<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>豪爾的藝文筆記</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao</link>
<description><![CDATA[一段追尋本質之無窮形式的路程]]>
	</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/recent-comment.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>回應：女王首部曲之張無忌：Anne-Sophie Mutter音樂會札記</title>
	<description><![CDATA[come to our 古典音樂 討論區 

in <a href='http://www.discuss.com.hk' rel='nofollow'>www.discuss.com.hk</a>

many classical music fans there.]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/510474.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/510474.html#comment-16319459</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:35:11 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：女王首部曲之張無忌：Anne-Sophie Mutter音樂會札記</title>
	<description><![CDATA[come to our 古典音樂 討論區 

in <a href='http://www.discuss.com.hk' rel='nofollow'>www.discuss.com.hk</a>

there are many classical music fans.]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/510474.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/510474.html#comment-16319443</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:33:11 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：頭好壯壯的小提琴家</title>
	<description><![CDATA[哈!
學音樂的人,不頭好壯壯才奇怪
這行根本就是高級苦工嘛~~
每天把琴架在脖子上鋸
想不練出肌肉都很難呢!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116018.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116018.html#comment-9220095</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:10:16 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：再見天心！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[我跟吳天心從小就在"競技場"上認識
當時我們常在台灣的各大音樂比賽中
切磋彼此的琴藝

沒想到這麼多年過去
大家也都各奔東西發展去了...

記憶還一直停留在圓圓胖胖的她
不過看樣子現在的她已蛻變為舞台上閃亮的星

期許自己也要努力啊~~~~]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/461950.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/461950.html#comment-9220119</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:05:50 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：鐘樓怪人才不是主角！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[刚看完＜钟楼怪影＞，我似乎陶醉在里边美丽的曲子里．．虽然演员们的动作表演有欠缺；但作为歌剧演员，他们是在用自己的声音来表达人物的心理．他们是个整体．
我没有机会看现场的演出，可能和你的感觉不同；你很喜欢巴黎圣母院吧？对人物的观察严格，你也许真的很失望；可为什么不换一面想，排演一部歌剧所要花费的经历．他们作的不完美，可有值得尊崇的地方，你不能说：太烂．]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116030.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116030.html#comment-9220107</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 21:36:42 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：好啊！十面埋伏！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[Oh..after reading your article, it makes me feel like to see this performance! Chialing]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/1336737.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/1336737.html#comment-9220135</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:39:41 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：虎虎生風：Lorin Maazel &amp; NSO</title>
	<description><![CDATA[Howard, welcome back to the concert hall!
I went to Kissin's recital in Barbican, the selection of music was great, somehow after a long day and a rush through trains and tube, felt so exhausted, and could not really appreciate his first half, but when he played Chopin, it got better. The whole atmosphere changed tremendously. I guess Kissin, as he said in his interview, felt closer to Chopin than other Romantics.
Would not say it was not a heart-warming concert, yet it was definately an alarming call to myself for the lack of empty space for music and joy! 
However, I do agree with your opinion on Maazel, I heard him twice in London and in Dresden, unlike Rattle, his conduction is not as refreshing or striking, but always shows a certain order and orthodox temperament!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/1274592.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/1274592.html#comment-9220133</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:43:52 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：虎虎生風：Lorin Maazel &amp; NSO</title>
	<description><![CDATA[雖不好說你的耳朵很挑,但是聽的心情也會影響對樂團的評價.]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/1274592.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/1274592.html#comment-9220131</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:58:31 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：Eifman Ballet: Russian Hamlet  艾夫曼芭蕾：俄國哈姆雷特</title>
	<description><![CDATA[To 需要重新學習的人, this is such an unkind remark. I think it is you who has been sober and cynical, as well as undermining other people's good effort of writing and supports to art. Shame on you!
However, it should not be me responding this. I am just a 路見不平,雞婆的老學究. 

To Howard et al, 
Hope Howard is not frustrated by this passer! 
Enough of unbeautiful site. As a music love, I am happy to raise your attention to the rich programme of the 'Bites' at the Barbican.
March 7, Evgeny Kissin's resital is worthy a good waiting for!

In Brighton (St Peter's Church),
March 11, The Tallis Scholars are going to present "Allegri's Miserere". This will be a heart-melting concert.

Envy me?]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/848613.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/848613.html#comment-9220129</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:12:47 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：鐘樓怪人才不是主角！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[你們這些人才像屁一樣,那你們去創作一部這樣的"爛"劇,切,你們做出來的恐怕連屎都算不上,理解的真差阿,連克婁潘都可以說是女主角的兄長,沒知識的一堆]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116030.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116030.html#comment-9220105</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:13:51 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：Eifman Ballet: Russian Hamlet  艾夫曼芭蕾：俄國哈姆雷特</title>
	<description><![CDATA[看了你所有的文章,覺得您應該認為自己是個高水準藝文鑑賞家,而且您也自認為所知道所了解的都是真正高檔的藝術.您相信您的鑑賞力,這一點讓我很欽佩,批判著一切,仿佛您就是所有藝文表演及文化中心的那個支撐點.這真的讓我感受到你的"大"與其他人的"小".

看著您居高臨下的"追尋本質之無窮形式的路程",我只能猜想您不是一位響叮噹的大學者,就是自認時不我與的窮酸書生.看完您的文章,真是受教良多,原來批判就是這麼簡單,看不起別人也是這麼容易,將對他人的不屑隱藏在文章中以彰顯自己的知識程度的確是我需要學習的,謝謝.至於所有藝術團體的付出,我想斗膽猜測您的想法,那就是只要您看的不滿意,他們存在的價值就可以被檢討.畢竟您不但花費時間還花費金錢在這些表演上,您說是嗎? ]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/848613.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/848613.html#comment-9220127</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:29:55 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：戀人‧戀語‧戀曲</title>
	<description><![CDATA[無奈抖世界  剩下你何我  難過ㄉ淚  為你留下淚算直得ㄉ  跟著你有點累!!
我好想好好抖抱住你抓住你抖心 好好抖愛你~~但一只有人要破壞我何你抖關ㄒ!!
我好然過~好無奈~好痛苦~抱想哭抖!!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116042.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116042.html#comment-9220111</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 22:56:58 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：波蘭音樂家蕭邦？</title>
	<description><![CDATA[It's wonderful to read someone's writings of art in such depth! Thank you so much for sharing!Chopin's soul leads me to play the piano...I used to play my trio arrangements with Tien-Sin, yes, she's just as what you described...I saw Tchaikovsky by Eifman Ballet in London 2 years ago... such strong images stays clearly in my mind... it's such a great surprise to read all these in your blog...I have my own Blog writing about my music, would love to invite you to visit it... http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/oceanpurple-music
warmth from Veronica]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/714053.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/714053.html#comment-9220123</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:28:21 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：豐滿的天心</title>
	<description><![CDATA[沒錯, 我就是看到標題才點進來的. 嘻.
寫得好, 加油.]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116023.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116023.html#comment-9220097</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:19:45 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：Tchaikovsky by Eifman Ballet    艾夫曼芭蕾：柴可夫斯基生死之謎</title>
	<description><![CDATA[Dear Howard,
You are very right about the comments. I felt rather dissapointed when viewing the recent work by Russian Ballet Theatre. Somehow the aesthetic level cannot be sustainded through the perfection of their techniques. It might be the loss of a great spirit, rather than the surfical fault of dancers performance.

From the conbination of the music in your description, somehow I wonder whether this is a work for people who love and have deep understanding of Tchaikovsky and the dance; or it is just a assembling piece to cater for general appeal?

love, chialing sis
(Brighton is wet, cold, and gray. The sea has lost its colour. Best scene for Chekov I am afarid...)   ]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/838486.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/838486.html#comment-9220125</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:16:41 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：再見天心！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[恩豪跟噹噹真有福氣，聽音樂會還能巧遇美女^_^
哪天我也要跟!!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/461950.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/461950.html#comment-9220117</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:18:18 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：蘇三管吃就好，懶得想太多：凱薩琳堡舞蹈劇場的『Lazy Susan』</title>
	<description><![CDATA[I am working right now, so i can only type English.
Nothing special, just want to say hi and good to see the words from you^-^
Also say hi to your her!!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/634927.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/634927.html#comment-9220121</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:39:54 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：鐘樓怪人才不是主角！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[喔耶！握個手！鐘樓怪人本來是個好故事的，被搞成這樣子的音樂劇，真是鳥爆了，不只故事爛，音樂特別爛。沒錯，故事舞蹈音樂裡就屬音樂最爛。跟故事毫無關聯，這算是哪門子音樂劇；作曲也爛，同樣的絃律重覆重覆再重覆，耳朵都快給聽爛了。開場的大教堂時代美其名叫氣勢恢宏，屁，不過就是一直搞上行音階，然後整部劇都後繼無力了。整部劇的音樂沒有主題沒有動機沒有發展，法國人還真有臉敢說這是「法國人的音樂劇」。還有，一樓的，這不光是在台灣演的，是偉大的法國人為了宣揚法國文化，在世界各國巡迴演出的，真不怕笑掉人大牙。]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116030.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/116030.html#comment-9220103</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:58:20 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：你聽到龜將軍會笑嗎？</title>
	<description><![CDATA[親愛的的朋友~~~~~~~平安

網路實在是浩瀚無邊
請您撥冗光臨由２位加起來超過１１０歲的LKK 所建置的Blog

前幾天在高雄　與摯友〔友情〕＆〔紅瓦厝〕的詞曲創作人與原唱者
－音樂家林文隆先生竟夜長談　我們對台灣音樂的熱情依然不減
然而　對於真正能夠立足永恆的創作與遠景　堪虞！堪悲！不勝感慨！

◆台灣樂府◆乘著台灣天籟の翅膀～～http://blog.roodo.com/mp3_taiwan/

友情の紅瓦厝－林文隆の音樂窟http://blog.roodo.com/friendship/

台灣樂府http://www.mp3-taiwan.com.tw/
林文隆音樂工作室http://linwenlong.com/index.htm

企盼　透過汝的人脈與鍵盤　大力的幫我們２位LKK 傳播
不論是Blog．伊媚兒．論壇．bbs站．留言版．．．．．
反正　只要可以曝光的地方　我們都很樂於獻醜

先向您道謝了！獻上祝福滿溢！

　　　　Ringo Lin 敬上　rocmusic@ms29.hinet.net]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/185316.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/185316.html#comment-9220115</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:39:51 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：你聽到龜將軍會笑嗎？</title>
	<description><![CDATA[他真是個很特別的人...]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/185316.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/enhao/archives/185316.html#comment-9220113</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:13:05 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>