http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html/ zh-tw Roodo Blog System All Rights Reserved http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824047 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:54:43 +0800 邱毓斌兄的這一篇傳給他看。 「國民黨在背後支持？嘿，搞清楚，這幾年的社會運動中， 唯一曾在老K中央黨部前狠狠靜坐幾天幾夜的，就是樂生自救會跟青年樂生聯盟了。」]]> http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824045 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:31:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824043 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:00:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824041 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:57:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824039 torrent.org@gmail.com(Torrent) 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:52:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824037 maurice.hu@msa.hinet.net(Theodor) 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 05:50:31 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824035 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:08:29 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824033 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:28:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824031 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:40:09 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824029 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:37:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824027 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:28:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824025 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:04:12 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824023 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:57:21 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824021 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:54:40 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824019 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:54:26 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824017 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:43:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824015 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:14:45 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824013 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:12:06 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824011 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:07:25 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824009 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:40:43 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824007 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:08:00 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824005 文章回應 Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:01:59 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824003 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:34:42 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5824001 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:23:28 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823999 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:48:03 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823997 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:50:30 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823995 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:40:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823993 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:27:37 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823991 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:21:38 +0800 http://www.news98.com.tw/dispbbs.asp?boardID=9&RootID=1377510&ID=1377510]]> http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823989 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:37:34 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823987 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:31:10 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823985 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:42:58 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823983 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:30:54 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823981 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:33:14 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823979 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:50:11 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823977 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:25:49 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823975 maurice.hu@msa.hinet.net(Theodor) 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:09:18 +0800 這篇 因為之前發現這篇跟樂青黃詠光的那篇〈 從頭說起蘇院長的五點謊言〉諸多雷同，還跟Torrent問了一下。 如果是借用樂青的文章來質疑蘇院長，那當然再好不過，真想在現場啊～！]]> http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823973 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:43:55 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823971 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:12:51 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823969 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:39:56 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823967 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:56:47 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823965 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:50:33 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823963 ancorena@mail2000.com.tw(瓦礫) 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:45:48 +0800 http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823961 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:09:17 +0800 http://nooorman.blogspot.com/2007/03/blog-post_15.html 這是一篇挑戰文，重點在於25公尺軌道無法縮減成5公尺，原因是台北市捷運局的原始車廂設計，無法做到這樣的縮減，的確會有翻車的危險。 如果國際上有案例，或是高雄捷運可以採行該標準，可能是因為他們的原始車廂設計本來就是為這樣的標準而做，但是台北捷運不是。 此外，噪音問題也會很嚴重。]]> http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html http://blog.roodo.com/anarch/archives/2854933.html#comment-5823959 文章回應 Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:20:44 +0800