http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10889741 文章回應 Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:44:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10885135 ether@universe.com(ether) 文章回應 Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:16:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/kaihuang/archives/1488987.html ether, I was very efficient because I wasn't drunk during the first 4 innings, then I slowed down because of the beer! XD (I actually mentioned about the beer in one of the posts.)]]> http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10881769 文章回應 Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:42:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10881665 baldwinkwok@hotmail.com(baldwinkwok) 文章回應 Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:51:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10881603 baldwinkwok@hotmail.com(baldwinkwok) 文章回應 Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:35:41 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10875945 文章回應 Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:44:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10864147 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:19:51 +0800 http://npb.club.tw/viewtopic.php?t=22326 「瓦倫泰的人材活用術」去台灣各書店找，沒有擺在架上，訂就有了。我是透過金石堂訂的。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10862149 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:31:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10858589 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:26:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10858483 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:59:38 +0800 >沒親身打過棒球的 >>佔大多數球迷 所以 >>太專業的講法本來就不該出現 走的路比吃的米多嗎？什麼時代了，還以為有親身體驗是絕對高上嗎？台灣多少總教練會用Gameday Pitching f/x 或是引用rotational batting 來分析投打？ 球迷有沒有打球和評球根本是兩碼子事。事實上球評是一種和打球完全不同的專業，聽了一堆大聯盟退休的球員或GM 在電視上講來講去，真正會評球，講得出內容或者說表達能力好的，手指頭都數的出來。 另外，建議您念念那本關於Bobby Valentine 的「瓦倫泰的人材活用術」，看看二十一世紀棒球的趨勢。數據分析以及物理學是現代棒球很重要的一部分。這些不是土法煉鋼打球打的出來的。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10856843 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 04:21:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10856029 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:51:33 +0800 > 瘦橘子開竅了喔~~ 前陣子看你的文章.發覺你總是圍繞在球種、或是LOCATION、MOVEMENT....等等來做主題. 其實那些對於一個文字工作者並不重要的. 重要的是對於一場比賽關鍵點的觀察.以及其所延伸出來對於面的一番詮釋.]]> http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10855963 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:32:20 +0800 > 瘦橘子開竅了喔~~ 前陣子看你的文章.發覺你總是圍繞在球種、或是LOCATION、MOVEMENT....等等來做主題. 其實那些對於一個文字工作者並不重要的. 重要的是對於一場比賽關鍵點所延伸出來對於面的詮釋]]> http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10855943 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:29:53 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10855855 文章回應 Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:13:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/3438627.html#comment-10851235 文章回應 Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:02:47 +0800