<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>文學與音樂，全死在長尾裡! </title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/good_morning_press/archives/5750903.html/</link>
<description><![CDATA[Paul Simon 對我說：「我反對web 2.0，就好像我反對自己的死亡。」是的，長尾理論害死了音樂。它扭曲了Web 2.0的真相，給了人們不切實際的期待！假如現有的Web 2.0發展方向不變，所有創作──文學與音樂──都將死亡。長尾理論所標榜的美麗新未來，不但無法降臨，還會帶來更大的災難！]]>
	</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/good_morning_press/archives/5750903-comment.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>回應：文學與音樂，全死在長尾裡! </title>
	<description><![CDATA[所以ㄚ，總要找出比較理想的現實，或是比較現實的理想。]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/good_morning_press/archives/5750903.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/good_morning_press/archives/5750903.html#comment-16155259</guid>
		<category>文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:33:42 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：文學與音樂，全死在長尾裡! </title>
	<description><![CDATA[這就是所謂的理想與現實呀……]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/good_morning_press/archives/5750903.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/good_morning_press/archives/5750903.html#comment-16143187</guid>
		<category>文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:37:08 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>