顆粒亂記

＊趕流行的政治運動

在這民意高漲的速食亂象中，頂著民主口號的言論自由，可比脫韁的青春論
調，而居中扮演仲介角色的傳播媒體，如往常般不意外的大放厥詞，周遭Ｘ
扁字眼，就像今年最IN流行風般，各家媒體為了收視率、獨家，無不卯足全
力兜湊一連串混亂的環節，日以繼夜全程轉撥，還唯恐天下不亂地炒作二分
法對立的陳腔濫調。

＊Who can tell the truth?

當我看到電視上，倒扁單位因為不能順利地「全台開花」，
就把矛頭指向"民進黨執政縣市拒絕倒扁群眾入境“

身為台南人的我聽到這種說辭，真覺得丟臉又很難過。當過台南立委的施先
生難道不知道台南路很小條耶？要從哪塞進四百多人的遊覽車加上一百多輛
隨隊的私家車？怎麼看都覺得這個政治舞台秀擴大的愈來愈理所當然？這是
權利？還是民意？

而真正的民意，其實一點都不如媒體所言！請看下面連結影片（轉貼自魚腸劍譜）
這才是真正老百姓的心聲！

詳文請見 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/yufulin&article_id=4483036



＊權利？民意？利益？

從我有記憶以來，每次選舉總是會收到一堆貪污噁爛的廣告文宣，到底誰又
能分辨出事實的真相？某種程度上來說，政客和黑道的關係並沒有理想化的
遙遠，只要沒被抓到貪污把柄，還是可以跟大家坐在同一陣線上大聲反貪污
，不是嗎？

在爭取罷免權利的同時，憲法體制的問題浮出台面，而當初制定這個高門檻
關卡的人，和現在螢光幕前叫囂的政客脫離不了關係吧？！有段非常貼切的
形容可以運用在此時：

　這社會是有規則存在的，人必須活在規則下，
　但是所謂的規則，通常都是些「聰明人」所訂定的，
　而這些聰明人為方便自己，則會巧妙的隱藏對自己不利的部份。

那麼，如果是為了人民權利和憲法體制的問題，為什麼到後來又被導向族群
對立、政治權謀....還衍生出中國人和台灣人的鬼問題！無數的問題接著無數
的困惑，就像雪球般愈滾愈大，到底有誰搞清楚重點在哪了？

是不是等一切成了歷史，才是問題？

最後擷取電影Good night,and good luck!，Murrow最後所說的金玉良言啊！　　　　　

I began by saying that our history will be what we make it. If we go on as we are then history will take its revenge, and retribution will not limp in catching up with us. Just once in a while, let us exalt the importance of ideas and information. Let us dream to the extent of saying that on a given Sunday night the time normally occupied by Ed Sullivan is given over to a clinical survey on the state of American education. And a week or two later, the time normally used by Steve Allen is devoted to a thorough-going study of American policy in the Middle East. Would the corporate image of their respective sponsors be damaged? Would the shareholders rise up in their wrath and complain? Would anything happen other than a few million people would have received a little illumination on subjects that may well determine the future of this country and therefore the future of the corporations? To those who say, “People wouldn’t look, they wouldn’t be interested. They’re too complacent, indifferent and insulated” I can only reply: There is, in one reporter’s opinion, considerable evidence against that contention. But even if they are right, what have they got to lose? Because if they are right and this instrument is good for nothing but to entertain, amuse and insulate then the tube is flickering now and we will soon see that the whole struggle is lost. This instrument can teach, it can illuminate, and yes it can inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends. Otherwise it is nothing but wires and lights in a box. There is a great and perhaps decisive battle to be fought against ignorance, intolerance and indifference. This weapon of television could be useful. Good night, and good luck！

顆粒說：對Good Night, and Good Luck有興趣的人，可參考以下資料
Good Night, and Good Luck by George Clooney〔From音速青春〕
晚安，祝好運〔From聞.見.思.錄〕