August 3,2005

全球化與中國勞工

剛剛看到一本新書訊。作者是密西根大學政治系的年輕教授。他在2002年曾經發表過與本書論旨相關的論文於政治學期刊World Politics上。這本書看來有趣,但不知寫的如何。


Contagious Capitalism:
Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China
Mary Elizabeth Gallagher


One of the core assumptions of recent American foreign policy is that China's post-1978 policy of "reform and openness" will lead to political liberalization. This book challenges that assumption and the general relationship between economic liberalization and democratization. Moreover, it analyzes the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) liberalization on Chinese labor politics.

Market reforms and increased integration with the global economy have brought about unprecedented economic growth and social change in China during the last quarter of a century. Contagious Capitalism contends that FDI liberalization played three roles in the process of China's reforms. First, it placed competitive pressure on the state sector to produce more efficiently, thus necessitating new labor practices. Second, it allowed difficult and politically sensitive labor reforms to be extended to other parts of the economy. Third, it caused a reformulation of one of the key ideological debates of reforming socialism: the relative importance of public industry. China's growing integration with the global economy through FDI led to a new focus of debate--away from the public vs. private industry dichotomy and toward a nationalist concern for the fate of Chinese industry.

In comparing China with other Eastern European and Asian economies, two important considerations come into play, the book argues: China's pattern of ownership diversification and China's mode of integration into the global economy. This book relates these two factors to the success of economic change without political liberalization and addresses the way FDI liberalization has affected relations between workers and the ruling Communist Party. Its conclusion: reform and openness in this context resulted in a strengthened Chinese state, a weakened civil society (especially labor), and a delay in political liberalization.

Mary Elizabeth Gallagher is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She is also a faculty associate of the Center for Chinese Studies and the Institute for Labor and Industrial Relations.


Posted by soundfury at 樂多Roodo! │11:31 │回應(4)引用(0)中國政經
樂多分類:文字創作 工具:編輯本文
Ads by Roodo! 

引用URL

http://cgi.blog.roodo.com/trackback/333788
回應文章
conclusion: reform and openness in this context resulted in a strengthened Chinese state, a weakened civil society (especially labor), and a delay in political liberalization...
==

一般認為,改革開放後的中國開始「國家」轉型,而非片面的更強大;市民社會幾乎是從無到有,無論城鄉皆然;政治自由化也是從零開始。因此這個作者的觀察「結論」與一般感受落差確實很大。這作者真是太有新意,我得再琢磨琢磨。
Posted by 沙包 at August 3,2005 13:53
順便試試看引用功能,希望順利。
Posted by 沙包 at August 3,2005 13:56
YS Wu的說法是 六四前的民主文化與民主需求 被經濟發展口號和實際成果優先壓下來 不過這有可能是引鴆止渴 等到經濟發展達到3000USD 民主化的要求 就壓不住了

see:

Wu, Yu-Shan. 2002. “Economic Development and Political Stability underAuthoritarian Regime: China in the 1990’s.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Political Reforms of Mainland China in a Changing
Global Society, National Taiwan University, Taipei, April 25-27.
Posted by Kornai at August 4,2005 21:05
有人曾經對吳的那個研究提出商榷。見:
包淳亮,威權體制下的經濟發展與政治穩定—從吳玉山的綜合模型出發,東亞研究,第33卷第3期,2002年7月出版,頁43~50

一句話:如果經濟的起落可以影響政治民主化的起落,那麼這個起落就會成為週期性的。
Posted by 沙包 at August 4,2005 23:02