雲程的雙魚鏡

...繼續閱讀

通用汽車（General Motors）上周宣佈，中國的汽車銷量已經超越美國。聽起來，這一時刻似乎具有重大歷史意義，甚至還可能具備政治意義。

但是，雖然中國正朝著世界第一大汽車市場順利邁進，那個時刻仍尚未來臨。

...繼續閱讀

新加坡國營投資機構淡馬錫控股公司（Temasek）10日表示，到去年11月為止的八個月內虧損約390億美元，投資組合價值縮水31%。

淡馬錫是在宣布更換執行長數日後公布這項虧損數據。掌舵近七年的執行長何晶將於10月下台，遺缺由必和必拓公司（BHP Billiton）前執行長古德益（Charles Goodyear）接任。

...繼續閱讀

【Abstract】CKS admitted that Taiwan (Formosa and the Pescadores) were merely a trust territory.
The opinion derived from the occupation after Pacific War. The Allies grated occupation power not to China, neither ROC nor PRC, but to Generalissimo Chiang-Kai-shek by the General Order No.1.
As an occupation authority, neither CKS nor ROC was granted any power to change the status of the territories. The "KMT-CCP Platform" also holds no power to do other way. Instead, from CKS to MYJ bear the legal liability to preserve Taiwan intact including her foreign exchange reserves, no matter how long.

...繼續閱讀

【Comment】口口聲聲要人下台，那是政治語言，或至少代表自己不用功。
但劉兆玄在立法院強力反駁立委依據經濟學家專業判斷的質詢，反而斬釘截鐵認定景氣在2008年第四季轉好；卻多次告誡閣員：「最壞情況還沒來」（自由時報2009.02.09 A3版）。這一定要講。
他的能力，特別是「民可使由之，不可使知之」心腸，讓我們擔心。
但他，也有可能信以為「治大國如烹小鮮」，不，如寫武俠小說般簡單就可以呢～，這讓我們更擔心，不，憤怒！ ...繼續閱讀

【Abstract】When Former Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative, Joseph Chao-hsieh Wu was asked the opinion on the lawsiut, Wu said if the US failed the case it means Taiwan is independent.
Also, he replied that Taiwan is an independent country because she is exercising"de facto sovereignty". What is "de facto sovereignty"?
...繼續閱讀

【Comment】A single lawsuit impacts the foreign policy of the US toward East Asia, especially Taiwan and China. It is a brand new WOW situation. Since it is a WOW, the parties involve should consider it from the ground zero. Those who are old fashioned may get hurt and pay heavy cost in the future.

...繼續閱讀

【Comment】Taiwan Question is a result of the Second World War. But most DPP members as well as some agitators just neglect and refuse to accept its consequences. Their reasoning is flaw from the beginning. They follow the propaganda of KMT that Taiwan Question is just a matter on KMT-CCP civil war.
DPP needs CHANGE totally.

...繼續閱讀

台灣的未來在對日和約的訴訟上　■Michael Richardson, Boston Progressive Examiner（2009.01.28）雲程譯

少有人知悉但針對「對日和約」非常重要的訴訟正在美國上訴法院進行，這訴訟可能迫使美國對台灣前途與中國發生對立。

中國認為華民國（或通常認為的台灣）是叛離的省分，而台灣應該與大陸「統一」，但這論點和歷史事實不符。中國從未擁有台灣－－台灣屬於日本，並在〈舊金山和約〉中割讓給美國。

...繼續閱讀

有關台灣條約的審判，法庭被擠爆　■Michael Richardson/ Boston Progressive Examiner（2009.02.05）雲程譯

在哥倫比亞特區的美國上訴法院的法庭內擠滿人僅容立足空間，三位法官的庭聽取兩造對於正式終止二次大戰的1952年〈舊金山和約〉之詮釋。 ...繼續閱讀