃因不遵守God的誡命而犯了罪，但是主耶穌基督以其犧牲生命的贖罪祭(Sin offering)，來讓人類能夠與God關係重新和解(Reconciliation) ，並且使人類可以透過對主耶穌基督的信、望與愛，來接受God's glory與獲得Eternal life，因此God給每一個人的選擇機會也是平等的。

主耶穌基督曾說，“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”(John 14:6)與“'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself. All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”(Matthew 22:37-40)

“Man is created in God's image”，但是在人類的世界裡，人人經常是生而不平等與“Lack of freedom”；然而人類只要願意遵循“主耶穌基督愛的福音與《十誡》”，那麼人類就可以將《聖經》裡的 “All man are created equal”理念，變成人類世界裡的“All men are born free and equal, and have certain natural, essential, and unalienable rights; among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties; that of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; in fine, that of seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.” (The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780)等實質內涵，不是嗎？

2009-7-4（Hugo Liberalitas：http://hugolovelordjesuschrist.blogspot.com/）