<< 樂多夏日傳說之扛棒 100, 11/30 | 回blog首頁 | 樂多夏日傳說之扛棒 100, 13/30 >>

August 3,2007

樂多夏日傳說之扛棒 100, 12/30

拍了這麼多照片後
我發現用霓虹燈管當招牌的店家
其實還真不少

不知道各位看完我的照片後
有沒有覺得哪些產業的店家使用霓虹燈管的機率比較高?

根據我未正式統計的觀察
在我的活動範圍中
使用霓虹招牌機率比較高的是:
鑰匙印章, 檳榔, 情趣用品, 眼鏡, 髮廊, 服飾

當然啦
那種只在招牌外框加一圈霓虹燈管的
不在此列...

本來想趁白天整理好照片
一次把文章跟照片都秀出來
不要再待續
但白天還是忙到沒時間弄照片
所以...
照片待續... XD

Kan Ban 57% 文山當舖 @ 景美, 1
Kan Ban 57% 文山當舖 @ 景美, 1

Kan Ban 57% 文山當舖 @ 景美, 2
Kan Ban 57% 文山當舖 @ 景美, 2

Kan Ban 58% 和風會館 涮涮鍋 @ 板橋
Kan Ban 58% 和風會館 涮涮鍋 @ 板橋

Kan Ban 59% 汽機車停車場 @ 基隆, 1
Kan Ban 59% 汽機車停車場 @ 基隆, 1

Kan Ban 59% 汽機車停車場 @ 基隆, 2
Kan Ban 59% 汽機車停車場 @ 基隆, 2

Kan Ban 60% 基隆關稅局 @ 基隆
Kan Ban 60% 基隆關稅局 @ 基隆

Kan Ban 61% 金金 HOTEL @ 基隆, 1
Kan Ban 61% 金金 HOTEL @ 基隆, 1

Kan Ban 61% 金金 HOTEL @ 基隆, 2
Kan Ban 61% 金金 HOTEL @ 基隆, 2

Kan Ban 62% 基隆公車總站 @ 基隆
Kan Ban 62% 基隆公車總站 @ 基隆

Kan Ban 63% KEELUNG @ 基隆
Kan Ban 63% KEELUNG @ 基隆

圖說:
2. 當鋪招牌下方的箭頭正好指向大潤發看板的方向
令人不禁想問: 典當請到大潤發? :P
4-10. 基隆的照片都是在車站附近拍的
應某位觀眾的要求而放上來囉
其中, 10. 的感覺很像 HOLLYHOOD
本來有不少顏色變化, 包括紅色粉紅紫色藍色等等
但我當天拍的時候發現
好像已經秀逗到只剩下黃色跟綠色的變化了...


(圖片來源: 我的 flickr 相簿)

Posted by hikawac at 樂多Roodo! │02:00 │回應(23) │引用(0) │沒有挑戰, 人生是黑白的
樂多分類：藝術/設計 共同主題：扛棒-商業與藝術之間 工具：編輯本文
Ads by Roodo! 

引用URL

http://cgi.blog.roodo.com/trackback/3855461
回應文章
>有沒有覺得哪些產業的店家使用霓虹燈管的機率比較高?
酒店..... = = +
Posted by D at August 3,2007 23:31
樓上很有經驗 XD
Posted by alann at August 5,2007 09:09
XD 看新聞的..看新聞的...
Posted by D at August 5,2007 23:42
>>10. 的感覺很像 HOLLYHOOD
版主.. 您的照片有標號ㄇ? @@
這樣熊熊說.. 不知道你指哪張照片哩? |||
Posted by jcool at August 7,2007 09:56
to D

這個
我呼應一下輪大
>樓上很有經驗 XD
+1

to 輪大

+1

to D

有沒有聽過此地無銀三百兩? :P

to jcool

我是想說讓大家複習一下算數的能力
以免老年癡呆... :P
Posted by hikawac at August 7,2007 10:09
敢問貴寶地有三百兩嗎?
有沒有? 沒有嘛....
那小弟說沒有三百兩還被質疑...這...社會變了...(T ～ T)...
Posted by D at August 7,2007 10:42
請問照片-景美拍的文山當舖 你有拍到他的電話號碼嘛?謝謝
Posted by 路人甲 at April 8,2009 19:39
不確定耶
這2007年的文章了... XD
Posted by hikawac at April 9,2009 19:59
>不確定耶
>這2007年的文章了... XD

XD
And~, you still replied and explained.
You are "good man"! *發卡* XD
Posted by YY at April 10,2009 05:28
.........|||

這年頭
什麼人都可以發好人卡嗎?
保全!!!
Posted by hikawac at April 10,2009 09:17
>這年頭
>什麼人都可以發好人卡嗎?
>保全!!!

這年頭
什麼人都可以保全嗎?
發卡!!!!

PS. This is a demo of reply w/o typing. ^++++^
Posted by YY at April 10,2009 16:12
>PS. This is a demo of reply w/o typing. ^++++^
but you DID type.
so
this is a bad example. XD
Posted by hikawac at April 14,2009 10:31
>this is a bad example. XD

The lines above PS are copy/paste.
copy/paste is no typing. XD
Posted by YY at April 14,2009 13:46
but you type a lot more after that.
so...
still lousy demo...(攤)
Posted by hikawac at April 14,2009 16:03
>but you type a lot more after that.

迷辦法啊~
similar to the 圖說 of your 扛棒 pictures:
Though 扛棒 pictures are perfect and self-explained, but
without the 圖說, there are always idiots,
excluding you or me of course,
舉手發問. XP
Posted by YY at April 14,2009 16:22
>there are always idiots
who do you imply?
:P
Posted by hikawac at April 14,2009 16:26
>>excluding you or me of course,
you or me... meaning... only one of you is not "i"? XD....
ps. be cautious when u answer martian's questions, grandpa.. :p
Posted by jcool at April 14,2009 16:58
>>who do you imply?
is that a 扛棒 title too? @@"
Posted by jcool at April 14,2009 17:00
>>who do you imply?
>is that a 扛棒 title too? @@"

Ccccc, 心照不宣. XD
Posted by YY at April 14,2009 17:02
to jcool,

>>excluding you or me of course,
>you or me... meaning... only one of you is not "i"? XD....
i lost you... XD

to jcool & YY,

>is that a 扛棒 title too? @@"
>Ccccc, 心照不宣. XD
not sure you mean what i meant... :P
Posted by hikawac at April 14,2009 17:42
>not sure you mean what i meant... :P

Guess you meant: "are you thinking what i'm thinking?"

While google at the above, you'll also find an
噁心 expression:
"are you thinking of me when you're putting on your makeup" *噁*
Posted by YY at April 14,2009 17:51
>>>you or me... meaning... only one of you is not "i"? XD....
>>i lost you... XD
OK...this is a "logic" question...
when you say "excluding you or me", meaning excluding you or excluding me, while only one can be excluded .... that also implies...one of you that's not excluded could still be "i"... XDD....
ps. grandpa... that's the trap of martian's question... ~"~
Posted by jcool at April 15,2009 00:16
隨著時代的變遷，當舖經營也越來越華麗，許多當舖的擺設也各式各樣了，而對於急需用錢的時候，害怕會因此招惹上高利貸，就不敢去，但選擇合法當舖，他跟高利貸是不同的。貨幣資金的融通，那麼當事人就可以通過各種方式到金融市場去融資。只要把融資搞好了，一著棋活，就全盤皆活。而在資金調動上自然比較便利，借錢也很方便、便利!
Posted by youyouchun at November 6,2009 18:25


回最上方