<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>８手亂談</title>
<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands</link>
<description><![CDATA[樂多跟蕃薯藤分家，結果我們的banner不見了>-]]>
	</description>
<language>zh-tw</language>
<generator>Roodo Blog System</generator>
<copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/recent-comment.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>回應：權力伴隨著責任 - Viva LP!</title>
	<description><![CDATA[想不到這次八八水災，第一個展現出 LP，"負起政務官的責任" 而下台的，竟然是外交部夏立言。我並不認為每次有事官員就該下台，那也太瞎了，就事論事，這次的事情確實外交部應該要給一個交代，但是負責的該不該是夏，是另一個問題。不過，看看夏，再看看其他更該負責、理由卻很多的官員，真的對台灣的文官體制感到很不恥。當官都很會，但是做事能力參差不齊，而且沒有政務官的自覺，責任來了都如出一轍地推託卸責。夏立言果然是目前唯一有 LP 的官!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/9760951.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/9760951.html#comment-19692371</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:24:05 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：權力伴隨著責任 - Viva LP!</title>
	<description><![CDATA[現在的官員,從總統開始,大家都是怪別人做不好,怪媒體亂報,自己都沒有錯!!我們有這種領導人,真的是..............]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/9760951.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/9760951.html#comment-19678551</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:43:58 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：躲在窗簾後偷偷報警 -by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[親愛的小河馬
很高興看到你最後報警了
做人不該鄉愿
否則受害的是自己以及無辜的他人

年紀輕輕就從事犯罪
如果不在從事小惡的時候就交由司法矯正
長大之後豈不是越來越大尾
希望那個竊賊已經得到應得的司法對待（他一定會再犯的）
不處罰壞人，就是對好人的懲罰
法治社會與人治社會不同
法治社會制定的法律是政府與公民打的契約
這個契約是最低的行為標準也是最低的保護
違反最低行為標準的人當然要接受制裁（因為你危害到其他遵守契約的公民的最低保護）
人治社會講的是道德以及人情
因此會出現假藉高道德之名進行沒有準則的司法報復，也會出現法律動不了權貴階級的不公平現象

這是你2005年的目擊
希望你的生活中不要再遭遇這類恐怖的事情
祝福大家都平安]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/567915.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/567915.html#comment-19096631</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:04:55 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：換發美國駕照</title>
	<description><![CDATA[這真是很讚的資訊呢！我們這裡DMV雖然還可以，不過每次去等待時間超久，照相真的很像自己是罪犯，連面容怪異的照片都無法討價還價。不過，因為不景氣的關係，我們這裡的AAA好像撤走了（？）...]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/8146329.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/8146329.html#comment-18869665</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:15:25 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：歐巴馬就職典禮的程序疑問</title>
	<description><![CDATA[謝謝解說! :)! 不過大概是為了不讓程序有瑕疵，也為杜絕眾口云云，所以歐巴馬和首席大法官今天會面，又重新宣誓了一次。]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/8145105.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/8145105.html#comment-18421255</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:23:37 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：歐巴馬就職典禮的程序疑問</title>
	<description><![CDATA[因為 Obama 的 oath 有錯 ( Roberts 唸錯了), 所以正好有人討論到這個問題, 結論好像是, 其實 oath 只是典禮一個形式, 有沒有 oath 不會影響他們當不當總統副總統, 其實在當天 12:00 起他就是總統了, 所以當 Obama 唸 oath 時他己經當四分鐘的總統囉, 也就是, 在同時間 Bush 的 administration 正式結束了. 因此, 若是 Obama 在宣誓前被暗殺, Biden 還是一樣第一順位成為總統, 不會有 Bush-Biden 的結合 (這兩個人結合還真蠻難想像的)]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/8145105.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/8145105.html#comment-18420521</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:09:34 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：研究生的禮物</title>
	<description><![CDATA[你是指某俠欲買某無用至極之嬰兒禮物一事吧? 同感。
是說，某俠早已將那把劍賣掉囉...]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/6575977.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/6575977.html#comment-17277869</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:35:10 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：研究生的禮物</title>
	<description><![CDATA[嗯，回到這裡看到我的上一篇留言，我覺得我的直覺about[
我心目中最難跟嬰兒聯想在一起的人]好準喔！哈哈哈！]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/6575977.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/6575977.html#comment-17249175</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:48:45 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：研究生的禮物</title>
	<description><![CDATA[首先，看到小河馬對八手亂彈的涓涓灌溉，真是讓我覺得我們其他六隻手真是殘廢到哪國去了（漸漸相信沒廢的可能只有嘴巴，所以不適合當blogger?）...好啦，我只是暫時休假（而且受到警告暫時自我禁錮中）...
不知道為何，看到你說的毫無 sense 男，我第一個想到的就是高大俠耶（原來在我心目中最難跟嬰兒聯想在一起的人是他...!喔，請別問我在興奮什麼勁...)
雖然我懷著麥小鴨，你這篇倒是提出我也沒想過的實際問題。但我也覺得，不用辦啥baby shower,要送新手父母最實惠的就是這些東西了。
還有，你們那裡的target太詭異了吧！]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/6575977.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/6575977.html#comment-16998363</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:16:46 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：下雨雪 (sleet) 的一天</title>
	<description><![CDATA[最近剛好學生上課在學這個，我覺得蠻好玩的。大氣上方的雲層降雪之後，雪往下落，卻進入一層大於攝氏零度的暖溫層，把雪融成水，這個水繼續往下掉，在接近我們地表時，又進入另一層低於零度 (冰點) 的冷溫層。如果接近地表的這層低於零度 的冷溫層夠厚，就會把水凍結為冰，成為  sleet，但如果只是薄薄的一層，那就沒有足夠的時間讓降下來的水完全凍結為冰，水打落到地面時才會霎時因接觸到低於冰點的物體表面而結成冰，這叫做 freezing rain。

二者成因皆為: 冰冷的地表上方有一厚層大於零度的暖溫層，差別只在於接近地表的那層低於零度的冷溫層夠不夠厚，能把水凍為冰。]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/2728661.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/2728661.html#comment-11745011</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:59:30 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：下雨雪 (sleet) 的一天</title>
	<description><![CDATA[今天中午我們這裡也下了ㄧ場短暫的sleet。我覺得啊，sleet的好處是，可以清洗街道！因為下午我出門的時候發現，街道簡直乾淨的不像話！！]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/2728661.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/2728661.html#comment-11745009</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:56:04 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：美國人的 Katrina? - by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[我覺得"進步"這個概念及其後的問題的確是很值得討論的，我最近也和朋友聊到，"進步"的時間特性似乎綁架了它原本的品質 - 它是需要被評價、被判斷的，而未必是新的 (近的，年輕的) 就必然比舊的 (遠古的、老的) 要正確、優秀或好。我朋友喜歡舉 organic food 當例子，過去我們阿公阿嬤不施農藥、以堆肥種田、以人力除雜草等等落後的耕作方式，反而現在成了標榜健康、環保的 "有機" 新寵，這是進步還是退步呢?! 哈哈。　]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/512927.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/512927.html#comment-11744885</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:43:53 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：湯姆洗碗 - by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[其實從之前肉圓邑跟痞子揚曾被人類所教授（某位台灣政壇官的老師）趾高氣昂暗示他們人類學背景不足，所以不夠格後，我就對這個所沒啥好印象，覺得它跟其他學校的人類所比起來，真是走傳統路線。
而，洗碗這件事...妳放心，我們家至少還有肉圓邑在監督品質啦！我想了一下，覺得我不喜歡洗碗這件事，是我在家當大姊假乖都被叫去洗碗而產生的童年陰影，所以三不五時就會亂洗一下...以後養小孩要訓練他們做家事時，還是要均衡才好...]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/642624.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/642624.html#comment-11744913</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:37:47 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：湯姆洗碗 - by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[可是我是小妹  碗還是洗不乾淨

米國人啊....他們親口跟我說....清潔劑很安全啊....那可以被人體分解的！]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/642624.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/642624.html#comment-11744915</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:05:52 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：湯姆洗碗 - by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[其實這我也聽過，但是你們真的相信嗎? 就算是這樣，也不需要洗碗洗得那麼隨興、吃洗潔精吃得那麼多吧? 其實美國人挺有安全感的，對於他們的洗碗精、農藥、擦桌子擦地板的清潔劑，都很信任。這樣活得輕鬆快樂，也許也沒啥不好吧? :p!]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/642624.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/642624.html#comment-11744917</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:25:34 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：夜半鈴聲之IBM──by小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[恭喜小河馬電腦恢復正常了！
希望這孩子以後能穩穩健健的走下去...]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/689908.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/689908.html#comment-11744945</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:30:46 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：夜半鈴聲之IBM──by小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[I sort of deduce from your comments that the main culprit of your wee-hour misfortune is UPS/SonicAir, whereas IBM could at most be faulted for the lack of its coordination with delivery carriers. This reminds me of a different but equally exacerbating incident I encountered with UPS.

About a month ago I sent a package to my cousin in Boston. Thinking that I've become fed up with USPS ("Thank you for taking a full month to snail-mail deliver my tuition fee from Yale Station to 246 Church St!") and having an itch to try UPS (cue "What Can Brown Do For You?" commercials), I eagerly brought my package to the UPS Store on the Broadway-Dixwell triangle. Since Boston isn't that far away from New Haven, it just doesn't make sense to waste an extra ten bucks to have it delivered express (or similar options that go by cutesy names). Therefore I asked the associate to have it delivered via UPS Ground, which typically takes one business day (so far as New England is concerned). And as a precaution, I signed up for e-mail correspondence so that I could both track the package and receive instant notice of change in delivery status. In all I spent about 10 bucks (including a mini-cardboard which I bought at the Store) on the whole thing, which is quite decent in my humble opinion, and service was going without a hitch, or I thought, that I ringed up my cousin and told her to expect the package the next day.

Here's how things unraveled in reality:

Day 2 (Day after delivery) - I got an e-mail late afternoon saying that UPS attempted delivery to my cousin in early afternoon and didn't go through. The package would be sent to a warehouse ~10 miles away for overnight storage, and an attempt would be made the next day, time not specified. I called my cousin, and she confirmed that she wasn't in when the delivery guy dropped by.

Day 3 - Not knowing the precise time at which delivery would arrive, she waited for the entire afternoon until going out around dusk. I got an e-mail later in the evening that UPS made a second attempt and failed again. Based on the tracking time provided by UPS, and what my cousin told me later that evening, it seems that they missed each other again (groan). As before, the package was sent back to the same warehouse, waiting to be delivered in a third and final attempt the following day, time unspecified. We both held our breath.

Day 4 - Early afternoon, I got the e-mail telling me that the third delivery attempt was missed, and therefore UPS wouldn't try to deliver it anymore. The recipient must contact the warehouse and arrange for pick-up there. Weirdly enough, my cousin swore that she was in when the delivery guy purportedly came. This sounded very troubling to me. In any case, I told her that she need to pick it up from the warehouse. The problem is that all she got from her mailbox was a slip notifying her of nothing but the pick-up, i.e., there was no mention of where, when, etc. When she told me about this discovery I was totally pissed. So I had to do a quick Google search on the whereabouts of the warehouse given the ZIP code (and at the same time cursing myself, "What does this have to do with me?")--nothing came up. Then I resorted to the search engine on the UPS web site, and to my great dismay it returned no hits. How could it be that a warehouse managed by UPS isn't even indicated in the directory of service centers on the UPS site? It just seems completely counter-intuitive and mind-boggling. At this point I was about to give up when I suddenly realized that I should call the UPS toll-free number. So I did, and instead of being able to search for the contact info of the warehouse over the phone, I was bombarded with a string of utterly asinine automated machine voice instructions which only added to my crankiness. Into the twentieth minute I determined that I couldn't take it anymore and need to speak to a human being, and holy crap, there IS that option. I finally got hooked up with a service representative and then barraged him with my mouthful of complaints, all the while he's looking up the location of warehouse and giving me directions...

That was how the whole saga came to a resolution. My cousin made a trip to the warehouse a few days later and retrieved the package. In all, this particular delivery cost me ten bucks, four hours of going back and forth with UPS and my cousin, six days from delivery to receipt, and godzillian number of somatic cells which died as my temper flared. And oh yeah, it cost about 99% of my confidence in UPS.]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/689908.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/689908.html#comment-11744947</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:21:06 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：大頭萱生日快樂!!! -- by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[因為 "我是一片雲" 和 "他是天使" 而在咱們朋友圈中又引起一陣哆嗦的大頭萱，居然說，"耶，能夠因此而還在大家的話題之中，感覺也蠻好的..."  這完全又血淋淋地映證了我所說的 -- 那令人髮指的樂觀，和把最不可能是讚美的東西全都當作是讚美的那沒來由的沾沾自喜..... Orz]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/1104427.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/1104427.html#comment-11744977</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:16:33 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：輕鬆聊書─Qing Colonial Enterprise 肉圓邑</title>
	<description><![CDATA[上回去故宮，也見到了一些應該是清朝時期的邊蕃土著畫像，有些像是寫實，有些則似乎夾雜了畫者自己對遙遠民族的想像...]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/1422928.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/1422928.html#comment-11744979</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 02:45:37 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>回應：美國人的 Katrina? - by 小河馬</title>
	<description><![CDATA[給你拍拍手，小河馬這開張第一篇，沒有被「上傳過程」打敗！

我覺得在美國，不管哪個社會科學領域，種族或族群議題受重視與廣受討論的程度，都遠超過我（一個從台灣來的學生）的想像與瞭解。事實上我跟肉圓邑幾天前還在講，我們對於課堂上有關談論美國種族的研究，總覺得雖大概瞭解美國黑人的歷史，對那些文字理看到的世界，卻沒辦法有太多對話的空間。我甚至覺得，那不只是因為我們對美國整個歷史與社會發展中的種族地位沒有深刻體會與認識（即使我們現在開始生活在所謂的「美國」，我想我們目前離那個有過去有不同性格的美國，還有段距離），而且也是因為我們在台灣時，原來就是majority的族群。我總覺得，關於social justice這件事，在台灣很少能夠談得很乾淨又很務實，可能是因為很多政治噪音的緣故吧！如果說美國是把種族問題是為集體記憶的一部份以正當化其存在，我想在台灣對弱勢族群的「關心」似乎常常在誇張的政治動作後失焦。我覺得更可怕的是，雖然人有良知，社會有共識制裁的力量，但創造共識或有影響力的聲音存在著「自以為是」的可能。所以有的時候，我甚至會覺得要解決這些族群問題種族問題是不太可能的──如果決策者想幫忙但永遠聽不到在地的聲音時；如果地方發出的聲音被貼上各式各樣的標籤或者地方本身變成被操弄的籌碼（又，誰來認定好與壞，有沒有被污染蠱惑，什麼是好什麼是沒效率？）。所以聯合國只是試圖維持一個想像世界秩序的平衡，但不代表聯合國的存在就比較可以解決這世界的問題...（哇，我好cynical！不談了啦...）
還有，我覺得很有趣的是你講到的進步。我上學期有堂課給我的新思考，就是進步/文明這件事的「時間感」──我們好像習慣認定進步/文明是總是向前或向未來發展前進的，但是其實往前進不見得代表越發展越文明（很玄妙的概念吧，這是occultism研究的領域啦！）...這樣的思考與想法，當看到同一個社會裡醜陋與光鮮亮麗（或者說，物質貧乏跟富裕的狀況）並存的那一面時，好像比較可以解讀。肉圓邑最近才剛唸過一篇論文，講的是美國貧民窟的問題，好像深入探討許多貧民窟存在背後隱含的社會與國家秩序等等。如果你唸過Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)(變身怪醫)這本小說，其實裡頭關於社會並存的正義與邪惡，光明與黑暗都包含在同一主角與他所處的城市裡，我想這種對比與共同體，在每個社會可能都是沒有辦法但一直試圖逃避或解決的問題。
東扯西扯扯一堆，也許也不是真的在回應你，總之，謝謝你開始「插手」進來亂談啦！]]>
	</description>
	<link>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/512927.html</link>
	<guid>http://blog.roodo.com/8hands/archives/512927.html#comment-11744883</guid>
		<category>最新文章回應</category>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:26:43 +0800</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
