http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319997 文章回應 Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:16:39 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319995 genehong@gmail.com(黑貘) 文章回應 Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:52:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319993 文章回應 Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:56:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319991 文章回應 Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:11:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319989 genehong@gmail.com(黑貘) 文章回應 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:50:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319987 文章回應 Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:26:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319985 文章回應 Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:48:39 +0800 pc@ncc.gov.com: 若是說, TCP/IP 就等於 Internet Protocol, 甚至是說包含所有 Internet Protocol 的話, 我想我說 "非同步存取與(進階)使用者互動" 就是 Web 2.0 的話就沒有問題了... 但我想您也知道 Internet Protocol 包含 TCP/IP, TCP/IP 必不包含所有的 Internet Protocol, 但為甚麼會有人會以 TCP/IP 來稱呼所有 Internet Protocol, 甚至畫上等號呢? 甚至可以說, Web 2.0 也不包含所有的 Web 2.0 這樣的 Folksonomies, 甚至在我眼中的 Web 2.0, 更 "不包含" 前兩項, 只是沒有人會管我的定義...]]> http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319983 gene@tamshui.tw(食夢黑貘) 文章回應 Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:17:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319981 pc@ncc.gov.com(請問) 文章回應 Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:59:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html http://blog.roodo.com/genehong/archives/2194725.html#comment-9319979 文章回應 Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:22:28 +0800