<< Written Description: Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991) | 回blog首頁 | Definiteness: Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Mfg., Inc., 73 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1996) >>

September 9,2007

Written Description: Fujikawa v. Wattanasin, 93 F.3d 1559 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

6. Fujikawa v. Wattanasin, 93 F.3d 1559 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

The “written description” is a question of fact.

Simple describing a large genus of compounds is not sufficient to satisfy the written description requirement as to particular species or sub-genuses.

Posted by babyface0 at 樂多Roodo! │22:24 │回應(0) │引用(0) │Patent Law
樂多分類：新聞評論 共同主題：智慧財產權的世界 工具：編輯本文
Ads by Roodo! 

引用URL

http://cgi.blog.roodo.com/trackback/4112213
  


回最上方