http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-17475023 文章回應 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:14:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-17474757 文章回應 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:25:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-17101927 文章回應 Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:34:27 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-17100471 hcchang35@hotmail.com(HCC) 文章回應 Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:22:50 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-17038129 文章回應 Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:02:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-17027935 hcchang35@hotmail.com(HCC) 文章回應 Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:26:37 +0800 http://groups.msn.com/REPUBLICOFTAIWAN/ 1 民進黨是故意輸掉選舉的 !! 2 國民黨的大醜聞 釣魚台黑白鬧 !! 3 進步文明專欄 馬英九會哭著回家找媽媽 日本人只要拿出過去1970 年以前, 顧面統版的地理課本, 馬英九就會哭著回家找媽媽 !! 就算真的有一天馬英九真的去國際法庭, 日本人只要拿出過去1970 年以前, 顧面統版的地理課本, 馬英九就會哭著回家找媽媽 !! 韓國當年和日本恢復邦交前, 曾經抓進入爭議領海的日本漁民. 為何兩國的中國人根本不敢佔領釣魚台 ? 也不敢抓日本漁民 ? 看清楚 !! 講釣魚台日本兮是 台奸 蔣介石以及蔣經國 !! http://groups.msn.com/REPUBLICOFTAIWAN/ http://groups.msn.com/REPUBLICOFTAIWAN/]]> http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16853059 文章回應 Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:38:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16479929 文章回應 Thu, 22 May 2008 02:15:32 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16475981 文章回應 Wed, 21 May 2008 15:31:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16462859 文章回應 Mon, 19 May 2008 22:58:27 +0800 http://blog.kaishao.idv.tw/?p=1123 縱然馬的曾深入分析了解，但我認為馬的依然與老國民黨一樣看不起「台灣人悲情」。 郝柏村李煥許歷農等人一樣看不起「台灣人悲情」，但他們沒有深入研究何謂「台灣人悲情」，所以才會被運用「台灣人悲情」的李登輝所殲滅。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16456799 文章回應 Mon, 19 May 2008 00:10:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16395719 文章回應 Sun, 11 May 2008 02:43:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16390573 文章回應 Sat, 10 May 2008 06:39:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16279259 文章回應 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:27:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16278949 文章回應 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:44:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16273741 文章回應 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:38:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16273067 文章回應 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:43:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16237263 文章回應 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:51:45 +0800 http://groups.msn.com/REPUBLICOFTAIWAN/ 從李登輝選後對馬英九的發言, 可以看出來民進黨是故意輸掉選舉的. 阿扁年初立委選前被鄭弘宜訪問講 : 照顧弱勢永遠作不完. 如果現在農漁工每個月可以領一萬三, 他這樣講就沒錯. 連泰國前總理 戴克辛都知道怎麼照顧農民. 民進黨明明 ( 執政 ) 有問題, 新潮流卻想先改革 ( 立委 ) 初選制度. 民進黨如果不照顧弱勢, 只會學新潮流講的廢除排藍民調, 必死! 阿扁照顧外X 軍公教八年的結果就是落選. 民進黨就算是贊成統一, 眷村的票一樣不會選你! 大家不必難過, 但是要有最壞的準備. 民進黨敗選的真正原因 !! 為何 ( 馬上 ) 一定不好 ? 為何 FREDDY 和金美齡都錯了 ? 我是不樂觀的, 光是中正紀念堂回來就會造成多大的衝突 ? 不合作運動. http://groups.msn.com/REPUBLICOFTAIWAN/]]> http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16220151 文章回應 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:37:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16217197 文章回應 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:04:04 +0800 http://blog.pixnet.net/Richter/post/16444289 他那裏也呈現城市並非變色的重要點，特別是紅衫軍聚集的台北市。紅衫軍若有影響，對非都市的影響大於都市，若都市中產階級和DPP形成對立，那對非都市、非中產階級與DPP，所形成的對立更可觀。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16217125 文章回應 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:16:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16217091 文章回應 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:06:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16205235 文章回應 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:32:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16203641 文章回應 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 03:29:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16202849 文章回應 Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:31:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16202499 文章回應 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:46:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16198959 文章回應 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:16:08 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16190455 文章回應 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:54:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16187925 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:24:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16187399 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:40:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16187263 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:10:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16187209 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:00:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16187045 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:23:02 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16185155 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:41:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16185035 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:21:18 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16185007 tangtang@ctci.com.tw(插嘴王) 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:13:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16184463 kuochou.huang@msa.hinet.net(不食周粟) 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:19:15 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16184337 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:54:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/abzoo01]]> http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html http://blog.roodo.com/chita/archives/5834199.html#comment-16184077 文章回應 Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:10:55 +0800