<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>cstr-Legal Education</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/cat_286743.html</link>
<description>R&amp;B for the Taiwan Independence Movement</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/cat_286743.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>由蔡守訓的判決, 看要不要去念法律.</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			看到蔡守訓的判決, 決定要去念法律的人要有一個基本的認知.

追求正義, 第一個志願不是去念法律.

想有邏輯訓練, 也不用去念法律.

蔡守訓的判決, 沒有法律論證, 沒有證據引用.

就是一份寫爽的判決.

蔡守訓一個月十幾萬.

爽官.

馬英九說不定還會給他當高等法院法官.

辦公室可以配平面電視.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			看到蔡守訓的判決, 決定要去念法律的人要有一個基本的認知.<br />
<br />
追求正義, 第一個志願不是去念法律.<br />
<br />
想有邏輯訓練, 也不用去念法律.<br />
<br />
蔡守訓的判決, 沒有法律論證, 沒有證據引用.<br />
<br />
就是一份寫爽的判決.<br />
<br />
蔡守訓一個月十幾萬.<br />
<br />
爽官.<br />
<br />
馬英九說不定還會給他當高等法院法官.<br />
<br />
辦公室可以配平面電視.
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9952463.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9952463.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:08:03 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law (Pratzel) (01) </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law (Pratzel) (01) 

September 1, 2009 class assignment 

Welcome to Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law.  We will be using the Morgan and Rotunda textbook, "Professional Responsibility: Problems and Materials" and the associated supplement, "2009 Selected Standards on Professional Responsibility." 


		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law (Pratzel) (01) <br />
<br />
September 1, 2009 class assignment <br />
<br />
Welcome to Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law.  We will be using the Morgan and Rotunda textbook, "Professional Responsibility: Problems and Materials" and the associated supplement, "2009 Selected Standards on Professional Responsibility." <br />
<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9791521.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9791521.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9791521.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:23:13 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Booklist of Fall 2009</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			W74 LAW 530A 01S  Administrative Law (Levin)  C 3.0   

Course: W74 530A , Section 1
Instructor: Ronald Levin
-- STATE & FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (CASEBOOK), -- ASIMOW, "STATE & FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (CASEBOOK)" , WEST
 [Required]
-- ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCESS, -- GELLHORN, "ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCESS" , 5TH edition, WEST
 [Recommended]
      
W74 LAW 538D 01S  Corporations (Burson)  C 3.0              

Course: W74 538D , Section 1
Instructor: Charles Burson
-- BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (2009 STATUTES & RULES), -- KLEIN, "BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (2009 STATUTES & RULES)" , 2009 edition, FOUND
 [Required]
-- BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (CASEBOOK), -- KLEIN, "BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (CASEBOOK)" , 7TH edition, FOUND
 [Required]

W74 LAW 553B 01S  International Law (Sadat)  C 3.0 

Course: W74 553B , Section 1
Instructor: Leila Sadat
-- INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASEBOOK), -- JANIS, "INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASEBOOK)" , WEST
 [Required]
             
W74 LAW 562C 01S  Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law (Pratzel)  C 2.0

Course: W74 562C , Section 1
Instructor: Alan Pratzel
-- 2009 SELECTED STANDARDS ON PROF RESPONSIBILITY, -- MORGAN, "2009 SELECTED STANDARDS ON PROF RESPONSIBILITY" , 2009 edition, FOUND
 [Required]
-- PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (CASEBOOK), -- MORGAN, "PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (CASEBOOK)" , 10TH edition, WEST
 [Required]
              
W74 LAW 658Y 04S  Pretrial Practice & Procedure (Shields)  P 3.0

-- PRETRIAL (W/CD), -- MAUET, "PRETRIAL (W/CD)" , ASPEN
 [Required]              
           
W75 LAW 530B 01S  Intellectual Property Litigation (Warren/Wheelock/Upchurch)  C 3.0              

W75 LAW 604S 01S  Moot Court (Wiley Rutledge Moot Court Competition)  P 1.0              
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			W74 LAW 530A 01S  Administrative Law (Levin)  C 3.0   <br />
<br />
Course: W74 530A , Section 1<br />
Instructor: Ronald Levin<br />
-- STATE & FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (CASEBOOK), -- ASIMOW, "STATE & FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (CASEBOOK)" , WEST<br />
 [Required]<br />
-- ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCESS, -- GELLHORN, "ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCESS" , 5TH edition, WEST<br />
 [Recommended]<br />
      <br />
W74 LAW 538D 01S  Corporations (Burson)  C 3.0              <br />
<br />
Course: W74 538D , Section 1<br />
Instructor: Charles Burson<br />
-- BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (2009 STATUTES & RULES), -- KLEIN, "BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (2009 STATUTES & RULES)" , 2009 edition, FOUND<br />
 [Required]<br />
-- BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (CASEBOOK), -- KLEIN, "BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS (CASEBOOK)" , 7TH edition, FOUND<br />
 [Required]<br />
<br />
W74 LAW 553B 01S  International Law (Sadat)  C 3.0 <br />
<br />
Course: W74 553B , Section 1<br />
Instructor: Leila Sadat<br />
-- INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASEBOOK), -- JANIS, "INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASEBOOK)" , WEST<br />
 [Required]<br />
             <br />
W74 LAW 562C 01S  Ethics and Professionalism in the Practice of Law (Pratzel)  C 2.0<br />
<br />
Course: W74 562C , Section 1<br />
Instructor: Alan Pratzel<br />
-- 2009 SELECTED STANDARDS ON PROF RESPONSIBILITY, -- MORGAN, "2009 SELECTED STANDARDS ON PROF RESPONSIBILITY" , 2009 edition, FOUND<br />
 [Required]<br />
-- PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (CASEBOOK), -- MORGAN, "PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (CASEBOOK)" , 10TH edition, WEST<br />
 [Required]<br />
              <br />
W74 LAW 658Y 04S  Pretrial Practice & Procedure (Shields)  P 3.0<br />
<br />
-- PRETRIAL (W/CD), -- MAUET, "PRETRIAL (W/CD)" , ASPEN<br />
 [Required]              <br />
           <br />
W75 LAW 530B 01S  Intellectual Property Litigation (Warren/Wheelock/Upchurch)  C 3.0              <br />
<br />
W75 LAW 604S 01S  Moot Court (Wiley Rutledge Moot Court Competition)  P 1.0              
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9668177.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9668177.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:19:48 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>八月求職戰爭</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			八月求職戰爭展開

以州的專利核准量為搜尋主要依據
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			八月求職戰爭展開<br />
<br />
以州的專利核准量為搜尋主要依據
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9531319.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9531319.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:10:46 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Ph.D為專利人必要的學位</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			沒有Ph.D不代表你不能走專利這條路.

但有了Ph.D, 對專利事業的發展是有正面的效果.

Ph.D要不要去國外拿呢? 要的.

主要的原因是到一個英語環境去訓練自己的英語工程寫作能力.

台灣的工程教育缺乏寫作訓練.

大學的教育偏重計算和解題.

大學沒有教我們去表達和敘述工程問題.

因為缺乏寫作訓練, 台灣專利的內容通常缺乏邏輯性.

把請求項超到說明書內, 其是一個很偷懶的寫法.

寫到沒人看得懂. 這是一個不及格工程文件.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			沒有Ph.D不代表你不能走專利這條路.<br />
<br />
但有了Ph.D, 對專利事業的發展是有正面的效果.<br />
<br />
Ph.D要不要去國外拿呢? 要的.<br />
<br />
主要的原因是到一個英語環境去訓練自己的英語工程寫作能力.<br />
<br />
台灣的工程教育缺乏寫作訓練.<br />
<br />
大學的教育偏重計算和解題.<br />
<br />
大學沒有教我們去表達和敘述工程問題.<br />
<br />
因為缺乏寫作訓練, 台灣專利的內容通常缺乏邏輯性.<br />
<br />
把請求項超到說明書內, 其是一個很偷懶的寫法.<br />
<br />
寫到沒人看得懂. 這是一個不及格工程文件.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9424521.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9424521.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9424521.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:00:31 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>美國LLM和SJD(JSD)一覽表</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			http://www.abanet.org/legaled/postjdprograms/postjdc.html
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			http://www.abanet.org/legaled/postjdprograms/postjdc.html
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9282497.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/9282497.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:28:21 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>到美國念JD的現階段思考</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			要不要去美國念JD.

幾點思考因素:

1. 工作資歷
2. 學歷
3. 年紀
4. 生涯規劃
5. 經濟


		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			要不要去美國念JD.<br />
<br />
幾點思考因素:<br />
<br />
1. 工作資歷<br />
2. 學歷<br />
3. 年紀<br />
4. 生涯規劃<br />
5. 經濟<br />
<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/8507019.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/8507019.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/8507019.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:23:43 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>念LLM最重要還是英文</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			到美國念LLM, 最重要的還是英文.

來之前要把英文準備好.

儘管TOEFL高分, 但是要在美國進入狀況, 還是要吸收更多的英語.

Youtube, on-line newspapers都是不錯的管道.

如果你英文不好, 一到美國, 人家會把你看扁.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			到美國念LLM, 最重要的還是英文.<br />
<br />
來之前要把英文準備好.<br />
<br />
儘管TOEFL高分, 但是要在美國進入狀況, 還是要吸收更多的英語.<br />
<br />
Youtube, on-line newspapers都是不錯的管道.<br />
<br />
如果你英文不好, 一到美國, 人家會把你看扁.
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/8492007.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/8492007.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:58:43 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>美國聖路易華盛頓大學LLM學位線上說明會</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			美國聖路易華盛頓大學LLM學位線上說明會

主辦：Taiwan Law Society
時間：12月底
地點：網路直播

請恰：pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			美國聖路易華盛頓大學LLM學位線上說明會<br />
<br />
主辦：Taiwan Law Society<br />
時間：12月底<br />
地點：網路直播<br />
<br />
請恰：pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu<br />

		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7729381.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7729381.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:30:01 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>台派的你，不用考慮，來聖路易華盛頓大學唸書吧！</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			台派的你，還在猶豫要選美國哪一家學校嗎？來聖路易華盛頓大學吧，因為在這邊，我們有機會為台灣做點事。

華大每四年會舉辦美國總統或副總統的辯論會。在這樣的場合中，我們有機會為台灣發聲。相信你已經透過New York Times看到今年副總統辯論會的轉播。

我觀察的學校對於辯論會的佈置，想到一些可能的行動方式。事實上，我個人當天穿著「逆轉勝T-shirt」看看是否可以被媒體拍到。我不會再待四年，但是我的想法可以延續，等到四年後，看看有沒有機會做些事。

你如果工作久了，想換換環境，去考個TOEFL/GRE，來申請念華大的博士班。華大不收博士班的學費，反而給你錢花。很好吧！這邊住和吃都比較低消費。

如果你有興趣申請華大博士班，可聯絡我：pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu

華大風景：
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DF47CA7BF02193C9
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=827C652BB63C8074
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=C593B90D04C3F313
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			台派的你，還在猶豫要選美國哪一家學校嗎？來聖路易華盛頓大學吧，因為在這邊，我們有機會為台灣做點事。<br />
<br />
華大每四年會舉辦美國總統或副總統的辯論會。在這樣的場合中，我們有機會為台灣發聲。相信你已經透過New York Times看到今年副總統辯論會的轉播。<br />
<br />
我觀察的學校對於辯論會的佈置，想到一些可能的行動方式。事實上，我個人當天穿著「逆轉勝T-shirt」看看是否可以被媒體拍到。我不會再待四年，但是我的想法可以延續，等到四年後，看看有沒有機會做些事。<br />
<br />
你如果工作久了，想換換環境，去考個TOEFL/GRE，來申請念華大的博士班。華大不收博士班的學費，反而給你錢花。很好吧！這邊住和吃都比較低消費。<br />
<br />
如果你有興趣申請華大博士班，可聯絡我：pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu<br />
<br />
華大風景：<br />
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=DF47CA7BF02193C9<br />
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=827C652BB63C8074<br />
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=C593B90D04C3F313
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7438529.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7438529.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:47:28 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>來美國念JD卻目標中國就業市場的錯誤認知</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			如果你目標來美國念JD，心中卻想著自己可以進攻美國法律服務產業的中國業務市場，那你就大錯特錯了！

你知道有多少中國人來美國念JD嗎？光是Washington University in St. Louis School of Law的中國人JD就有快二十位，本校每年會產出只少五個中國人JD。但是全美產生的中國人JD不只來自本校。很多學校都有直接考LSAT去念JD的中國人。所以，你認為就算美國事務所要找人拓展中國市場，他們會聘你台灣人，還是只會考慮中國人。想想吧！

所以，還是看看自己如何用台灣來在美國找工作。台灣是美國IP法律服務業支撐之一，所以不用懷疑，IP是來美國念JD的唯一理由。台灣將是你找到工作的基礎！

如果你向成為美國IP律師，本校是你的唯一選擇。有興趣者，請聯絡pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu。
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			如果你目標來美國念JD，心中卻想著自己可以進攻美國法律服務產業的中國業務市場，那你就大錯特錯了！<br />
<br />
你知道有多少中國人來美國念JD嗎？光是Washington University in St. Louis School of Law的中國人JD就有快二十位，本校每年會產出只少五個中國人JD。但是全美產生的中國人JD不只來自本校。很多學校都有直接考LSAT去念JD的中國人。所以，你認為就算美國事務所要找人拓展中國市場，他們會聘你台灣人，還是只會考慮中國人。想想吧！<br />
<br />
所以，還是看看自己如何用台灣來在美國找工作。台灣是美國IP法律服務業支撐之一，所以不用懷疑，IP是來美國念JD的唯一理由。台灣將是你找到工作的基礎！<br />
<br />
如果你向成為美國IP律師，本校是你的唯一選擇。有興趣者，請聯絡pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu。
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7299299.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7299299.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 09:22:35 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Do not forget to apply for the Washington U in St. Louis School of Law.</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			If you happen to think of studying law in the United States, I encourage you to apply for the Washington U. in St. Louis School of Law.  And, if you are an IP professional, please consider our law school as your first choice for the advanced law degree.  We have a good procedure for LLMs to transfer to the JD program.  If you need more information, please contact me: pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu.  I hope the law professionals who have Taiwan indentity can come here.  And, we may have a chance to rock and roll Wash. U. Law.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			If you happen to think of studying law in the United States, I encourage you to apply for the Washington U. in St. Louis School of Law.  And, if you are an IP professional, please consider our law school as your first choice for the advanced law degree.  We have a good procedure for LLMs to transfer to the JD program.  If you need more information, please contact me: pchen@wulaw.wustl.edu.  I hope the law professionals who have Taiwan indentity can come here.  And, we may have a chance to rock and roll Wash. U. Law.
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7077913.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/7077913.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:51:39 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Playlist: How to Get to Washington U in St. Louis </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			如何去聖路易華盛頓大學（Washingfon University in St. Louis）


		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			如何去聖路易華盛頓大學（Washingfon University in St. Louis）<br />
<br />
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/AFA895389A11B2AE" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/p/AFA895389A11B2AE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6680341.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6680341.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:06:06 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>What is JD? What is JSD?</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			美國的法律專業學位基本上是設定為博士學位，其英文為「Juris Doctor」而簡稱為J.D.。法學院另外有提供學術研究為導向的博士學位，英文為「Juris Scientiae Doctoris」而簡稱為JSD。這二個學位的差異在於，前者有嚴格的修課標準，前者可讓你考美國所有州的律師，也是律師事務所會聘用你的條件。後者則是純學術研究，沒有修課義務，但必須要提出論文和通過口試才得以取得學位。

JD的起薪在比較好的事務所是每年16萬美金，中型事務所也有年薪12萬美金以上的收入。

JD和JSD原則上在台灣都是被承認的博士學位。不過如果要到學校任教，持JD者要再配上國內的LLM學位（例如我在政大法科所的學位）。這差異的來源是國內法律界認為讀JD並未在訓練研究和撰寫學術論文（當然，這不是事實。）。
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			美國的法律專業學位基本上是設定為博士學位，其英文為「Juris Doctor」而簡稱為J.D.。法學院另外有提供學術研究為導向的博士學位，英文為「Juris Scientiae Doctoris」而簡稱為JSD。這二個學位的差異在於，前者有嚴格的修課標準，前者可讓你考美國所有州的律師，也是律師事務所會聘用你的條件。後者則是純學術研究，沒有修課義務，但必須要提出論文和通過口試才得以取得學位。<br />
<br />
JD的起薪在比較好的事務所是每年16萬美金，中型事務所也有年薪12萬美金以上的收入。<br />
<br />
JD和JSD原則上在台灣都是被承認的博士學位。不過如果要到學校任教，持JD者要再配上國內的LLM學位（例如我在政大法科所的學位）。這差異的來源是國內法律界認為讀JD並未在訓練研究和撰寫學術論文（當然，這不是事實。）。
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6179679.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6179679.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:33:24 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Cardozo Cyberlaw Society: E-Discovering America, 1 of 7</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8GkmnMT20_A&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8GkmnMT20_A&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6166465.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6166465.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:51:23 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Participation in Washington U. in St. Louis School of Law</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Here are my suggestions about why you should participate in the law school activities.  Here is the student commons website, http://law.wustl.edu/student_commons/, where you can find relevant information about your law school life.   Here is the website, http://law.wustl.edu/students/index.asp?ID=1005, introducing student groups in the law school.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Here are my suggestions about why you should participate in the law school activities.  Here is the student commons website, http://law.wustl.edu/student_commons/, where you can find relevant information about your law school life.   Here is the website, http://law.wustl.edu/students/index.asp?ID=1005, introducing student groups in the law school.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6015247.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6015247.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/6015247.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:50:25 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Washington U. in St. Louis JSD application</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			If you come here for an LL.M. degree and later decide to go on for a JSD, you may start to write your proposal in the first semester.  The school only reviews your first semester GPA.   And if you find a supervisor, you are deemed to be admitted.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			If you come here for an LL.M. degree and later decide to go on for a JSD, you may start to write your proposal in the first semester.  The school only reviews your first semester GPA.   And if you find a supervisor, you are deemed to be admitted.
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5976733.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5976733.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:43:52 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>專利工程師的進修管道Washington U. in St. Louis School of Law</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			The LL.M. in Intellectual Property and Technology Law program at Washington University in St. Louis School Law is not only for the students who have a foreign law degree but also for the students who do not have a law degree but have an engineering or science degree with several years experiences in IP-related areas.

So, if you are a patent engineer and want to have an LL.M. degree, please contact me.  I can help you come to Washington U.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			The LL.M. in Intellectual Property and Technology Law program at Washington University in St. Louis School Law is not only for the students who have a foreign law degree but also for the students who do not have a law degree but have an engineering or science degree with several years experiences in IP-related areas.<br />
<br />
So, if you are a patent engineer and want to have an LL.M. degree, please contact me.  I can help you come to Washington U.
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5930307.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5930307.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:10:10 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Major and Minor in Law</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			First Tier: Patent Law
Second Tier: International IP Law
Third Tier: Copyright Law; Trademark Law; Trade Secret
Fourth Tier: Environmental Law
Fifth Tier: Anti-trust and Unfair Competition
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			First Tier: Patent Law<br />
Second Tier: International IP Law<br />
Third Tier: Copyright Law; Trademark Law; Trade Secret<br />
Fourth Tier: Environmental Law<br />
Fifth Tier: Anti-trust and Unfair Competition
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5891943.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5891943.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:13:10 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>打破馬英九綠卡失效的謊言的法學文獻</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			193 A.L.R. Fed. 673 (Originally published in 2004)American Law ReportsALR FederalThe ALR databases are made current by the weekly addition of relevant new cases.Abandonment of Lawful Permanent&ndash;Resident StatusDeborah F. Buckman, J.D....&sect; 2[a] Background, summary, and comment&mdash;GenerallyAn alien with permanent-resident status, also sometimes referred to as an &quot;LPR&quot; or &quot;green card holder,&quot; has been &quot;lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws.&quot;[FN1] This status may only be removed if an alien is determined to have committed a deportable offense[FN2] or an offense making him inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act,[FN3] or if the alien &quot;abandons&quot; his residence in the United States.An alien is, of course, not precluded from leaving the United States for short visits abroad. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that a resident alien who returns from being abroad may be readmitted for entry into the United States, at the Attorney General's discretion, without needing a passport, visa, reentry permit, or other special documentation, as would otherwise be required.[FN4] (筆者註：馬英九的綠卡有沒有效要看美國政府的裁量。)To qualify as a returning resident alien, an individual must have previously acquired lawful permanent-resident status, retained that status from the time it was acquired, and be returning to an unrelinquished lawful permanent residence after a &quot;temporary visit abroad.&quot;[FN5]If an alien has been abroad for a lengthy period of time, however, his commitment to permanently residing in the United States is called into question. Abandonment of permanent resident status is generally found when there has been a lengthy absence from the United States. Whether an alien has abandoned his status is a matter of subjective intention proven by objective facts, the ultimate issue being whether there is a continuing intent to return. Whether there was an intention to maintain permanent-resident status is not the issue, but rather whether there was a continuous, uninterrupted intention to return to the United States. (筆者註：馬英九主觀認為不是重點，還是要由法院判決他有沒有返回美國的意圖。)....
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<font size="4">193 A.L.R. Fed. 673 (Originally published in 2004)<br /><br />American Law Reports<br />ALR Federal<br />The ALR databases are made current by the weekly addition of relevant new cases.<br /><br /></font><br /><a name="Iadde4f603c9d11d991cebcdd0f810d83"></a><font size="4"><strong>Abandonment of Lawful Permanent&ndash;Resident Status<br /></strong><br /><br />Deborah F. Buckman, J.D.<br /><br />...<br /><br /></font><strong><font size="4">&sect; 2[a] Background, summary, and comment&mdash;Generally<br /><br /></font></strong><div style="text-indent: 0.25in"><font size="4">An alien with permanent-resident status, also sometimes referred to as an &quot;LPR&quot; or &quot;green card holder,&quot; has been &quot;lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws.&quot;[</font><a name="1Ic3925477a93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"></a><a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?service=Find&amp;rs=WLW8.03&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;mt=LawSchoolPractitioner&amp;n=1&amp;fn=_top&amp;sv=Split&amp;rlti=1&amp;cxt=DC&amp;rlt=CLID_FQRLT93421203&amp;ss=CNT&amp;scxt=WL&amp;vr=2.0&amp;rp=%2fFind%2fdefault.wl&amp;cite=193+a.l.r.+fed.+673#Ic3925477a93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"><font size="4" color="#376098">FN1</font></a><font size="4">] This status may only be removed if an alien is determined to have committed a deportable offense[</font><a name="2Ic3925478a93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"></a><a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?service=Find&amp;rs=WLW8.03&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;mt=LawSchoolPractitioner&amp;n=1&amp;fn=_top&amp;sv=Split&amp;rlti=1&amp;cxt=DC&amp;rlt=CLID_FQRLT93421203&amp;ss=CNT&amp;scxt=WL&amp;vr=2.0&amp;rp=%2fFind%2fdefault.wl&amp;cite=193+a.l.r.+fed.+673#Ic3925478a93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"><font size="4" color="#376098">FN2</font></a><font size="4">] or an offense making him inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act,[</font><a name="3Ic3925479a93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"></a><a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?service=Find&amp;rs=WLW8.03&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;mt=LawSchoolPractitioner&amp;n=1&amp;fn=_top&amp;sv=Split&amp;rlti=1&amp;cxt=DC&amp;rlt=CLID_FQRLT93421203&amp;ss=CNT&amp;scxt=WL&amp;vr=2.0&amp;rp=%2fFind%2fdefault.wl&amp;cite=193+a.l.r.+fed.+673#Ic3925479a93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"><font size="4" color="#376098">FN3</font></a><font size="4">] or if the alien &quot;abandons&quot; his residence in the United States.<br /><br /></font></div><div style="text-indent: 0.25in"><font size="4">An alien is, of course, not precluded from leaving the United States for short visits abroad. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that a resident alien who returns from being abroad may be readmitted for entry into the United States, <font color="#ff0000"><strong>at the Attorney General's discretion</strong></font>, without needing a passport, visa, reentry permit, or other special documentation, as would otherwise be required.[</font><a name="4Ic392547aa93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"></a><a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?service=Find&amp;rs=WLW8.03&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;mt=LawSchoolPractitioner&amp;n=1&amp;fn=_top&amp;sv=Split&amp;rlti=1&amp;cxt=DC&amp;rlt=CLID_FQRLT93421203&amp;ss=CNT&amp;scxt=WL&amp;vr=2.0&amp;rp=%2fFind%2fdefault.wl&amp;cite=193+a.l.r.+fed.+673#Ic392547aa93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"><font size="4" color="#376098">FN4</font></a><font size="4">] <strong><font color="#ff0000">(筆者註：馬英九的綠卡有沒有效要看美國政府的裁量。)<br /><br /></font></strong></font></div><div style="text-indent: 0.25in"><font size="4">To qualify as a returning resident alien, an individual must have previously acquired lawful permanent-resident status, retained that status from the time it was acquired, and be returning to an unrelinquished lawful permanent residence after a &quot;temporary visit abroad.&quot;[</font><a name="5Ic392547ba93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"></a><a href="http://web2.westlaw.com/result/documenttext.aspx?service=Find&amp;rs=WLW8.03&amp;cnt=DOC&amp;mt=LawSchoolPractitioner&amp;n=1&amp;fn=_top&amp;sv=Split&amp;rlti=1&amp;cxt=DC&amp;rlt=CLID_FQRLT93421203&amp;ss=CNT&amp;scxt=WL&amp;vr=2.0&amp;rp=%2fFind%2fdefault.wl&amp;cite=193+a.l.r.+fed.+673#Ic392547ba93511dc9ef6e6f359b87f02"><font size="4" color="#376098">FN5</font></a><font size="4">]<br /><br /></font></div><div style="text-indent: 0.25in"><font size="4">If an alien has been abroad for a lengthy period of time, however, his commitment to permanently residing in the United States is called into question. Abandonment of permanent resident status is generally found when there has been a lengthy absence from the United States. Whether an alien has abandoned his status is a matter of subjective intention proven by objective facts, the ultimate issue being whether there is a continuing intent to return. <font color="#ff0000"><strong>Whether there was an intention to maintain permanent-resident status is not the issue</strong></font>, but <font color="#0000ff"><strong>rather whether there was a continuous, uninterrupted intention to return to the United States. <font color="#ff0000">(筆者註：馬英九主觀認為不是重點，還是要由法院判決他有沒有返回美國的意圖。)<br /><br />....</font></strong></font></font></div>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5732377.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5732377.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:02:51 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>支持馬英九綠卡有效的美國法院判決Chavez-Ramirez v. I.N.S., 792 F.2d 932, 936-37 (9th Cir. 1986) </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Chavez-Ramirez v. I.N.S., 792 F.2d 932, 936-37 (9th Cir. 1986)

We have previously recognized the widely disparate views of what constitutes a “temporary visit abroad.” See Tejeda v. INS, 346 F.2d 389, 393 n. 3 (9th Cir.1965). And we have cited with approval at least the portion of the Second Circuit's test in United States ex rel. Lesto v. Day that classifies a visit as temporary so long as it is “for a period relatively short, fixed by some early event.” See Alvarez v. District Director of United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 539 F.2d 1220, 1224-25 (9th Cir.1976); Gamero v. INS, 367 F.2d 123, 126 (9th Cir.1966). We now turn to consider the question of whether a visit can be classified as temporary when, as in United States ex rel. Polymeris v. Trudell, the visit is not fixed by some early event but turns on an event with a reasonable possibility of occurring within a short period of time.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Chavez-Ramirez v. I.N.S., 792 F.2d 932, 936-37 (9th Cir. 1986)<br />
<br />
We have previously recognized the widely disparate views of what constitutes a “temporary visit abroad.” See Tejeda v. INS, 346 F.2d 389, 393 n. 3 (9th Cir.1965). And we have cited with approval at least the portion of the Second Circuit's test in United States ex rel. Lesto v. Day that classifies a visit as temporary so long as it is “for a period relatively short, fixed by some early event.” See Alvarez v. District Director of United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 539 F.2d 1220, 1224-25 (9th Cir.1976); Gamero v. INS, 367 F.2d 123, 126 (9th Cir.1966). <u>We now turn to consider the question of whether a visit can be classified as temporary when, as in United States ex rel. Polymeris v. Trudell, the visit is not fixed by some early event but turns on an event with a reasonable possibility of occurring within a short period of time.</u>
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5620919.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5620919.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5620919.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:38:02 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>民事訴訟法要怎麼開課？</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			民事訴訟法：講授民事訴訟法及法院相關規定。

訴訟準備：講授如何和客戶溝通，如何調查事實。

訴訟文書撰寫：講授如何撰寫起訴書，答辯書。

民事訴訟實務：講授如何在法庭上辯論，及各項訴訟攻防技巧。

最高法院上訴實務：講授如何向最高法院提出上訴。
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			民事訴訟法：講授民事訴訟法及法院相關規定。<br />
<br />
訴訟準備：講授如何和客戶溝通，如何調查事實。<br />
<br />
訴訟文書撰寫：講授如何撰寫起訴書，答辯書。<br />
<br />
民事訴訟實務：講授如何在法庭上辯論，及各項訴訟攻防技巧。<br />
<br />
最高法院上訴實務：講授如何向最高法院提出上訴。
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5533477.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5533477.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:11:01 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Toward to passing the bar exam.</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			How do I begin my formal legal career?  It is a difficult question.  Should I continue the patent law practice or prepare for being a litigant?
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			How do I begin my formal legal career?  It is a difficult question.  Should I continue the patent law practice or prepare for being a litigant?
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5522731.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5522731.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5522731.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:49:30 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Memo 1: Concerns regarading Marbury v. Madison (1803) </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			To: President Thomas Jefferson
From: White House Counsel
Re: Concerns regarading Marbury v. Madison (1803)                                    

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			To: President Thomas Jefferson<br />
From: White House Counsel<br />
Re: Concerns regarading Marbury v. Madison (1803)                                    <br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5160965.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5160965.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/5160965.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:00:34 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>JD plus East Asian Studies</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			JD plus East Asian Studies
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<a href="http://artsci.wustl.edu/GSAS/Academics/departments/EastAsian.pdf">JD plus East Asian Studies</a>
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4996459.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4996459.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4996459.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:10:55 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Spring 2008 Wash U Law LLM cirriculum</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Civil Procedure (Syverud)  C 4.0              
Patent Drafting (Warren/Wheelock)  C 3.0              
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Civil Procedure (Syverud)  C 4.0              <br />
Patent Drafting (Warren/Wheelock)  C 3.0              
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4994555.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4994555.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4994555.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:51:42 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Contracts Grade of LL.M. Students at Wash U in Kieff Class</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Night persons: 89 (CN1), 89 (TW1), 81 (TW2), 79 (BZ), Pass (TW3).
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Night persons: 89 (CN1), 89 (TW1), 81 (TW2), 79 (BZ), Pass (TW3).
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4782771.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4782771.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:45:03 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Preparation Plan of the Taiwan Patent Attorney Bar Exam</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Jan: Patent Law and Regulations Review plus Calculus
Feb: Administrative Procedure Law and Administrative Appeal Law Review plus Physical Chemistry

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Jan: Patent Law and Regulations Review plus Calculus<br />
Feb: Administrative Procedure Law and Administrative Appeal Law Review plus Physical Chemistry<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4782109.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4782109.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4782109.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:56:03 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>SOCIAL SCIENCES CITATION INDEX - LAW</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			SOCIAL SCIENCES CITATION INDEX - LAW 
JOURNAL LIST 
Total journals: 105 
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			SOCIAL SCIENCES CITATION INDEX - LAW <br />
JOURNAL LIST <br />
Total journals: 105 
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4742487.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4742487.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4742487.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:41:42 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Office Memorandum-Problem II</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: Prof. 
From: Student 
Date: November 21, 2007
Re: Ms. Maxine Hunt’s adverse possession issue
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			OFFICE MEMORANDUM<br />
To: Prof. <br />
From: Student <br />
Date: November 21, 2007<br />
Re: Ms. Maxine Hunt’s adverse possession issue
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4523727.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4523727.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4523727.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:46:23 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Three Sorts of Contract Law</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			1. Contracts Law in Reality
2. Contrracts Law in Bar Exams
3. Contracts Law in Law Schools
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			1. Contracts Law in Reality<br />
2. Contrracts Law in Bar Exams<br />
3. Contracts Law in Law Schools
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4469031.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4469031.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:55:28 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Washington State Legal  System- 01</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			1. Supreme Court

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/court_dir/orgs/112.html">1. Supreme Court</a><br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4457765.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4457765.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4457765.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:25:06 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Trademark Practice Assignment VI</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Written Assignment VI
To: The Best Lawn Care Company
From:
Date: October 29, 2007
Re: Risk Assessment of the OMS Investments, Inc. Issue

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Written Assignment VI<br />
To: The Best Lawn Care Company<br />
From:<br />
Date: October 29, 2007<br />
Re: Risk Assessment of the OMS Investments, Inc. Issue<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4394839.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4394839.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4394839.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:13:42 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>How to learn Contracts Law</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Since the contracts law is state common law.  Generally, we do not need to expect to learn the real rules in the class.  What we need to focus is the issues.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Since the contracts law is state common law.  Generally, we do not need to expect to learn the real rules in the class.  What we need to focus is the issues.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4390083.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4390083.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4390083.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:58:39 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Trademark Practice Assignment V- Notice of Opposition</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Written Assignment V

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Written Assignment V<br />
<br />
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE<br />
<br />
BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4343409.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4343409.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4343409.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:39:29 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Teaching TW Law: Three branches or five branches of the Government</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Teaching TW Law: Three branches or five branches of the Government
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Teaching TW Law: Three branches or five branches of the Government
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4306951.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4306951.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4306951.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:51:37 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Trademark Practice Assignment IV</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Applicant: Home Shopping Club LP

Serial No.: 75/789,860

Filed: September 1, 2007

Mark: STRETCH FX
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Applicant: Home Shopping Club LP<br />
<br />
Serial No.: 75/789,860<br />
<br />
Filed: September 1, 2007<br />
<br />
Mark: STRETCH FX
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4284215.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4284215.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4284215.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:32:13 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>The most important you need to know when you want to apply for Washington U School of Law</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			When you apply for an LL.M. program of the Washington U. School of Law, do not forget to request the tuition waiver.  The range is between 4700 USD to 9400 USD.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			When you apply for an LL.M. program of the Washington U. School of Law, do not forget to request the tuition waiver.  The range is between 4700 USD to 9400 USD.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4270849.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4270849.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4270849.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:45:17 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Missouri&#039;s Nonprofit Corporation Law </title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Nonprofit Corporation Law
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<a href="http://www.moga.mo.gov/STATUTES/C355.HTM">Nonprofit Corporation Law</a>
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4225643.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4225643.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4225643.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:21:27 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Core Distinctives of the U.S. Legal System and Comparison with the Taiwan Legal System</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			I. Introduction

In this article, I will address two core distinctives mentioned in the class.  One is “The Common Law Affects Federal Statutory Law,” and the other is “Code-based Law-In Cases Applying and Interpreting the Code-decisively Influences Interpretation of the Federal Code.”  Before that, I will first explain a general idea about the Taiwan legal system, which is related to those two distinctives.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			I. Introduction<br />
<br />
In this article, I will address two core distinctives mentioned in the class.  One is “The Common Law Affects Federal Statutory Law,” and the other is “Code-based Law-In Cases Applying and Interpreting the Code-decisively Influences Interpretation of the Federal Code.”  Before that, I will first explain a general idea about the Taiwan legal system, which is related to those two distinctives.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4218589.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4218589.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4218589.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:05:08 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>HW-Products Liability Law in New York</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Products Liability Law in New York

Products liability law in New York began by the contracts disputes where what sellers sold were not what the buyers expected. It was a concern about a promise to give a defect-free product.  In Seixas v. Woods, 2 Cai. R. 48 (1804), the court held that a product seller was not liable to the defects of the product if the seller did not know the defects and expressly warrant the product.  
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Products Liability Law in New York<br />
<br />
Products liability law in New York began by the contracts disputes where what sellers sold were not what the buyers expected. It was a concern about a promise to give a defect-free product.  In Seixas v. Woods, 2 Cai. R. 48 (1804), the court held that a product seller was not liable to the defects of the product if the seller did not know the defects and expressly warrant the product.  
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4189875.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4189875.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4189875.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:02:46 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Contracts I</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Contracts I
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<a href="http://www.stclpad.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=106&Itemid=155#_Toc143439103">Contracts I</a>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4102081.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4102081.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:49:50 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Kirksey v. Kirksey</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Kirksey v. Kirksey
Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845
8 Ala. 131

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Kirksey v. Kirksey<br />
Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845<br />
8 Ala. 131<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4033359.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4033359.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4033359.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:55:01 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Bolin Farms v. American Cotton Shippers Association</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Bolin Farms v. American Cotton Shippers Association
U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana, 1974
370 F.Supp. 1353
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Bolin Farms v. American Cotton Shippers Association<br />
U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana, 1974<br />
370 F.Supp. 1353
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4031443.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4031443.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4031443.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:19:28 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Case Brief: Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald
Supreme Court of the United States, 2006
126 S.Ct. 1246, 163 L.Ed.2d 1069

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald<br />
Supreme Court of the United States, 2006<br />
126 S.Ct. 1246, 163 L.Ed.2d 1069<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4026573.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4026573.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4026573.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:39:00 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Bailey v. West</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Bailey v. West
Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1969
105 R.I. 61, 249 A.2d. 414
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Bailey v. West<br />
Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1969<br />
105 R.I. 61, 249 A.2d. 414
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4008133.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4008133.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/4008133.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 10:12:12 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>政大法科所的準備要領</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			沒有任何要領。

不放心的話，就去行天宮拜拜。
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			沒有任何要領。<br />
<br />
不放心的話，就去行天宮拜拜。
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3967883.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3967883.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:59:17 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Fall 2007 Courses Book List</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			1. Contracts-Scott Kieff

-- Murphy, Spedidel and Ayres, "Studies in Contract Law" , 6th edition, Foundation Press [Required]
-- Burton and Eisenberg, "Contract Law: Selected Source Materials" , 2007 edition, West [Required]
-- Chirelstein, "Concepts and Case Analysis in Law of Contracts" , 5th, Foundation Press edition [Recommended]

		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			1. Contracts-Scott Kieff<br />
<br />
-- Murphy, Spedidel and Ayres, "Studies in Contract Law" , 6th edition, Foundation Press [Required]<br />
-- Burton and Eisenberg, "Contract Law: Selected Source Materials" , 2007 edition, West [Required]<br />
-- Chirelstein, "Concepts and Case Analysis in Law of Contracts" , 5th, Foundation Press edition [Recommended]<br />

		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3768661.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3768661.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3768661.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:48:51 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Housing in St. Louis</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			http://stlouis.craigslist.org/apa/
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<a href="http://stlouis.craigslist.org/apa/">http://stlouis.craigslist.org/apa/</a>
		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3718875.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3718875.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:29:18 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>LLM Orientation</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Dear LLMs Class of '08:

We are very much looking forward to your arrival in St. Louis.  Orientation begins Monday, August 20th at the Office of International Students and Scholars (OISS) and August 21st in the School of Law.  Attached is a draft Orientation schedule.  LLMs in U.S. Law will register for classes on the first day of orientation.  Enjoy the remainder of your summer!


		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			Dear LLMs Class of '08:<br />
<br />
We are very much looking forward to your arrival in St. Louis.  Orientation begins Monday, August 20th at the Office of International Students and Scholars (OISS) and August 21st in the School of Law.  Attached is a draft Orientation schedule.  LLMs in U.S. Law will register for classes on the first day of orientation.  Enjoy the remainder of your summer!<br />
<br />

		
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3709139.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/cstr/archives/3709139.html</guid>
	<category>Legal Education</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:57:00 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>