January 4,2007
一人一信抗議《時代雜誌》偏頗報導
請大家踴躍參與一人一信抗議《時代雜誌》偏頗報導運動(請見下面酥餅提供的抗議信範本)
台灣平埔：《時代》將扁家排名才是2006最大醜聞
這世界根本是非不分，美國《時代周刊》的突鎚將台灣扁家案列入世界十大醜聞排名第五，對台灣造成嚴重的傷害，所有台灣人都不能視而不見。
雖然人微言輕，但是，我要強烈建議，與其被誣哭泣瞪卵葩，不如一人一信反擊，讓世界知道真相。
全世界再也找不出像台灣總統這麼清廉的領導人了。陳總統上任七年，薪水自動減半，七年來每月所領的總統薪水，跟退休的副總統連戰十八趴的月利二十多萬相差無幾。
日理萬機當2000多萬人的台灣總統阿扁，還要不勝其煩地為近千張發票中有100多元新台幣、5塊美金不到的發票沖帳傷神，如此不含糊，只為了配合制度；而這個制度是中國黨審計部90幾年來首度布下的陷井，就是要台灣黨的總統往下跳。
《時代》當然不知道，台灣現在的檢察、法官、審計，幾乎全是二二八屠台菁英數萬的他媽的兩蔣制度下的私辦。
《時代》當然不知道，中國黨無人性法官將重病體弱三十公斤不到的總統夫人，當作重犯一樣看待，當庭休克送醫後，還要頻頻催促是否可以就審，甚至撂話可以躺在病床上就審。
《時代》當然不知道，為台灣民主被黑車撞三輾而腿殘半生的阿扁總統夫人，名下那些發票是給敵前賣命的工作人員的國務機密費用。
《時代》當然不知道，逼阿扁拿出潛中諜報人員名單，否則即要予以重重求刑的法檢，是所謂「祖國中國」的座上客。
《時代》當然不知道，中國黨五十多年執政，天天都在公然內線上下其手沒事，而趙家平民父子買股票卻被判盜國罪。
《時代》當然不知道，中國黨主席馬英九在市長任內公然貪瀆八年特別費，每月匯入私戶至今沒事，還有阿扁的閣魁幫他共業。
《時代》當然不知道，中國黨馬主席隨便一賣黨產（其實是台灣國產）就幾百億落袋，台灣黨游主席即使變賣光家當財產來解黨的窘境，淨值仍然是負569萬。
最後，《時代》當然不知道，在刺扁案中彈的阿扁，是不願台灣倒而硬撐著腰走進奇美醫院急診的苦主、英雄，還以為他真的是輸不起的中國黨抹黑的自導自演老千。
美國《時代周刊》信箱：letters@time.com
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
一人一信抗議時代雜誌偏頗報導
作者：酥餅
時代雜誌在一篇名為
抗議方法
一、按這裡。
二、標體打上「Prosecution of President Chen's wife is not a scandal」
三、拷貝下面這封抗議信。
Dear Editor,
You list prosecution of President Chen’s wife as top 10 scandals in 2006. However, you fail to mention that many people believe it is just a minor administrative error.
President Chen voluntarily cut his own salary by more than a million dollars and returned a special fund which is worth tens of millions of dollars and can be spent whatever way he pleases. It’s hard to believe that he would use such a troublesome and risky way, meaning asking his wife to collect more than 700 personal receipts from his family and friends, to pocket less than half million dollars of state fund. President Chen’s claim that the use of personal receipts is to fund the secret diplomacy is much more believable given Taiwan’s international status.
In addition, the constitution of Taiwan prevents the President from being charged except for treason. It is to protect the presidency not any particular President let alone a “tailored Teflon suit” for President Chen. The wording is very bias and far away from truth.
As one of the most influential news magazines, Time should strive to report the truth and the whole truth. Please correct the bias wording and make an effort to let your readers know the other side of the story. Otherwise, you will lose my trust and my subscription.
四、把信寄到letters@time.com
歡迎大家分享你所寫的抗議信，本文歡迎轉貼，期待能讓更多朋友參與這個活動。
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
近日新文章：
「2006年十大醜聞」的報導中，將國務機要費案列為第五名，報導內容偏重特定觀點，甚至將憲法賦予總統的刑事免責權形容成為陳總統個人量身訂作的鐵氟龍外套，有失媒體平衡報導之責，我發起一人一信運動向時代雜誌抗議，並要求他們報導完整的事實。引用URL
美國《時代周刊》 信箱：letters@time.com
有範本, 我一定寄!
http://blog.roodo.com/subing/archives/2618682.html
謝謝妳，我看到了，己將他的文章同時轉貼到這欄裡面，並將轉貼到大元及蕃薯藤時事自由廣場去！
=============================
時代不知道在台中國人的對台灣人的狼毒心態，甚至連一個病弱女人吳淑珍第一夫人也不放過！
我已寄出了!
絕對支持抗議時代雜誌偏頗報導.謝謝你熱心告知.這就去寄信.
另外請看此新聞~~日媒：美日將聯手會商台海緊急計畫
http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/7/1/4/n1578819.htm
NON NON：謝謝妳的熱烈支持！
阿茵發起另一個抗議運動，也請大家來支持和響應：
拒看TVBS，一人一信抗議＜瀝青鴨事件＞陷害台灣鴨農
http://blog.roodo.com/fairy220/archives/2611625.html
信件標題：Unjust and unbalanced report on Taiwan
內容：
Dear Sir,
Your report on the trouble in Taiwan in your list of top ten scandals in 2006 is unjust and outrageously unbalanced.
Unjust is your description by stating that our president seems to be wearing a consitutionally tailored Teflon suit. Our Constitution stipulates that our president is immune from criminal charges except treason. Such a principle applies to all presidents elected in Taiwan to protect the office, as in the US, your president is also immune from civil lawsuits, perhaps not all criminal charges. But after President Chen steps down, he is a normal citizen, no longer protected by such immunity. This constitutional design is common among many countries, even to international organizations, as in EU.
Outrageously unbalanced is there are other opinions that our president and his families are not the roots of these scandals. Ms Shaheen in Wall Street Journal (November 08, 2006) wrote that they are attacked because some "refuse-to-lose" parties and people have intended to hamper his regime. Such opinions and possibilities are nowhere to be found in your report.
Yours as an influential magazine, a flimsy and biased report as such is unacceptable to many Taiwanese readers.
Sincerely,
A Reader
![[Syndicate this site]](http://cdn.rimg.tw/images/blog/rss.gif "Syndicate RSS feed"){kind=small}
![[Syndicate this site]](http://cdn.rimg.tw/images/blog/atom.gif "Syndicate ATOM feed"){kind=small}
