August 20,2005
生不逢國?

而美國作曲家Kyle Gann在他的blog裡又約略的提出一種,他是這麼敘述他的經驗
It was, of course, the piano piece Für Alina, published by Universal and recorded on ECM. It’s a lovely piece, or, one might say, a potentially lovely piece: there’s not much about the notation that would constrain one to play it with the devotional calm that makes it soulful. You kind of have to know Pärt’s reputation as a “Holy Minimalist” in order to know what atmosphere to play it with; the notation doesn’t tell you much, which is a bad thing if you’re a Downtown composer, but apparently fine if you’re Estonian. [中略] Lots of American composers have written music this simple, even this spiritual in intent: Peter Garland, Beth Anderson, Elodie Lauten, Mary Jane Leach, Daniel Goode, Jim Fox, William Duckworth, myself. But of course, we’re not Estonian, we don’t have reputations as Holy Men, and so our scores, neither published by Universal nor recorded on ECM, are neglected and ignored as the overly simple, notationally incomplete, amateurish screeds that they apparently must be. |
引用URL
對我來說,Peter Garland 遠比 Arvo Pärt 悅耳多了。

赫然發現自己幾年前亂入的留言還在,有點不好意思哪。
今天是想來請教 cloning 對 The Rest Is Noise 這本書的看法。最近打算入手,但想買的東西太多,能支配的時間太少啊。
個人是覺得Ross說故事的能力極其利害.整本書完全沒用到譜例來解釋,但是又能把他切割的各個章節的氛圍做適切的表達.搭配他網站上提供的音樂檔,可以讓人邊看邊聽.這本書我個人認為很有看的趣味,倒不是說一口氣看完那種爽快,也不是那種看New Direction in Music的戰戰兢兢,是那種每天翻個十來頁,邊聽他提供的音樂的書.
當然這本書也是有點缺點,像電子音樂部分就少了一點,對非傳統歐陸一系/美東一系(應該說是美學院沿習正統一系會比較好,Ross他跟Kyle Gann交情不錯,所以對Gann提出的'Downtown composers'一說有比較多關懷.這部分個人是覺得有點過量,不過並不影響書的整體性.
我是之前跟朋友一起網購的時候買的,也是擱了好一陣子才拿出來看.看到現在出平裝本了,都還沒看完,時間真是大敵啊!

是的,在下正是看到平奘本才決定出手。
感謝,我這就乖乖拿書結帳去(淚)。

有心得的話可以分享一下喔