<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>石頭記 vs. 壽頭記</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/honeypie/archives/8168203.html/</link>
<description><![CDATA[終於找到對照組，可以做版本比較了。]]>
	</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/honeypie/archives/8168203-comment.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>回應：石頭記 vs. 壽頭記</title>
	<description><![CDATA[好利害的揶揄阿
哪個公司給他們出了專輯也真是夠高級了

一般電台很難得聽見的
太棒了!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/honeypie/archives/8168203.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/honeypie/archives/8168203.html#comment-18624247</guid>
		<category>文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:17:10 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>