http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16160933 文章回應 Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:35:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16154069 pigson@yahoo.com.tw(PGCHUI) 文章回應 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:44:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16152793 文章回應 Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:46:39 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16144129 文章回應 Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:38:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16143407 asuma.ee90g@nctu.edu.tw(Targus) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:05:24 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16143239 asuma.ee90g@nctu.edu.tw(Targus) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:43:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16143015 hychen84@hotmail.com(pekka) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:16:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16142985 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 22:10:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16141809 dino@url.com.tw(dino) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:33:32 +0800 http://www.anti-media.tw/blog/blog_notes.php?uid=9923&pid=117003 中油工會打算玩啥把戲---想當馬廢帝的前鋒---一目瞭然!!! 只願民進黨政府能挺住!!!]]> http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16141749 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:24:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16141291 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:08:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16141257 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:01:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16141085 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:35:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16140585 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:04:52 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16140413 ll8221@yahoo.com.tw(Tiger) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:36:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16140225 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:58:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16140221 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:57:44 +0800 http://blog.pixnet.net/cosette119/post/15959104 http://www.merit-times.com.tw/NewsPage.aspx?unid=79265 其中第一篇數字寫得很堂皇，不過那是唬你用的 整篇重點還是在「用油大戶」四個字 但是用油大戶是誰，這跟營養午餐一樣 不過都是拿來打擊政敵的空泛名詞罷了 簡單的說，如果把這四個字抽掉，以上論述都不過是坨屎而已]]> http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16140039 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:29:31 +0800 這對不開車，或用油量小的民眾不公平 綜觀牛屎台全文，主要觀點是建立在這一句話上 只能說他們在輿論製造上是相當有心得的 隨時隨地捏出一個「受害者」來當作論述重心 這樣的論述有幾個優點－ 1.顯明易懂，不需要太精密的邏輯即可理解 當然邏輯不精密的結果，會變成每個論述都變成個案 這是統媒論述常出現的矛盾所在 2.也由於顯明易懂，加上媒體大力放送 所以在辯論上比較佔優勢 通常來講這樣的論述大多建立在錯誤前提上 但問題是，這個錯誤前提很容易懂，所以也容易混淆真相 一般綠營民眾在沒有精密邏輯訓練的情況下很容易被唬 這應該也是綠營聲音通常比較小的原因之一]]> http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16140005 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:21:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139993 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:19:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139853 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:53:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139767 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:37:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139743 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:33:19 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139539 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:52:05 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139529 asuma.ee90g@nctu.edu.tw(Targus) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:48:17 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139525 hansalu@hotmail.com(hansalu) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:47:35 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139491 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:39:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139439 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:28:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139437 myself0826@hotmail.com(Dina) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:28:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139417 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:25:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139403 clould_kao@yahoo.com.tw(kkkk) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:22:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139389 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:19:07 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139299 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:06:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139263 leikochang@gmail.com(Brenda) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:01:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139247 chin6165@ms71.hinet.net(wood7314) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:57:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139193 twk166@yahoo.com.tw(怪人) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:47:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16139021 addyd2g@yahoo.com.tw(addy) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:17:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16138879 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:52:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16138709 ykhuang@gmail.com(ykhuang) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:24:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16137261 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:39 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16137223 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:45:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16137127 ulyho@yahoo.com.tw(顧著踢面桶) 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:18:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16136985 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:03:36 +0800 500萬人)衝去台塑加油站搶加油才對吧? XD 還真是口嫌體正直啊~ 至於有些新聞中訪問一堆人在中油加油站加油，卻在接受訪問時說支持漲價，還真是另人錯亂~ 好想跟他們說，你們跑錯加油站囉，台塑的就在附近~~]]> http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html http://blog.roodo.com/gamy543/archives/5793893.html#comment-16136981 文章回應 Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:00:52 +0800