2009年01月26日
惠譽調降台灣「本國幣」信用評等
There is no free lunch. Politico tends to cut tax and raise welfare to win votes. Yet, the debt exists until it is paid, even the politicos resign or emigrate.
天下無白吃午餐,欠債必須還錢。任何形式的賒帳必須謹慎。政治上卻以「市義」(減稅、提高福利)為名快意賒帳,得到滿堂的即時掌聲之餘,債務卻如影隨形--無論市義的主事者下台、移民,債務永遠跟隨。
...繼續閱讀2009年01月22日
2009年01月21日
英國駐台代表的關切
【Comment】
擁有公權力的司法人,捨棄法理而熱中「嘲諷」的手段,其施展的權力已經不是公權力了,這令人不安。
即使有所謂的「認罪」,並非因一方「認罪」就豁免了對方在程序上的缺失與違法。這是兩回事,卻很容易被混淆為一件事。馬的恩師孔傑榮數度警告,仍然有效。
2009年01月20日
裁軍+募兵→18萬
【Comment】
No money? MYJ regime raises debt to increase domestic demand by issuing coupons etc. He at the same time cuts military personnel from 270 thousands to 180 due to same reason of "no money". What a tricky policy can be.
Trickier is the military service system thus changes from the conscription to the voluntarism, which could mean something else under the laws of war.
以「預算不足」為由舉債「擴大內需」與「消費券」,卻也以同樣的預算不足而裁軍。所謂的政策理由,只是「口實」吧。此外,改全數募兵,是個有意思的課題! ...繼續閱讀
No money? MYJ regime raises debt to increase domestic demand by issuing coupons etc. He at the same time cuts military personnel from 270 thousands to 180 due to same reason of "no money". What a tricky policy can be.
Trickier is the military service system thus changes from the conscription to the voluntarism, which could mean something else under the laws of war.
以「預算不足」為由舉債「擴大內需」與「消費券」,卻也以同樣的預算不足而裁軍。所謂的政策理由,只是「口實」吧。此外,改全數募兵,是個有意思的課題! ...繼續閱讀
2009年01月16日
德國擔任「150打擊部隊」指揮 ■第五艦隊公關處(2009.01.14)雲程譯
【Comment】
We can learn how multinational forces operate form this release. A commodore rotation in every 6 months is one of it. That rotation brings fairness then to form parts an unity.
As usual, China Navy plays its sole trumpet outside the string quartet .
...繼續閱讀
We can learn how multinational forces operate form this release. A commodore rotation in every 6 months is one of it. That rotation brings fairness then to form parts an unity.
As usual, China Navy plays its sole trumpet outside the string quartet .
...繼續閱讀
誰?主權獨立!
【Comment】 DPP said ROC=Taiwan and ROC vs. PRC while KMT insist "we" and "two sides" across the strait. Because Formosa and the Pescadores are in fact a home-ruled territory people then can not be sure "which" should be the subject of "sovereign independent".
「誰」,才是關鍵;其餘,都是「嘴花」! ...繼續閱讀
「誰」,才是關鍵;其餘,都是「嘴花」! ...繼續閱讀
顏慶章發警語...兩岸經貿逾越WTO規範 ■自由(2009.01.12)
【Comment】
Two members China and TPKM of WTO concluded four agreements and plan to conclude more. Are those agreements in breach of WTO legal framework? My question is beyond this. The status of the two is the core issue. Is the two a central and a local government under municipal law? Or the two gave the other a de facto recognition under laws of war? If it is the former, then MYJ is trying to change the status of Formosa and the Pescadores into China. If the latter is the story, then Beijing is the sucker. ...繼續閱讀
Two members China and TPKM of WTO concluded four agreements and plan to conclude more. Are those agreements in breach of WTO legal framework? My question is beyond this. The status of the two is the core issue. Is the two a central and a local government under municipal law? Or the two gave the other a de facto recognition under laws of war? If it is the former, then MYJ is trying to change the status of Formosa and the Pescadores into China. If the latter is the story, then Beijing is the sucker. ...繼續閱讀
2009年01月10日
中央指揮部第五艦隊建立打擊海盜武力 ■USCENTCOM(2009.01.09)雲程譯

看完美國「中央指揮部」(USCENTCOM)的新聞稿之後,可以體會軍人並非「武夫」,即使軍事行動也要時時注意行動的「授權」。
相對於新聞所披露:國安會與陸委會欲派拉法葉的作為,我們只覺得──「冗談吧?」連媒體的報導都是荒腔走板。
...繼續閱讀
外交私有化(diplomacy as a personal property)
【Comment】
It seem the future of West Pacific Rim is in his hand, not us.
Before reading this, please check this website first.
Well, if KMT has not been informed other related nations must not have been informed neither.
Can the plenary power(國家大權), including the power to wage war and to conclude agreements, a private property of a person?
Another question would be "does secret diplomacy or agreements valid?" under the constitution and international law as well. ...繼續閱讀
It seem the future of West Pacific Rim is in his hand, not us.
Before reading this, please check this website first.
Well, if KMT has not been informed other related nations must not have been informed neither.
Can the plenary power(國家大權), including the power to wage war and to conclude agreements, a private property of a person?
Another question would be "does secret diplomacy or agreements valid?" under the constitution and international law as well. ...繼續閱讀
2009年01月9日