政經來評論分類文章 顯示方式:簡文 | 列表

2009年01月24日

◆請勿以「情緒」埋葬「管理」

觀看中國的新聞,總覺得報導中的「形容詞」過多。說清楚一點,就是「濫情」。
多年前唸書時,邏輯或思考方面的書就強調,閱讀書籍或新聞時要非常注意「形容詞」,因為形容詞過多,會偷偷的影響閱讀者的分析能力。朋友曾經拿《環球時報》給我看,那似乎是報導國際新聞為主的媒體,屬於《人民日報》的一環。從選材來說,議題遍及全球,實屬上乘。不過,報導結論總是不脫西洋帝國主義欺負中國等「民族主義」那套,令人不敢恭維。壞了選材的美意,if any。
國民素質,就這樣,在潛移默化中受到塑造--也只會以「濫情」面對世界。

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!10:49回應(0)引用(0)

◆654號解釋,會破功?

The Constitutional Court made its decision. The detainees have the constitutional right to meet and discuss with his or her layer in secret. It is the basic feature of democracy that all people should have the right to access a fair trial. It is so simple and fundamental. Pity, Taiwan judicial branch cares not the due process of law for the court martial practice since 1945 allies' occupation as well as 38-year long martial law.
However,

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!9:11回應(0)引用(0)

2009年01月23日

◆美中因台灣在WHO角力過??

Comment

There was a MOU (memorandum of understanding) between China and WHO in 2005. In the MOU, WHO agreed that Taiwan's participation in WHO should under the consent of Beijing. However, something happened between 2005 and 2009. The news reveals today says the MOU is not applied.
Pity, we are the core of the issue yet we do not know it a bit.
...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!14:19回應(0)引用(0)

2009年01月16日

◆索馬利亞海盜與地位問題

Comment

UN Security Council asked International community sent war ships to help the anti-pirates mission is not an issue that ROC can get involve. ROC is not an UN member, is not invited by Somalia Transitional Government and has no right to inform UN Secretary etc. Thus ROC has no status in this issue. However, MYJ claimed to take part. He runs regime as a media game. How lousy and untrue leader he is.

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!9:02回應(0)引用(0)

2009年01月14日

◆希拉蕊的「巧權力」(Smart Power)

Comment

希拉蕊開宗明義的提到將加強與傳統盟友的合作,其中居然包括印度。而美國對於中國,則取決於中國對內對外的決定。顯然,親疏有別。

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!10:04回應(0)引用(0)

2009年01月12日

◆與Ajin閒聊美元與經濟

前次在Ajin的部落格看見一篇文章:重商主義的局限:全球失衡和中國國際經濟關係中即將面臨的危機,非常有趣的概念,就想思考一下回應,因事延宕之後。又看見一篇紐約時報:中國開始停購美國債 ,兩個有趣的概念相逼,那就不能不動手整理了。 ...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!14:41回應(1)引用(0)

2009年01月10日

◆UN歌劇反海盜,中國軍艦拉二胡

Comment

從時間軸的觀點看,國際社會要中國加入以美軍(或北約等組織)為主導的國際聯合軍事行動,是一種「教化」的過程。

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!17:10回應(0)引用(0)

2009年01月9日

◆我擬派拉艦 赴亞丁灣護航

Comment

The UN Security Council authorized a multi-national anti-pirates operation in Somalia off-shore by the Resolution No. 1851 passed on Dec. 16, 2008.
Can non-member state entity send war ships there according to the Resolution?
...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!13:17回應(1)引用(0)

2009年01月8日

◆松山和羽田直航?「包機提議」而已!

Comment

The proposal of the direct flight between SungShang airport and Haneda airport is not a new one. MYJ said it before in 2006 when he visited Japan. The NSC also evaluated the charter possibility in this July. Though he said so, MYJ created the direct flight between Taiwan and China in few months after his inauguration. The charter between SungShan and Haneda is a lie, which he told too many, or a "reluctant" balance of power? We shall see.

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!8:54回應(0)引用(0)

2009年01月1日

◆評:胡錦濤〈紀念告台灣同胞書〉

Comment

Literally, Hu's speech is a good one. However, the inference is wrong due to the wrong premise.
Taiwan Question is from 1945, not 1949 as Hu said.

Hu's scenario is based on KMT-CCP civil war. It involves the question of "who is the legitimate government of China". It is nothing to do with Formosa and the Pecasdores or Taiwan and Penghu. It is an residual issue of or SFPT or UN.

Pity, MYJ's sayings and doings are exactly the same as Hu's.

...繼續閱讀

Posted by hoonting at 樂多Roodo!20:27回應(2)引用(0)
 [第一頁]  [1]  [2]  [3]  [4]  [5]  [6]  [7]  [最終頁]