http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-10085087 文章回應 Tue, 01 May 2007 18:18:52 +0800 >我贊同原地垂直抬高保留的條件是，機廠的屋頂必須夠大且完整涵蓋樂生原有院區。 === XD！]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-10062609 文章回應 Tue, 01 May 2007 11:14:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-10053285 文章回應 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:11:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-10046899 文章回應 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:37:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/weichen/archives/2904811.html#comment-10011747 樂生文膽來囉～！！ 偶也有機會去挖水門案ㄛ XDXD]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-10043343 文章回應 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:44:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-10013377 文章回應 Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:19:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9975041 文章回應 Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:08:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9941913 文章回應 Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:00:41 +0800 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/seafra001&article_id=18090560 漢堡兄 看到我朋友的文想到獻堡 很適合你的漢堡XD]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9937287 文章回應 Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:50:57 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9918631 文章回應 Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:04:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9912709 文章回應 Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:27:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9899649 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:41:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9896015 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:58:23 +0800 >被最會胡鬧的人說　不要嬉閙，真是情何以堪吶～ +∞]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9885735 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:21:16 +0800 > 大家不要嬉鬧 被最會胡鬧的人說　不要嬉閙，真是情何以堪吶～]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9885505 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:46:23 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9877265 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:06:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9871831 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:21:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9870135 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:32:44 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9863949 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:51:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9858575 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:24:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9858511 ahfanlin@gmail.com(昆蟲) 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:02:47 +0800 >或是遷到東岸 促進後山發展 正殼！ 東部的山水美景、氣候溫度正是養老的桃花源 雖然交通略嫌不便 這正好可以與拼捷運、求生存的粗鄙捷運派、機車派做一區隔]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856851 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:36:22 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856783 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:09:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856701 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:45:38 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856645 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:18:31 +0800 >直接把樂生遷到已經稍掉的草山行館位址，好像是個不錯的選擇，環境佳，對於受療養者而言，應該不錯 我反對 陽明山的觀光資源已經太多 交通已經飽和 不差一個樂生古蹟 應該要考慮往南遷 平衡南北差距 或是遷到東岸 促進後山發展]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856629 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:13:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856625 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:11:53 +0800 >還要高鐵設站在每一個行館旁 方便遊寶島啦 ::既然樂生派拒絕異地重建的方式，為了尊重他們，其實可以考慮把台灣其他地方的古蹟啦、遊樂園啦、風景區啦有的沒的，全部異地重建到這些院民居住的行館旁邊。這才是最方便的啦～]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856615 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:08:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9856533 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:58:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9854625 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:24:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852701 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:12:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852687 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:09:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852683 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:08:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852649 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:04:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852631 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:01:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852629 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:01:20 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852623 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:00:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852621 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:59:55 +0800 >我同意樂生應該有國家古蹟的地位。 搶頭香，來吐槽 我甚至同意樂生列入世界文化遺產 但是，這些都有審查程序 不是說了算的東西 不然咧，大家都堅持自己是十大傑出青年 那名額就不夠啦]]> http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html http://blog.roodo.com/bigburger/archives/3074403.html#comment-9852615 文章回應 Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:58:08 +0800