<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>雞鴨狗狒聊地理-讀書筆記</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/cat_28596.html</link>
<description>修改集遊惡法，警政署長與國安局長下台，總統與行政院長道歉！</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/cat_28596.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>Some random thoughts on Anna Tsing&#039;s &quot;Friction&quot; (by 痞子揚)</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			Even though it took several times of reading until I finally found myself got a sense about Tsing&rsquo;s project, I did enjoy very much the way in which she patches those seemingly unrelated events, conversations and texts together to makes sense an ethnography of global connection. This is an ethnography about, if I am not taking her wrongly, how the universals are taken by the locals, and how this process has made Indonesian environmental politics contingent and unpredictable. Or maybe it is inappropriate to even try to give the book a line of summary, since the book is more about making fun of theorists of globalization and those of the environment, than developing an central argument. So in Chapter 2 we find two digrams that are supposed to be &quot;both serious and a joke,&quot; and between Chapter 4 and 5 a list of a thousand species jumps out on the margin of the pages, making readers' brains strained. At one moment you hear she complaining about her mom, and at the next you start to wonder maybe you still love snakes.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/405051669_123fa34557_m.jpg" alt="" hspace="5" align="right" />Even though it took several times of reading until I finally found myself got a sense about Tsing&rsquo;s project, I did enjoy very much the way in which she patches those seemingly unrelated events, conversations and texts together to makes sense an ethnography of global connection. This is an ethnography about, if I am not taking her wrongly, how the universals are taken by the locals, and how this process has made Indonesian environmental politics contingent and unpredictable. Or maybe it is inappropriate to even try to give the book a line of summary, since the book is more about making fun of theorists of globalization and those of the environment, than developing an central argument. So in Chapter 2 we find two digrams that are supposed to be &quot;both serious and a joke,&quot; and between Chapter 4 and 5 a list of a thousand species jumps out on the margin of the pages, making readers' brains strained. At one moment you hear she complaining about her mom, and at the next you start to wonder maybe you still love snakes.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/2780581.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/2780581.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/2780581.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 05:42:53 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>輕鬆聊書─Qing Colonial Enterprise (by 肉圓邑)</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			輕鬆聊書─Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China by 肉圓邑  Laura Hostetler寫的「Qing Colonial Enterprise」，一本主要討論清帝國如何透過製圖（cartography）與民族誌（ethnography）做為帝國擴張後掌控領土的工具。Hostetler把焦點放在十七世紀到十九世紀初的大清國，從康熙皇帝一直到乾隆皇帝，是正值大清東征西討轉戰南北大拓版圖之際；所以咧，清廷就一路打江山也一路畫江山，還兼作各族的田野調查，然後把自己風風光光地打造成當時世界的大帝國之一，北京城那時堪稱與倫敦和聖彼得堡並列為帝國中心啊！Hostetler大書特書地比較了清帝國與同時期歐洲的地圖和民族誌，無不就是想要告訴讀者，清廷在製圖與民族誌的伎倆與技術上跟歐洲的帝國們壓根沒啥兩樣，當然這可能有爭議，不過且先聽聽Hostetler怎麼說。 
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<div class="pict"><img class="pict" src="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/a71e754c.jpg" border="0" alt="0226354202.jpg" hspace="5" width="150" height="215" align="left" /></div>輕鬆聊書─Qing Colonial Enterprise: Ethnography and Cartography in Early Modern China by 肉圓邑  Laura Hostetler寫的「Qing Colonial Enterprise」，一本主要討論清帝國如何透過製圖（cartography）與民族誌（ethnography）做為帝國擴張後掌控領土的工具。Hostetler把焦點放在十七世紀到十九世紀初的大清國，從康熙皇帝一直到乾隆皇帝，是正值大清東征西討轉戰南北大拓版圖之際；所以咧，清廷就一路打江山也一路畫江山，還兼作各族的田野調查，然後把自己風風光光地打造成當時世界的大帝國之一，北京城那時堪稱與倫敦和聖彼得堡並列為帝國中心啊！Hostetler大書特書地比較了清帝國與同時期歐洲的地圖和民族誌，無不就是想要告訴讀者，清廷在製圖與民族誌的伎倆與技術上跟歐洲的帝國們壓根沒啥兩樣，當然這可能有爭議，不過且先聽聽Hostetler怎麼說。 
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/1422891.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/1422891.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/1422891.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 12:48:18 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>邑寶寶交作業</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			自從痞子揚PO了一篇英文的心得報告之後，邑寶寶壓力甚大，醞釀許久，終於也孵出一篇英文版讀書心得。不同於痞子揚專論傅柯，邑寶寶嘗試應用傅柯governmentality的觀念，結合之前雜七雜八念的文章，還有一些感興趣的議題，胡謅一下自己的研究關懷...
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			自從痞子揚PO了一篇英文的心得報告之後，邑寶寶壓力甚大，醞釀許久，終於也孵出一篇英文版讀書心得。不同於痞子揚專論傅柯，邑寶寶嘗試應用傅柯governmentality的觀念，結合之前雜七雜八念的文章，還有一些感興趣的議題，胡謅一下自己的研究關懷...
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/603148.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/603148.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/603148.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:38:04 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Society Must be Defended/ Foucault (下)</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			 Foucault 在台灣是夠火紅的了，我覺得實在是沒有必要再交代這個法國光頭是誰。不過，這本書倒是要交代一下。

Foucault 最紅的書大概有三本: Discipline and Punish, The History of Sexuality, Madness and Civilization。NS這個人夠怪，硬是挑了這一本沒有人聽過的 Society Must be Defended。

Society Must be Defended是Foucault 1976年的時候在法藍西學院的講座內容。編這本書的人很骨意，硬是找到當時有去聽講作的人的錄音帶，然後一個字一個字把他打成文字搞，很猛。
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<img src="http://static.flickr.com/30/50431536_245397fea1_o.jpg" hspace="5"   align="left"> Foucault 在台灣是夠火紅的了，我覺得實在是沒有必要再交代這個法國光頭是誰。不過，這本書倒是要交代一下。<br />
<br />
Foucault 最紅的書大概有三本: Discipline and Punish, The History of Sexuality, Madness and Civilization。NS這個人夠怪，硬是挑了這一本沒有人聽過的 Society Must be Defended。<br />
<br />
Society Must be Defended是Foucault 1976年的時候在法藍西學院的講座內容。編這本書的人很骨意，硬是找到當時有去聽講作的人的錄音帶，然後一個字一個字把他打成文字搞，很猛。
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/571354.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/571354.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/571354.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 16:19:21 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Society Must be Defended/ Foucault (上)</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			這一篇是最近交出去的一個兩頁的摘要。把牠放在這裡充當讀書筆記; 要不然痞子揚原本號稱要在這個部落格放筆記的，結果一篇也沒有，覺得自己也實在是太厚顏無恥了。

課名叫作 Nature and Culture: Social Theory, Social Practice, and the Environment。姑且稱那個老師NS好了。

我想很多人都已經知道的，痞子揚我來到柏克萊以後，挫折感遠遠大於成就感。這學期上了三個課，每一門課每一個禮拜至少一本書，其中還有兩門課每一個禮拜都要交一份兩頁的報告; 那一門不用交報告的課是我advisor的課，一點也不敢放鬆。我也不知道我到底夠不夠努力，我只知道昨天照鏡子的時候，左邊鬢角發現一根白髮; 下次去買啤酒的時候，如果我用我的左臉頰對著店員，他應該是不會再要求我拿出ID了吧。
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			<img src="http://static.flickr.com/30/50525824_9dac9b02a9_m.jpg" hspace="5"   align="right">這一篇是最近交出去的一個兩頁的摘要。把牠放在這裡充當讀書筆記; 要不然痞子揚原本號稱要在這個部落格放筆記的，結果一篇也沒有，覺得自己也實在是太厚顏無恥了。<br />
<br />
課名叫作 Nature and Culture: Social Theory, Social Practice, and the Environment。姑且稱那個老師NS好了。<br />
<br />
我想很多人都已經知道的，痞子揚我來到柏克萊以後，挫折感遠遠大於成就感。這學期上了三個課，每一門課每一個禮拜至少一本書，其中還有兩門課每一個禮拜都要交一份兩頁的報告; 那一門不用交報告的課是我advisor的課，一點也不敢放鬆。我也不知道我到底夠不夠努力，我只知道昨天照鏡子的時候，左邊鬢角發現一根白髮; 下次去買啤酒的時候，如果我用我的左臉頰對著店員，他應該是不會再要求我拿出ID了吧。
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/571233.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/571233.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/571233.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 15:32:58 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>上海租界時期中產階級城郊宅地的社會生產--第一部分:摘要</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			2005/6/1

上海租界時期中產階級城郊宅地的社會生產
The Social Production of Suburban Dwelling in Colonial Shanghai

郭奇正/ Kuo, Chi-Jeng (東海大學建築系副教授)

地理學報 第三十五期: 53-80 (2004)
Journal of Geographical Science (35) 53-80 (2004)

URL: http://www.geog.ntu.edu.tw/journal/ (pdf檔)

個人書目分類: 

East Asia Urban Geography and History/ Settlements and Colonization

關鍵字:

社會生產 (Social Production), 國家干預 (State Intervention), 社會區辨 (Social Differentiation), 上海里弄住宅 (Alleyway Housing), 上海的租界時期 (Colonial Shanghai).
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			2005/6/1<br />
<br />
上海租界時期中產階級城郊宅地的社會生產<br />
The Social Production of Suburban Dwelling in Colonial Shanghai<br />
<br />
<a href="http://arch.thu.edu.tw/html/intro/teacherdata/chi-jeng/chi-jeng1.htm" target="_blank">郭奇正/ Kuo, Chi-Jeng</a> (東海大學建築系副教授)<br />
<br />
地理學報 第三十五期: 53-80 (2004)<br />
Journal of Geographical Science (35) 53-80 (2004)<br />
<br />
URL: http://www.geog.ntu.edu.tw/journal/ (pdf檔)<br />
<br />
個人書目分類: <br />
<br />
East Asia Urban Geography and History/ Settlements and Colonization<br />
<br />
關鍵字:<br />
<br />
社會生產 (Social Production), 國家干預 (State Intervention), 社會區辨 (Social Differentiation), 上海里弄住宅 (Alleyway Housing), 上海的租界時期 (Colonial Shanghai).
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/162730.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/162730.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/162730.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:30:33 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>為什麼要讓讀書筆記上線 (by 痞子揚)</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
			這個部落格裡,很大一部份將會是我的讀書筆記.

讀書筆記大家都知道的嘛: 唸書,作摘要,寫心得; 沒有太多的撇步,細心,勤快加自律是也. 不過,把讀書筆記內容赤裸裸地開放在公眾場域裡,似乎不是件多有意義的事. 在城鄉所畢老師的新書"教授為什麼沒有告訴我"裡面, 他就認為研究者在處理文獻時,不可以只是將自己的讀書筆記胡亂拼湊,而必須將文獻脈絡化,並提出批判性的回顧(critical review) (2005: 15-18, 33-46). 否則,研究論文(作為一種公共場域)裡的文獻回顧,就會墮落成偽裝的注解書目(disguised annotated bibliography), 或者,講得更酸一點,家具拍賣型錄(furniture sale catalogue)(36).

這個部落格裡,會有我雜亂無章,品質不一的讀書筆記.這些筆記的集合,將型塑這個公共場域成為一種annotated bibliography. 沒錯,是痞子揚胡亂拼湊的家具型錄,文體紛雜,觀點混亂,脈絡模糊.
		]]>
	</description>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[
			這個部落格裡,很大一部份將會是我的讀書筆記.<br />
<br />
讀書筆記大家都知道的嘛: 唸書,作摘要,寫心得; 沒有太多的撇步,細心,勤快加自律是也. 不過,把讀書筆記內容赤裸裸地開放在公眾場域裡,似乎不是件多有意義的事. 在城鄉所畢老師的新書"教授為什麼沒有告訴我"裡面, 他就認為研究者在處理文獻時,不可以只是將自己的讀書筆記胡亂拼湊,而必須將文獻脈絡化,並提出批判性的回顧(critical review) (2005: 15-18, 33-46). 否則,研究論文(作為一種公共場域)裡的文獻回顧,就會墮落成偽裝的注解書目(disguised annotated bibliography), 或者,講得更酸一點,家具拍賣型錄(furniture sale catalogue)(36).<br />
<br />
這個部落格裡,會有我雜亂無章,品質不一的讀書筆記.這些筆記的集合,將型塑這個公共場域成為一種annotated bibliography. 沒錯,是痞子揚胡亂拼湊的家具型錄,文體紛雜,觀點混亂,脈絡模糊.
		<a class="acontinues" href="http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/146799.html">(繼續閱讀...)</a>
		]]>
	</content:encoded>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/146799.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/btippie/archives/146799.html</guid>
	<category>讀書筆記</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 12:00:26 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>