September 30,2007
September 25,2007
HW-Products Liability Law in New York
Products Liability Law in New York
Products liability law in New York began by the contracts disputes where what sellers sold were not what the buyers expected. It was a concern about a promise to give a defect-free product. In Seixas v. Woods, 2 Cai. R. 48 (1804), the court held that a product seller was not liable to the defects of the product if the seller did not know the defects and expressly warrant the product. ...繼續閱讀
Products liability law in New York began by the contracts disputes where what sellers sold were not what the buyers expected. It was a concern about a promise to give a defect-free product. In Seixas v. Woods, 2 Cai. R. 48 (1804), the court held that a product seller was not liable to the defects of the product if the seller did not know the defects and expressly warrant the product. ...繼續閱讀
September 23,2007
Ph.D in Political Science plus JD
James Spriggs, professor at WU.
The thesis title: "How the Policy Reasons Effects the Court Decisions in Patent Law Cases- Comparative Studies between Supreme Court and CAFC".
The thesis title: "How the Policy Reasons Effects the Court Decisions in Patent Law Cases- Comparative Studies between Supreme Court and CAFC".
September 21,2007
JSD path 01
What is my JSD topic?
"The Taiwan Patent Evolution-How the US Patent Law Triggers It" or
"The Impact of the US Patent Law on the Development of Taiwan Patent Law".
"The Taiwan Patent Evolution-How the US Patent Law Triggers It" or
"The Impact of the US Patent Law on the Development of Taiwan Patent Law".
September 18,2007
September 17,2007
September 15,2007
HW for Trademark Practice-1-1
Written Assignment I - Advice for Question 1
Dear Client,
Your new shape for a packaging peanut should deserve the protection of intellectual property rights. The packaging shape may be protected by either a trademark or a design patent. And the protective scopes of these two rights are different. Concerning the term of protection, the trademark will be effective forever as long as you keep using it in commerce, while a design patent only has a fourteen-year term for the date it was granted. Concerning infringement, a potential infringer may get out off a suit by providing a different trademark causing no confusion, mistake or deception of your trademark, while a patent has stronger protection because the difference between an accused product and your patent may not let the accused product leave the boundary of the patent scope. ...繼續閱讀
Dear Client,
Your new shape for a packaging peanut should deserve the protection of intellectual property rights. The packaging shape may be protected by either a trademark or a design patent. And the protective scopes of these two rights are different. Concerning the term of protection, the trademark will be effective forever as long as you keep using it in commerce, while a design patent only has a fourteen-year term for the date it was granted. Concerning infringement, a potential infringer may get out off a suit by providing a different trademark causing no confusion, mistake or deception of your trademark, while a patent has stronger protection because the difference between an accused product and your patent may not let the accused product leave the boundary of the patent scope. ...繼續閱讀
September 14,2007
What is "trivia hat"?
One JD student told me that "It is just an expression, like "put on your thinking cap". I meant to bring your ideas and be ready to write good trivia questions."
The American culture is hard to understand.
The American culture is hard to understand.
