cstr : 2008-03 月份簡文

2008-03 月份文章　顯示方式：簡文 | 列表

March 31,2008

小心！中國文化入侵台灣！

台灣南投的廈門衛視節目(http://vivataiwantv.blogspot.com/2008/03/blog-post_30.html)

Posted by babyface0 at 0:19 │回應(0) │引用(0) │Diary

March 30,2008

台灣師大附中校歌逆轉版

附中　附中　我們的搖籃
漫天烽火　創建在台灣
玉山給我們靈秀雄奇
東海使我們闊大開展
我們來自四方　融匯了各地的優點
我們親愛精誠師生結成了一片
砥礪學行　鍛鍊體魄
我們是新[台灣」的中堅
看我們附中培育的英才
肩負起時代的重擔
附中青年　決不怕艱難
[心愛台灣]　相期在明天
把附中精神　照耀祖國的錦繡河山

http://www.hs.ntnu.edu.tw/2003web/

Posted by babyface0 at 11:35 │回應(27) │引用(0) │Diary

March 29,2008

專利工程師的生涯發展01

公司內專利工程師-->學士後法律學士或碩士-->公司內法務兼專利工程師-->公司內法務主管

Posted by babyface0 at 21:06 │回應(0) │引用(0) │Patent Law

March 27,2008

20050820 馬英九發飆

...繼續閱讀

Posted by babyface0 at 4:09 │回應(2) │引用(0) │Diary

March 25,2008

[Channel 4 News] Biggest Tibet protests in 20 years

大選後，我們還是應該關心圖博的狀況，抗議中國對圖博人進行屠殺！

[Channel 4 News] Biggest Tibet protests in 20 years

Posted by babyface0 at 23:56 │回應(2) │引用(0) │Diary

March 24,2008

看到一篇文章：http://blog.roodo.com/xmac1023/archives/5744965.html

還是忍不住要談綠卡的事。

只是看不慣馬英九認為沒有人讀過美國法律。

最沒有爭議的是馬英九到AIT宣示放棄綠卡。

綠卡有沒有效不在於馬英九主觀的認知，必須由當馬英九持綠卡進入美國時，美國政府要不要接受他入境為準。就算美國政府認為他綠卡無效，馬英九也有權力進行行政訴訟確認他的綠卡有效性。

目前，還沒有一件法院判決可以支持馬英九持有綠卡的事實可以構成綠卡的無效。

Posted by babyface0 at 7:08 │回應(0) │引用(0) │Diary

March 23,2008

Mary J. Blige feat. Ne-Yo - "Do You (Remix)"

Mary J. Blige feat. Ne-Yo - "Do You (Remix)" ...繼續閱讀

Posted by babyface0 at 20:48 │回應(0) │引用(0) │R&B Music Station

March 22,2008

台灣還有五百萬人

註記號次姓名得票數得票率% 推薦政黨
◎ 2 馬英九、蕭萬長 7,658,724 58.45 中國國民黨
1 謝長廷、蘇貞昌 5,445,239 41.55 民主進步黨
http://vote2008-3.nat.gov.tw/zh-tw/T1/s00000000000.html

Posted by babyface0 at 19:58 │回應(2) │引用(0) │Diary

張清芳的歌迷，請站出來支持一號謝長廷！台灣加油！

Posted by babyface0 at 11:06 │回應(0) │引用(0) │Diary

March 21,2008

打破馬英九綠卡失效的謊言的法學文獻

193 A.L.R. Fed. 673 (Originally published in 2004)

American Law Reports
ALR Federal
The ALR databases are made current by the weekly addition of relevant new cases.

Abandonment of Lawful Permanent–Resident Status

Deborah F. Buckman, J.D.

...

§ 2[a] Background, summary, and comment—Generally

An alien with permanent-resident status, also sometimes referred to as an "LPR" or "green card holder," has been "lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws."[FN1] This status may only be removed if an alien is determined to have committed a deportable offense[FN2] or an offense making him inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act,[FN3] or if the alien "abandons" his residence in the United States.

An alien is, of course, not precluded from leaving the United States for short visits abroad. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides that a resident alien who returns from being abroad may be readmitted for entry into the United States, at the Attorney General's discretion, without needing a passport, visa, reentry permit, or other special documentation, as would otherwise be required.[FN4] (筆者註：馬英九的綠卡有沒有效要看美國政府的裁量。)

To qualify as a returning resident alien, an individual must have previously acquired lawful permanent-resident status, retained that status from the time it was acquired, and be returning to an unrelinquished lawful permanent residence after a "temporary visit abroad."[FN5]

If an alien has been abroad for a lengthy period of time, however, his commitment to permanently residing in the United States is called into question. Abandonment of permanent resident status is generally found when there has been a lengthy absence from the United States. Whether an alien has abandoned his status is a matter of subjective intention proven by objective facts, the ultimate issue being whether there is a continuing intent to return. Whether there was an intention to maintain permanent-resident status is not the issue, but rather whether there was a continuous, uninterrupted intention to return to the United States. (筆者註：馬英九主觀認為不是重點，還是要由法院判決他有沒有返回美國的意圖。)

....

Posted by babyface0 at 11:02 │回應(3) │引用(0) │Legal Education

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [最終頁]

回頁首▲

cstr