2006年02月9日
[推薦閱讀] 既得利益的暴政
本週出刊的台灣商業周刊 951 期挑選了馬丁沃夫 (Martin Wolf) 2006.1.17 的專欄, 原本英文標題為 Tyranny of Vested Interests, 譯者將其改為: 唯有「競爭」能打倒既得利益高牆。 摘錄部分文章於下:
...繼續閱讀
2006年02月6日
[轉貼] The libertarian option
The libertarian option from Adam Smith Institution Blog
According to the Cato Institute's David Boaz in the Wall Street Journal recently, Gallup polls show that around 20% of the US population are neither liberal nor conservative but libertarian – opposing the use of government either to "promote traditional values" or to "do too many things that should be left to individuals and businesses."
So where, he asks, are the libertarians in politics and the media? With big-government conservatives spending money like Imelda Marcos in a shoe store, there seems to be nobody to represent the country's libertarians. The Democrats vote against tax cuts and Social Security privatization. The Republicans want to ban abortion and gay partnerships. Media debate divides simply into either pro-Bush or (mostly) anti-Bush. What's a libertarian to do?
Along with Gallup, exit polls suggest that Boaz is right, and that there are large numbers of unrepresented Americans who just hate government pushing them around. About 17m of those who voted for John Kerry did not think the government should do more to solve the country's problems. And 28m Bush voters support either gay marriage or civil unions. That's 45m people with broadly libertarian views. But, says Boaz, you'd never know it from watching TV, or listening to elected politicians.